90 likes | 196 Views
AAIA PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE. 1990 Wider education world. Limited number of Government agencies – NCC, SEAC, HMI ITT devoted little time to assessment Assessment and testing seen as synonyms Little easily accessed research on impact of assessment. 1990 Schools.
E N D
AAIA PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
1990Wider education world • Limited number of Government agencies – NCC, SEAC, HMI • ITT devoted little time to assessment • Assessment and testing seen as synonyms • Little easily accessed research on impact of assessment
1990Schools • Every school had a headteacher • Headteacher had limited responsibilities and funding • Heavy reliance on the I&A service for guidance • Schools ran from 9.00-3.00/4.00 • Differentiation by outcome • Limited early years curriculum • Assessment training focused largely on NC testing • Voice of pupils little heard • Governing bodies good supportive friends of schools
1990Local Authority • LEAs did majority of inspection of schools • TVEI influencing practice • A&I service relatively isolated • Dedicated assessment staff • LEAs provided majority of curriculum services • Significant funding held at centre • Local focus on L&M in schools • Little accountability for results • ICT domain of support staff
1990 LEA advisers had: Dedicated time for assessment Teams to support assessment Funding to support assessment Considerable freedom Status and Authority
Personal vision Passion Persistence Empathy Collaboration A focus on movers and shakers Good communication Networks A critical friend Knowledge Confidence Honesty Ability to handle crisis and conflict Humility Leadership without AuthorityWhat do you need?
The FutureThreats to AAIA’s Existence • Greater LA accountability impacts on individual freedom to engage and contribute to AAIA • Dependent on voluntary activity • Falling membership • Working so closely with other bodies to the extent that we lose our independence
The FutureAAIA Strengths • Strong, articulated vision and sense of purpose • Loyal core of members • Knowledgeable members • Committed practitioners • Manageable size • Effective networks • Sharing community • Access to key personnel in other bodies