1 / 23

Participatory Rural Appraisal

Participatory Rural Appraisal. Overview of presentation. Introduction and Definition of PRA Origin of PRA Principles shared by PRA and RRA Exclusive principles of PRA What it is? Definition Principle Components Precepts of PRA Evolution in Details What’s in it? Where it is Applied?

kato-dyer
Download Presentation

Participatory Rural Appraisal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Participatory Rural Appraisal

  2. Overview of presentation • Introduction and Definition of PRA • Origin of PRA • Principles shared by PRA and RRA • Exclusive principles of PRA • What it is? • Definition • Principle Components • Precepts of PRA • Evolution in Details • What’s in it? • Where it is Applied? • Practical Example • Criticism • Bibliography

  3. PRA: Introduction and Definition • PRA : Participatory Rural Appraisal • Components: • People • Knowledge • Participation • Planning • Action • It is a combination of different approaches to • Share • Enhance • Analyze • Plan • Act For the betterment of the rural people with their participation • The secrets behind the success of PRA are • Decentralization • Empowerment

  4. PRA: Origin • PRA has been evolved from RRA (Rapid Rural Appraisal) • In mid 80’s the necessity of participation in rural development became evident and the term PRA was born • The understanding of PRA came mostly from field rather than academia • PRA mostly focuses on the empowerment of people through participation • The sustainability rate of PRA is high due to the participation of the local people • The sense of ownership and belongingness helps to the success of PRA

  5. Principles shared by PRA & RRA • Reversal of learning • To learn of the local people • Learning rapidly and progressively • Exploration, flexible methods, adaptable • Offsetting bias • To be receptive rather than preconceived ideas • Optimizing tradeoffs • Understanding the usefulness of information • Triangulating • Crosschecking and approximation

  6. Exclusive Principles of PRA • Empowerment • The authority to local people through decentralization and confidence building • Self critical awareness • Mistakes are lessons to learn and to do better next time • Personal responsibility • The belongingness and ownership to the participants • Sharing • To discuss and argue about ideas in open forum with all stakeholders

  7. What it is? • Participatory research is not an alternative research method, but an approach that can be applied to any methodology – survey, experimental, qualitative (Lilja and Bellon 2008). • “PRA methods, as they are often called, are visual and tangible and usually performed by small groups of people”. (Chambers 2007) • PRA comprised of different research tools to facilitate local people in • Analyzing information • Practicing critical self-awareness • Taking responsibility • Sharing their knowledge of life and conditions to plan and to act.

  8. Definition • As it has diverse application and has been changing rapidly any effort to define it might be folly and ‘unhelpful’. • “ An approach and methods for learning about rural life and conditions from, with and by rural people”. (Chambers 1994)

  9. Principle Components of PRA Source: Chambers 2007.

  10. Adopted from Chambers 2007

  11. Evolution • Originally evolved from Rapid Rural Appraisal and spread fast in the 1990s. • Shift in rhetoric: “from top-down to bottom up, from centralized to local diversity, from blue prints to learning process”. (Chambers 1994) • Learning is two way system and respondents know better his/her daily encounter. • Emphasis on the power relation between the researcher and ‘researched’. • Practicing participatory research started since 1983 in Bangladesh.

  12. Evolution • Five streams which stand out as sources and parallels to PRA are, in alphabetical order: • Activist participatory research; • Agro-ecosystem analysis; • Applied anthropology; • Field research on farming systems; • Rapid rural appraisal. (Chambers 1994)

  13. Activist Participatory Research • The contributions of APR to PRA are more through concepts than methods: • Common ideas: • Poor people are creative and capable; • Can and should do their own investigation, analysis and planning; • Outsiders have roles as a convenors, catalysts and facilitators. • The weak and marginalized can and should be improved.

  14. Agro-ecosystem Analysis • Gordon Conway developed this approach in Thailand at the University of Chiang Mai around the year 1978. • It contributed much in current RRA and PRA through: • Transects (Systematic walks and observation); • Informal mapping (Sketch maps drawn on site); • Diagramming (Seasonal Calendars, flow and causal diagrams, bar charts, van or chapatidiagrams ) • Innovation assessment (scoring and ranking different actions)

  15. Applied Anthropology • “PRA represents an extension and application of social anthropological approaches, insights, and methods, cross-fertilized with others.” • Insights and contributions from Applied Anthropology: • Field learning is flexible art rather than rigid science; • The value of field residence, unhurried participant observation, and conversations; • The importance of attitude, behavior and rapport; • The emic-etic distinction; • The validity and importance of ITK.

  16. Field Research on Farming System • Have contributed to the appreciation and understanding of • Complexity, diversity and risk-proneness of many farming system; • The knowledge, professionalism and rationality of small and poor farmers; • Their experimental mindset and behavior; • Their ability to conduct their own analysis.

  17. Rapid Rural Appraisal • Has three main origins: • Disappointment: anti-poverty bias, rural development tourism. • Disillusion with questionnaire surveys and their confusing results; • Cost-effective.

  18. From RRA to PRA

  19. What’s in it? • Secondary sources • Semi-structured interviews • Key informants • Groups of various kinds • Do-it-yourself • They do it • Participatory analysis of secondary sources- aerial photographs • Participatory mapping and modeling • Transect walks • Time line and trend and change analysis • Oral histories and ethno-biographies • Seasonal Calendars • Daily time use analysis • Livelihood analysis • Participatory linkage diagramming • Institutional or Venn Diagramming • Well being and wealth grouping and ranking • Analysis of difference • Matrix scoring and ranking • Estimates and quantification • Stories, portraits and case studies • Team contracts and Interactions • Presentation and analysis • Participatory planning, budgeting, monitoring • Group discussions

  20. Where it is applied? • PRA applications include: • Natural Resource Management; • Agriculture; • Poverty and Social Programs; • Health and • Food Security Analysis. • Project Cycle • From inception to end. • Participatory projects pull methods, attitudes and values from PRA. • ‘Micro projects’

  21. Practical Example • VGDUP- Vulnerable Group Development for Ultra-poor • What are the indicators? • Owning less than 10 decimals of land(0.04 ha) • No ownership of production assets • There are no active adult male house hold members • Employment, if any is limited to day-laboring or domestic help • The household is de facto headed by a women (divorced, abandoned, widow, unmarried) • PRA in this project • Wealth ranking among the candidates

  22. Whose Participation?: The criticism • “... much of what currently passes as 'participatory' involves local people taking part in other people's projects, according to agendas set by external interests.” (Cornwall 1996) • Remained donor driven and ‘imposed’. • Lack of proper training distorts the overall objectives of this approach. • Methods are often used to extract info’s rather than to empower. • Even the term ‘carpet-bombed with PRA’ came forward due to its over utilization. • Shortcomings of some methods like community meetings and widespread use of group discussion.

  23. Bibliography • Lilja , Nina and Mauricio Bellon ; Some common questions about participatory research: a review of the literature, Development in Practice, Volume 18, Numbers 4–5, August 2008. • Chambers, Robert; The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal. World Development, Volume 22, No 7, pp 953-969, 1994. • Chambers, Robert; From PRA to PLA and Pluralism: Practice and Theory, Working Paper 286, IDS, 2007. • Cornwall, Andrea; Towards participatory practice: participatory rural appraisal (PRA) and the participatory process inDe Koning, Korrie and Martin Marion (1996). Participatory Research in Health: Issues and Experiences. Zen Books Ltd., London.

More Related