1 / 30

Breastfeeding is Good for Business

Breastfeeding is Good for Business. Sneak Preview – Section 2. Learning objective: Describe three ways supporting breastfeeding can improve a company’s bottom line. Topics: the business case for breastfeeding Handout A: “Elevator Speech”

Download Presentation

Breastfeeding is Good for Business

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Breastfeeding is Good for Business

  2. Sneak Preview – Section 2 • Learning objective: Describe three ways supporting breastfeeding can improve a company’s bottom line. • Topics: the business case for breastfeeding • Handout A: “Elevator Speech” • Resource from The Business Case for Breastfeeding- Folder #1: “The Business Case for Breastfeeding”

  3. Understanding Business Priorities • Economic environment poses challenges for all businesses to STAY in business • Start-up businesses face even greater challenges • The economic environment makes it hard for employers to consider new programs unless the financial benefits are compelling. • Business priorities: • Handling more work with fewer people • Shrinking workforce of qualified people • Stress • Productivity among workers

  4. The GOOD News! • Lactation support programs provide solutions! • Changing environment requires managers to apply cutting edge methods to reduce absenteeism and maximize employee productivity, • Reduced risk of “presenteeism” due to stress, fatigue, illness • Ripple effect • Employers are implementing novel programs to attract new employees and improve employee health

  5. Family-Friendly Programs are On the Rise! (Alliance for Work-Life Programs 2007)

  6. Family-Friendly Programs WORK • Aetna New program providing 6 months of unpaid leave and part-time return to work option following family/maternity leave • Attrition dropped by 50% • Savings: $1 million per year (Cardenas 2005) • Companies offering family-friendly benefits experience: • Lower turnover rates • Greater job satisfaction and loyalty • Employees work later into pregnancy, return to work faster, and work more “on their own time” • Spillover effect – less perceived stress at home (Schwartz 1996)

  7. The Bottom Line • Family-friendly programs put money back into the human relations budget. • For every $1 spent on wellness, companies typically save $16 in improved productivity, lower absenteeism and turnover rates, and lower healthcare premiums.

  8. The Business Case for Breastfeeding • In today’s economic environment, employers are more likely to respond to programs that provide solutions that increase the bottom line

  9. Activity: The Business Case • Financial benefit • Expected cost • Potential risks • Risk of NOT investing in this • Options and rationale

  10. Show Me the Money!

  11. Return on Investment (ROI) (total benefit – total cost) = x 100 = ROI total cost • Total benefit = money saved or income realized • Total cost = monetary investment (both obvious and hidden) • A lactation program might have a lower ROI in the first year, but higher ROI the longer the life of the program • A positive ROI at least breaks even (especially in the first year) and a ROI of 2-1 or higher demonstrates the program is worth the investment

  12. Anticipated Benefits: $1,000 in health care savings per employee $1,000 per employee in lower absenteeism savings $30,000 in turnover cost savings for EACH of 6 employees Anticipated Costs: $5,000 for facility renovations $300 for breast pumps for each employee $40,000 for staff time to implement the program $10,000 contractual fee to IBCLC $2,000 in administrative costs Practice! Lactation Program for a company that will potentially be used by 30 employees

  13. Comprehensive Lactation Support Program Definition of “lactation support program” A comprehensive program of support for breastfeeding employees in a workplace that includes the following 4 components: • Support from supervisors, colleagues, and other mothers • Flexible return to work options and time to express milk at work • Education and access to professional lactation support • Private space for women to breastfeed or express milk when they are at work

  14. The Bottom Line:Breastfeeding is GOOD for Business • Lactation support does not deplete funds from human resource benefits…it puts money back INTO it • Translate health benefits into business language…the ROI See “Employer Snapshots” in Folder #3, “Tool Kit”

  15. Lactation Support: Reduces Health Care Costs • For every 1,000 babies who are NOT breastfed compared to exclusively breastfeeding babies, there are an extra: • 2,033 physician visits • 212 hospitalization days • 609 prescriptions (Ball 1999)

  16. Show Me the MoneyMutual of Omaha Case Study • Newborn health care costs were THREE TIMES LESS for mothers in the program ($1,269 vs. $3,415) • Annual savings: $115,881 (for health care costs alone) • The Bottom Line: annual savings per participant: $2,146 (Mutual of Omaha 2001)

  17. Show Me the MoneyAetna Case Study • Program saved $1,435 in medical claims per breastfed infant during first year of life • Annual savings in health care claims was $108,737 for an ROI of 3 to 1 • The Bottom Line: annual savings per participant: $1,435 (Ball 2001)

  18. Lactation Support:Reduces Absenteeism • One-day absences occur twice as often for employees whose babies are not breastfed (Cohen 95) • Absenteeism rates are lower for male employees when female partners breastfeed (Galtry 97)

  19. Show Me the MoneyCIGNA Case Study • Lactation program resulted in a 77% reduction in lost work time due to infant illness • Annual savings: $60,000 (Dickson 2000)

  20. Lactation Support:Lowers Turnover Rates • Employee retention a leading challenge for employers • National retention rate is 59% after maternity leave absence • Companies with lactation programs have higher retention rates • Mutual of Omaha – 83% (Mutual of Omaha 2001) • 9-company study – 94.2% (Ortiz 2006)

  21. Show Me the MoneyThe Cost of Replacing Employees • Separation Costs • Paying off accrued leave • Arranging for temporary replacement staff • Loss of experience and knowledge • Replacement Costs • Temporary staff • Management time • Advertising costs • Training Costs (Griffith 2001) • Travel and relocation expenses • Lost time in productivity • Losses due to human errors

  22. Show Me the MoneyReplacement Costs • Actual costs vary based on job position • Estimates: • 150% of that person’s annual salary (Reh 2006) • 70% for a receptionist job; 200% for replacing a manager (U.S. Department of Labor) • New Zealand: savings of NZ$75,000 [US$50,000]per retained employee(EEO Trust 2001) • www.dol.gov/cfbci/turnover.htm

  23. Lactation Support:Satisfies Employees • Employees of companies providing lactation support feel more productive and loyal to the company (Galtry 97; Frank 98)

  24. Show Me the MoneyL.A. Department of Water and Power Case Study • Lactation program available for both male and female employees • 83% felt more positive about the company • 67% said they intend to make it their long-term employer

  25. WIN! WIN! WIN!

  26. Lactation Support Benefitsby Company Size (SHRM 2007)

  27. Common Family-Friendly Benefits (SHRM 2007)

  28. Lactation Program Benefits by Industry (SHRM 2007)

  29. Elevator Speech • What service are you proposing? • What problem will it help solve? • What target group will it impact? • How will the service improve the bottom line? • What is the competitive advantage? • What do you want the listener to provide? • How will you help?

More Related