1 / 35

Validating Objective Measures of Physical Activity with a Novel Device

Validating Objective Measures of Physical Activity with a Novel Device. Phil Hurvitz UrbDP 598: Built Environment & Health January 22, 2008. Overview. Background Currently used devices: benefits and drawbacks A new device: the Multi-Sensor Board (MSB) Preliminary data.

kaylee
Download Presentation

Validating Objective Measures of Physical Activity with a Novel Device

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Validating Objective Measures ofPhysical Activity with a Novel Device Phil Hurvitz UrbDP 598: Built Environment & Health January 22, 2008

  2. Overview • Background • Currently used devices: benefits and drawbacks • A new device: the Multi-Sensor Board (MSB) • Preliminary data Slide 2 (of 35)

  3. High prevalence of no physical activity BRFSS: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/ Slide 3 (of 35)

  4. Increasing prevalence of obesity BRFSS: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/ Slide 4 (of 35)

  5. How did this happen? • Natural history of the human animal: we need physical activity (PA) to maintain a healthy body & mind • Modern conveniences have engineered PA out of our daily lives • Better to be fit & fat than thin & sedentary Slide 5 (of 35)

  6. Modern conveniences “... the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. ” --Thomas Hobbes Slide 6 (of 35)

  7. Modern conveniences Slide 7 (of 35)

  8. A worldwide crisis? Slide 8 (of 35)

  9. A worldwide crisis? Slide 9 (of 35)

  10. Females age 15-100, 2005 WHO: http://www.who.int/en/ Slide 10 (of 35)

  11. Males age 15-100, 2005 WHO: http://www.who.int/en/ Slide 11 (of 35)

  12. Better to be fit & fat than thin & sedentary Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Laditka JN, Hardin JW, Chase N, Hooker SP, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity as mortality predictors in older adults. JAMA. 2007 Dec 5;298(21):2507-16. Slide 12 (of 35)

  13. Goal: increase physical activity • No apparent decrease in development and use of labor-saving devices • Will health agency guidelines “work” in the face of technological advances? • How will we know if there are changes in physical activity rates? • Current methods of measuring physical activity are not adequate! Slide 13 (of 35)

  14. Current methods Slide 14 (of 35)

  15. State-of-the-art: IDEEA • Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Activity (IDEAA) • sensors attached to skin (cumbersome) • relative accelerometry of different body parts • no locational capability • no external environmental cues • $4,000 per unit Slide 15 (of 35)

  16. State-of-the-art: MSB • Multi-Sensor Board • UW/Intel invention, recent development • single sensing unit with data logger (smart phone) • easily worn • measures multiple environmental data streams • obtains XY location data • estimated $100 per unit costin large manufacturing run Slide 16 (of 35)

  17. Environmental data • Raw sensor data • Measurement frequency >200 Hzfor some variables Slide 17 (of 35)

  18. Locational data • Real-time differentially corrected GPS • Ground accuracy: 3-7 m under typically good conditions • GPS data combined with MSB data • 1 s temporal resolution Slide 18 (of 35)

  19. Data classification • Hidden Markov Model with Decision Stumps(a probabilistic data classification model based on multiple variables) Lester, J., Choudhury, T., Kern, N., Borriello, G., & Hannaford, B. (2005). A hybrid discriminative/generative approach for modeling human activities. Paper presented at the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Slide 19 (of 35)

  20. Data classification: pilot study precision = (true positive/(true positive + false positive)) recall = (true positive/(true positive + false negative)) Lester, J., Choudhury, T., Kern, N., Borriello, G., & Hannaford, B. (2005). A hybrid discriminative/generative approach for modeling human activities. Paper presented at the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Slide 20 (of 35)

  21. Data collection process • Environment measures • Subjects wear MSB on belt • MSB measures (8 variables) • GPS location • Continuous data sampling, 1Hz • Activity self-report • Subjects carry Windows Mobile phone • Hourly data sampling Slide 21 (of 35)

  22. Activity self-report • Questionnaire administered on Smart Phone Slide 22 (of 35)

  23. Activity self-report • Text message sent after questionnaire completed Slide 23 (of 35)

  24. Activity self-report Slide 24 (of 35)

  25. Preliminary data: location • 1 subject, 7 d, ~146,000 points Slide 25 (of 35)

  26. Preliminary data: classification Slide 26 (of 35)

  27. Research Question(s) • What build environment (BE) characteristics are associated with different activities? • Walking • Running • Pedal-cycling • Sitting • Driving Slide 27 (of 35)

  28. Research Question(s) • What BE characteristics are associated with: • Walking trips < 1 mi • Driving trips < 1 mi • What is the size of an individual’s spatial extent of activity • All activity • Active modes of transport vs. Inactive modes • How does spatial extent vary across age, gender, wealth, BMI, BE of home &/or work location? Slide 28 (of 35)

  29. Measuring built environment • What to measure? • Based on research question(s) • GIS data sources • Point locations • Buffer measures • Proximity measures • Where to measure? • Home-centered • Frank et al. 2005 • Moudon et al. 2005 • Where does activity take place in real time? Slide 29 (of 35)

  30. Measuring built environment • Point-centered analysis of location • Any number of different data sets can be quantified • Enumeration & relative proportion of different land uses • Parcel density • Street-block size • Total length of sidewalk • Number of intersections, lighted crosswalks • Area and count of parks • Distance to different built environment features • We should quantify & analyze all locations that are experienced during the day, not only the home location • Work & school environments may be key determinants of physical activity Slide 30 (of 35)

  31. Measuring built environment: land use Slide 31 (of 35)

  32. Data reduction sampling strategy • Sampling strategy for data reduction without loss of variability 10% sample → 1.5 million data points (time or distance?) Slide 32 (of 35)

  33. Challenges • Administrative challenges • Bugs • “Cutting edge” may sound super-cool, but it leads to “bleeding” • Validating a new method requires a big commitment • Interdisciplinarity has its ups & downs • The future of all complex research • Relying on others’ time & expertise • Working around another project’s timeline Slide 33 (of 35)

  34. Challenges • Operational challenges • Lots of data to deal with 50 subjects * 7 d * 8 h/d * 60 m/h * 60 s/m = 10,080,000 observations 50 subjects * 8 h/d * 7 d * 1 survey/h = 2800 surveys Slide 34 (of 35)

  35. Conclusion • Questions? • Interested in volunteering? http://tinyurl.com/3x2rkv http://gis.washington.edu/phurvitz/msb/ phurvitz@u.washington.edu Slide 35 (of 35)

More Related