1 / 12

Future Vision of Jonathan E. Reed School

Future Vision of Jonathan E. Reed School. Gianna Gurga Future of Education- EDU 505.91. Waterbury, CT. Jonathan E. Reed School. Opened in 2012 as the third out of four “Elemiddle” schools in the city

keely-holman
Download Presentation

Future Vision of Jonathan E. Reed School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Future Vision of Jonathan E. Reed School GiannaGurga Future of Education- EDU 505.91 Waterbury, CT

  2. Jonathan E. Reed School • Opened in 2012 as the third out of four “Elemiddle” schools in the city • Racially diverse, currently serving approximately 350 students grades PK-7; 8th grade will be added 2014-2015 school year • Focuses on Math, Science, Reading and Language Arts, and Social Studies in addition to six specials • 4 co-ed intramural sports • Successful Positive Behavior Intervention and Support System (PBIS) Program; has decreased incidents of referrals

  3. Technology • Many educators are not taking advantage of the technologies afforded to them (NMC Horizon Report, 2013) • Inconsistent use of gameplay in classrooms • Recommendations • Incorporate iPads and other mobile devices in the classroom

  4. Educational Trends (Mobile Technologies) • Positive Implications for Utilization at Reed School • Captures the attention of students, making learning more meaningful • Blogging and Videoconferencing • “enable students to raise cultural awareness, know about their own cultural identities and understand and explain the cultural differences and similarities” (Erişti, 2012, p. 81). In the past 5 years mobile device ownership has made a significant increase in the lives of children ages 8-18 (Herro, Kiger, and Owens, 2013, p. 30)

  5. Economic Trends and Public Policy • “Each year, the Legislature and governor decide how much funding will go to public education and how those funds will be allocated” (Edsource, 2006, para. 1). • Recommendation(s) • Funding needs to be available and consistent throughout the state/district • Minority students are receiving proper funds, however, the decision as to how the funding is allocated depends on the geography of the situation

  6. Futuring and Scenarios • What is “futuring”? • Reed needs to take the Positive, Visionary, Evolutionary Futurist position • Allows students to become life-long learners and maximizes their development of human potential • What is the purpose of scenarios? • Work in unison with futuring • Important for Reed (elemiddle) to think of needs of all students

  7. Environmental Scanning • “Helps an organization learn about the potential influences from external environments and how it can respond strategically” (Albright, 2004, p. 40). • Recommendation(s) • Incorporate local learner and stakeholder input • Benefit/challenge • If the stakeholder is not actively involved in their child’s school life, data collection is useless.

  8. Vision for 2017 • Incorporate mobile technologies into the classroom in all subjects • GOAL: to increase student achievement levels at all grades • Videoconferencing as a key tool • Establish communication with students throughout the country and world, providing students with various skills that make them more marketable in the future

  9. Opportunities and Challenges • Opportunities • Increase in student achievement • Increase in diversity and positive communication through videoconferencing • Supports Common Core Standards • Teaches digital citizenship • Can save district money • E-Books • Challenges • District approval • High cost for technology • No time to teach how to use the technology in the classroom • Access appropriate materials • Emphasizing digital citizenship

  10. Call to Action • Students at Reed School are NOT technologically literate • Recommendations • Teachers need to be given the proper training • Administration and IT need to work together • Establish a concise system to access materials • Establish leadership or technology committee to oversee how technology is being used and to teach/assist teachers • Support between all parties involved: district, administrators at Reed, and faculty and staff

  11. References • Albright, K. (2004). Environmental scanning: radar for success. The Information ManagementJournal. 38(3), 38- 45. • Brainshare. (2012, 28 May). [Photograph of pros vs cons]. Retrieved from http://blog.brainhost.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-shared-hosting/ • Chee, Y. & Tan, K. (2012). Becoming chemists through game-based inquiry learning: the case of legends of alkhimia. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 10(2), 185-198. • Coppedge, A. (n.d.) [Photograph of mobile technologies]. Retrieved from http://anthonycoppedge.com/problog/2011/03/why-mobile-technologies-will-force-churches-to-change/ • Duhaney, D. (2000). Technology and the educational process: transforming classroom activities. International Journal of Instructional Media. 27(1), 68-72. • EdSource (2006). The school district budget process. Retrieved from http://www.edsource.org/pub_QA_BudgetProcess06.html • Erişti, S. (2012). A multi-cultural interaction through video conferencing in primary schools. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 13(3), 70-86. • Evergreen Valley Church. (n.d.) [Photograph of vision]. Retrieved from http://evcsj.com/cpt_news/the-value-of-clear-vision • Groff, L. & Smoker, P. (n.d.).  Range of futurist views and perspectives. Retrieved from  http://www.csudh.edu/global_options/IntroFSTopics.HTML

  12. References (cont.) • Herro, D., Kiger, D., & Owens, C. (2013). Mobile technology: case-based suggestions for classroom integration and teacher educators. Journal of Digital Learning In Teacher Education, 30(1), 30-40. • Hough, D. (2009). 5 findings from the first & only national data base on elemiddle & middle schools (executive summary). Middle Grades Research Journal. 4(3), 81-96. • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., and Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. • Lundt, J. (2012). A curriculum for foresight. The Futurist, 46(6), 6-8. • Mietzner, D. & Reger, G. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight.  International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning.  1(2), 220-239. • Office of the Mayor. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.waterburyct.org/content/9569/10414/ • Sobrero, P. (2004). The steps for the future. Journal of Extension. 42(3). Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2004june/comm2.php • Strategic Foresighting Associates. (2009). What is it all about. Retrieved from http://www.strategicforesighting.com/index_files/Page490.html • Waterbury Public Schools. (2013, July). The vision- present and future. Retrieved from http://www.waterbury.k12.ct.us/subsite/dist/page/vision-mission-539 • Wong, K., & Langevin, W. (2007). Policy expansion of school choice in the americanstates. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(2-3), 440-472.

More Related