Presented by Jimmy C. Haywood, P.E. Huntsville Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

1. Presented by Jimmy C. Haywood, P.E. Huntsville Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

2. Objectives M&V Definition M&V Plan Format Witnessing of M&V CEHNC Experiences Lessons Learned Training

3. M&V Definition

4. M&V Definition

5. M&V Definition

6. M&V Definition CEHNC does not dictate specific M&V protocol Can use

7. M&V Definition Customers tend to prefer IPMVP

8. M&V Plan FormatEnergy General Description for each ECSM Rationale for selection of method Baseline consumption Actual savings determination method Calculations Identify risk factors & who assumes the risk Instrumentation & Calibration Frequency of measurements Identify any stipulated parameters Indicate anticipated results Blank forms that to be used in future reports

9. M&V Plan Format Maintenance Provide for each Maintenance Procedure: Description Frequency Cost Date performed (to be included in report) Who performed (to be included in report)

10. Witness of M&V Government should witness baseline measurements Government should witness retrofit measurements Identify Government POC Name Phone number position

11. M&V PlansWhat Have We Seen ? Adequate M&V plans Inadequate or confusing M&V plans Each ECSM not identified No contingency plans for variances Inadequate sampling Wrong assumptions Wrong hours of operation Modeling with no calibration General lack of details

12. M&V ResultsWhat Have We Seen ? Expected results achieved. Inadequate M&V requiring multiple submissions Low flow toilets that use more water than the original equipment Poor performance on low flow toilets Shower heads that have too low of a flow (0.5 gpm) HVAC controls that are not functioning Interface with other equipment not addressed (commissioning) Baseline measurements not performed in accordance with the approved task order and identified after new equipment is installed.

13. M&V ResultsWhat Have We Seen ? Inadequate M&V requiring multiple submissions Broken data loggers discovered after several months Boiler efficiency based on operating logs (yielded 110% efficiency ?) Faucet aerators too low flow (0.5 gpm) Inadequate water pressure Installed meters not read Required utility bill data not provided Missing required balancing reports Testing unloaded chillers Inconsistency in witnessing of M&V

15. Lessons Learned Provide format for M&V Plan Provide M&V check list

16. Lessons Learned

17. Lessons Learned

18. Lessons Learned

19. Lessons Learned

20. Lessons Learned Problem: No clear understanding of M&V Plan by key participants during construction Solution: Mandate Pre-construction meeting with CEHNC, Contractor, Customer, & C.O.R

21. Lessons Learned Long Term Review actual implementation of M&V Perform after 1 or 2 years of project acceptance Answer the following questions: Is customer happy with the product ? Is the project working as intended ? Should we change our future M&V procedures ?

22. M&V Training Developed & provided for AMC Additional training is available upon request