1 / 8

Shaping CCPS’ response to the cuts CCPS membership meeting September 2010

Shaping CCPS’ response to the cuts CCPS membership meeting September 2010. Evidence. Service provider optimism survey VSSSWU workforce pay and conditions survey Evidencing quality. Service provider optimism survey. Longitudinal data (from October 09)

karina-morrison
Download Presentation

Shaping CCPS’ response to the cuts CCPS membership meeting September 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shaping CCPS’ response to the cuts CCPS membership meeting September 2010

  2. Evidence • Service provider optimism survey • VSSSWU workforce pay and conditions survey • Evidencing quality

  3. Service provider optimism survey • Longitudinal data (from October 09) • Established baseline, now seeing impact of e.g. political changes • Introduction of case studies from Sept 10 • Relies on good response rate and consistency in respondents

  4. Workforce pay and conditions • VSSSWU survey • Circulating end September • Making a case for the sector OR • Making a case for more outsourcing

  5. Protecting quality? • But what is quality? • Improved outcomes • Preventative • Choice and control • Good Care Commission grades

  6. Proving your worth… 1. Is the activity essential to meet government priorities? 2. Does the government need to fund it? 3. Does it provide substantial economic value? 4. Can it be targeted at those most in need? 5. How can it be provided more cheaply? 6. How can it be provided more effectively? 7. Can the activity come from a non-state provider or by citizens, wholly or in partnership? 8. Can non-state providers be paid to carry it out according to the results they achieve? 9. Can local bodies, as opposed to central government, provide it?

  7. Stick, Twist or Fold26 and 27 November 2010 • Outputs from CCPS think tank • Facing the cliff edge with confidence • Questioning thinkers and politicians about the future, and new models of public service delivery • Evidencing impact • Models of innovative practice

  8. Your thoughts? • 0131 475 2676 • Annie.gunner_logan@ccpscotland.org • Kirsten.gooday@ccpscotland.org

More Related