1 / 10

FOCUS FOR THE FUTURE: UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO PROGRAM REVIEW AND PRIORITIZATION

SEPTEMBER 16, 2013. FOCUS FOR THE FUTURE: UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO PROGRAM REVIEW AND PRIORITIZATION. Robert C. Dickeson , Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services: Reallocating Resources to Achieve Strategic Balance (2010) Regents acceptance June 20, 2013. Centrality.

keaton
Download Presentation

FOCUS FOR THE FUTURE: UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO PROGRAM REVIEW AND PRIORITIZATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 FOCUS FOR THE FUTURE:UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO PROGRAM REVIEW AND PRIORITIZATION

  2. Robert C. Dickeson, Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services: Reallocating Resources to Achieve Strategic Balance (2010) Regents acceptance June 20, 2013

  3. Centrality • Central to Mission and future • National, land-grant, comprehensive research university • University of Idaho Strategic Plan • Idaho stakeholders • Program is essential for University of Idaho success

  4. External Demand • Current and future demand for graduates • Current and future demand for research/creative activity • Current and future demand for outreach/engagement • Current and future demand for services

  5. Internal Demand • Curricular collaborations • Scholarly collaborations • Funded research collaborations • Need and attractiveness of program to internal people and programs • Role in compliance • Contribution to University community well-being • Program enhances student recruitment and/or retention

  6. Quality • Contributes to national and international reputation of the university • National and International recognition of faculty contributions • Faculty achievement • UI data in comparison to regional and/or national data

  7. Size and Productivity • Critical mass of faculty and/or staff • Academic program (per FTE) produces significant • Graduates • Student Credit hours • Scholarly/creative activity products • Outreach and Engagement • Measurements of customer service

  8. Cost Effectiveness • Program seeks to measure all relevant costs and/or income • Program expenditures are comparable to similar programs at other national research universities • Funds invested produce desired services

  9. Impact • Program’s work produces significant changes in practices and/or conditions of key stakeholder audiences • Program is responsive to the vision and strategic plan of the University of Idaho • Non-academic program serves UI constituents and facilitates work of students, faculty and staff

  10. Synergies • Interdisciplinarity • Cooperative interactions across administrative and/or academic units

More Related