390 likes | 522 Views
Outline. . 1. Motivation 2. Fasterix and EM simulation3. System parameters4. Super Node Algorithm5. Numerical example6. Passivity enforcement7. Conclusions. 1. . From the original model to the reduced oneRealization. Outline. . 1. Motivation 2. Fasterix and EM simulation3. System
E N D
1. Stability and Passivity of the Super Node Algorithmfor EM modelling of ICs
4. Smaller feature sizes but increasing complexity
Smaller feature sizes but increasing complexity
9. Inefficient: because of it contains many nodes, many RLC elements (order of ten thousand)Inefficient: because of it contains many nodes, many RLC elements (order of ten thousand)
15. RLC matrices positive definite. P incidence matrix
PROOF is AVAILABLE!!!!!RLC matrices positive definite. P incidence matrix
PROOF is AVAILABLE!!!!!
16. Important:
1. ports are preserved.
2. Every terminal (port) is a super nodeImportant:
1. ports are preserved.
2. Every terminal (port) is a super node
19. Y1 describes the reduced model
linear relation: Jn=YnVn
Y1 describes the reduced model
linear relation: Jn=YnVn
22. Solution of (3) depends on the frequency range of interest
Solution of (3) depends on the frequency range of interest
30. Each branch characterizes by m stable poles, but it does not mean that the whole
Circuit will have the same poles
to guarantee stability: realization must be done correctly
------------? more finite poles
redundancy (each branch characterizes by m stable poles)Each branch characterizes by m stable poles, but it does not mean that the whole
Circuit will have the same poles
to guarantee stability: realization must be done correctly
------------? more finite poles
redundancy (each branch characterizes by m stable poles)
31. Now the question is: how to guarantee that reduced circuit will be described by EXACTLY the SAME poles?????????
Does the way of choosing sk influence at stability? (Open question)
New poles appear in RHP
Redundancy
Now the question is: how to guarantee that reduced circuit will be described by EXACTLY the SAME poles?????????
Does the way of choosing sk influence at stability? (Open question)
New poles appear in RHP
Redundancy
32. Capacitance does not influence at the poles of the circut
stable if pi>0 and both ports: grounded / voltage / current sources
SNA realization: not all super nodes play a role of the ports!
poles are defined by pi=Ri/Li
Capacitance does not influence at the poles of the circut
stable if pi>0 and both ports: grounded / voltage / current sources
SNA realization: not all super nodes play a role of the ports!
poles are defined by pi=Ri/Li
36. Why modal approximation and not another passivity preserving tehnique???
The answer: we do not need to calculate ALL generalized eigenvalues. But in fact we can use any passivity preserving reduction techniques.Why modal approximation and not another passivity preserving tehnique???
The answer: we do not need to calculate ALL generalized eigenvalues. But in fact we can use any passivity preserving reduction techniques.
38. Optimal choice of match frequencies sk? (point of interest only for stable models)Optimal choice of match frequencies sk? (point of interest only for stable models)