1 / 7

TGai Draft Review Overview

TGai Draft Review Overview. Authors:. Date: 2012-12-10. Abstract. Overview of suggested Review Process of TGai Draft and CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS to review TGai D0.2. Suggested Review Process. Dec 2012 – Jan 2013: Volunteers review TGai D0.2

kayla
Download Presentation

TGai Draft Review Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGai Draft Review Overview Authors: Date: 2012-12-10 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUS

  2. Abstract Overview of suggested Review Process of TGai Draft and CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS to review TGai D0.2 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUS

  3. Suggested Review Process • Dec 2012 – Jan 2013: Volunteers review TGai D0.2 • Vancouver meeting Jan 2013: have a cleaned up version of the draft • Jan 2013 after Vancouver meeting: Open call for comments (mainly TGai membership but also open to entire 802.11) • March 2013: work on resolving received comments • May 2013: WG Letter Ballot Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUS

  4. Volunteer Draft Review • Call for volunteers to review TGai D0.2 • TGai members: • <who wants to volunteer ?> • Additional people • Adrian Stephens & Peter E. (WG editors) ? • <who else ? do we anticipate any conflicts with other drafts tackling similar sections, e.g. ah? We could ask the corresponding technical editor.> • Objective: • Improve on language / grammar to make D0.2 align with existing 802.11 drafts • Identify technical issues that have to be addressed • Outcome: • List of open items and suggested changes (Use LB template to provide feedback) • If possible, submission ready for approval solving open issues • Due Date: • Jan 2013 (to discuss suggested changes and open issues in Vancouver Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUS

  5. Open Call for comments • Similar to letter ballot, but • mainly TGai members only • Open to entire WG (no requirement to provide feedback to maintain voting rights) • Less formal than WG LB • Goal: • Identify open issues before entering the obligations coming along the actual WG LB • Timing: • Our goal should be to start this process right after the Vancouver meeting Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUS

  6. WG Letter Ballot • Start after March meeting. • Use the March meeting and the telcos before (!) to resolve comments received during the open call for comments. • The fun starts here  Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUS

  7. Call for Volunteers • Discussion item • Should we directly approach “volunteers” only or have an open call for volunteers issued via the reflector • We only want a handful of people who provide detailed feedback including suggestions to resolve open issues Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUS

More Related