1 / 38

Survey on Institutional Arrangements for NMHSs and Identification of Future Priorities in RA V

Survey on Institutional Arrangements for NMHSs and Identification of Future Priorities in RA V. Objective: - To collect basic information about the current institutional arrangements of hydrometeorological services;

kata
Download Presentation

Survey on Institutional Arrangements for NMHSs and Identification of Future Priorities in RA V

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Survey on Institutional Arrangements for NMHSs and Identification of Future Priorities in RA V

  2. Objective: - To collect basic information about the current institutional arrangements of hydrometeorological services; - To identify the views of the RA V Members regarding the most important challenges and priorities; - To help the Management Group and Secretariat to prepare a detailed background material for the discussions during the RA V-16

  3. Survey Questionnaire • Survey Analysis • Executive Summary

  4. Survey Questionnaire • Institutional Arrangements • Management and Organisation • Operation and Services • Challenges and Priorities

  5. Survey Questionnaire: Institutional Arrangements 1.1 Exact Title of the National Meteorological or Hydrometeorological Service (NM(H)S) 1.2 Title of the parent organization 1.3 What is the legal status of the NMHS (e.g., Agency, Department, State owned enterprise, etc) 1.4 Is the NM(H)S responsible for operational hydrology 1.5 If your answer on the preceding question is "No", please provide the name of the National Hydrological Service

  6. 1.6 Is the NM(H)S responsible for the provision of meteorological service for aviation (Select the appropriate answer from the list below) 1.7 In your country, is there a law, decree or other legislative act on meteorology (or hydrometeorology, or similar) 1.8 Provide the title of the primary legislative act that determines the functions of your Service 1.9 Please indicate any other regulatory framework applicable to the functions of your Service

  7. Survey Questionnaire: Management and Organisation 2.1 NM(H)S Staff: what is the total staff of your organization (full time equivalent) 2.2 NM(H)S Staff: number of staff with higher education degree (i.e., university or higher) 2.3 NM(H)S Staff: if available what is the average age of the staff 2.4 NM(H)S Staff trends: please indicate the trend of the staffing figures during the recent 35 years 2.5 NM(H)S Budget: what is the total budget of your organization (e.g., year 2013-14); please indicate the currency first 2.6 NM(H)S Budget: main sources of funding 2.7 NM(H)S Budget: what percentage of the budget comes from nongovernment budget

  8. 2.8 NM(H)S Budget: trends: please indicate the trend of the government component of the budget during the recent 35 years 2.9 NM(H)S Budget: alternative sources please indicate sources of funding for improving the hydrometeorological infrastructure, etc. 2.10 NM(H)S Areas of Responsibility • Hydrology • Climate • Air/Water quality • Meteorology • Oceanograghy

  9. Survey Monkey https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/RAV_Survey_2014

  10. Institutional Arrangements Survey Analysis 10

  11. One third of Members are functioning without formal legislation 11

  12. Management and Organisation Survey Analysis 12

  13. NMHS staff numbers 13

  14. Staff qualifications and age 14

  15. Staff trends in last 3-5 years 15

  16. NMHS budget 16

  17. NMHS services 17

  18. Business model of NMHSs in RA V is predominantly government or state owned. 18

  19. Almost all Members have development/strategic plan covering next 3-5 years. 19

  20. 20

  21. QMS Implemented (9) QMS in Aviation only (6) No Implementation of QMS (3) 21

  22. Operation and Services Survey Analysis 22

  23. 23

  24. 24

  25. 25

  26. Challenges and Priorities Survey Analysis 26

  27. 27

  28. 28

  29. Support to subsidiary bodies 29

  30. Reasons for not supporting subsidiary bodies 30

  31. Useful activities of subsidiary bodies 31

  32. Expected Supports from Other Members Joint/twinning projects Capacity Building Technical support on QMS Observations Upgrading facilities and capabilities Expected Supports from the Secretariat Financial and coordination support for regional events Secretariat should review its methods and working mechanisms at regional level to increase its efficiency and effectiveness Support to develop strategic plans Advice on available support options Facilitation of procurement and calibration of instruments Continued information sharing on regional activities, including capacity development programmes of external partners (EU, etc). 32

  33. Expected Outcomes from RA V-16 The expected outcomes from RA V-16 Strengthening of regional cooperation Preparation of an agreed strategic plan to guide the work of RA V for the next four years, including a clear articulation of a small number of high priority work areas Plans for improving observing systems and minimizing missing data Also mentioned More regional cooperation in the area of hydrology, expert exchange, instruments upgrade for early warning system (EWS) Regional training needs assessment plan Improvement of the Pacific observation network Identification of gaps and proposed treatments Agreement to establish on-line forums to discuss issues. 33

  34. Executive Summary

  35. Executive Summary • A Survey was conducted to identify challenges and future priorities in RA V by using the SurveyMonkey platform. • Analysis has been made for the Region in five categories: • (a) institutional arrangements; • (b) management and organization; • (c) operations and services; • (d) challenges and priorities; and • (e) expected outcomes from RA V-16

  36. Executive Summary • Institutional Arrangements The most common title of NMHS in RA V is “Service” or “Agency” Thirteen Members are functioning under different primary legislative acts or orders of decree - six Members are still functioning without legal authorities • Management and Organization The business model of NMHSs in RA V is predominantly government or state owned that strictly confined to the government policy, guidance and budgetary support with little freedom to do commercial activities. Almost all Members except for one Member have national development/strategic plans covering the next 3-5 years. The capacity building of staff and enhancement of operational forecasts including warning products with improved IT services are priorities of development/strategic plans.

  37. Executive Summary (RA V) • Operations and Services The Members are facing difficulties with: inadequacy of equipment and IT infrastructure; automation of surface observing networks; agro-meteorological observations; and upper-air observations. • Challenges and Priorities The challenges in the Region identified by the survey include: lack of qualified personnel; NWP modeling capacity; observing systems; and EWS services for DRR, among others. The Members particularly identified: adequacy of NWP modeling capacity; lack of qualified personnel; and adequacy of EWS and services for DRR, as serious challenges.

  38. Thank you

More Related