1 / 18

A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning. by Deb Miller , Kansas DOT Secretary. National Forum on Performance Based Planning Dallas - September 2010. Emergence of performance measures led to formation of the Standing Committee on Performance Management (SCOPM).

keisha
Download Presentation

A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A State Perspectiveon Performance Management and Planning byDeb Miller,Kansas DOT Secretary National Forum on Performance Based Planning Dallas - September 2010

  2. Emergence of performance measures led to formation of the Standing Committee on Performance Management (SCOPM)

  3. 8 Task Forces were assigned to look at performance measures in specific areas: Safety Preservation Congestion Environment System Operations Freight/Economic Development Comparative Performance Measures Planning and Programming Process

  4. The Task Force has hosted two events

  5. It’s easy to get distracted as to why it won’t work But we need more data!!!

  6. We hold these truths to be self evident… • a performance-based approach is appropriate • a national performance-based approach is coming • DOTs and MPOs need to have a strong voice at the table

  7. Nine Workshop Themes and Ideas

  8. 1. States and Local Agencies should have a role in setting targets

  9. 2. State and local politics must be accommodated

  10. 3. There must be a balance between data-driven and qualitative decisions

  11. 4. Performance measures should be used to report progress towards national goals – and they should roll up to the national level

  12. 5. ARRA can serve as a pilot for what works in reporting

  13. 6. USDOT should represent the national interest during planning process

  14. 7. USDOT should approve the process not the targets themselves

  15. 8. The current pipelines of projects must be allowed to fit

  16. 9. Recognize that it could take a few authorization cycles before we get where we want to be

  17. A last word: Collaboration

  18. A State Perspectiveon Performance Management and Planning byDeb Miller,Kansas DOT Secretary National Forum on Performance Based Planning Dallas - September 2010

More Related