1 / 37

PETE 406 - Underbalanced Drilling, UBD

PETE 406 - Underbalanced Drilling, UBD. Lesson 9 Benefits of Underbalanced Drilling UDM - Chapter 3. Benefits of Underbalanced Drilling. Increased Penetration Rate Increased Bit Life Reduced Differential Sticking Minimize Lost Circulation Improved Formation Evaluation

kelvin
Download Presentation

PETE 406 - Underbalanced Drilling, UBD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PETE 406 - Underbalanced Drilling, UBD Lesson 9 Benefits of Underbalanced Drilling UDM - Chapter 3

  2. Benefits of Underbalanced Drilling • Increased Penetration Rate • Increased Bit Life • Reduced Differential Sticking • Minimize Lost Circulation • Improved Formation Evaluation • Reduced Formation Damage Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  3. Benefits of Underbalanced Drilling • Reduced Probability of Differential Sticking • Earlier Production • Environmental Benefits • Improved Safety • Increased Well Productivity • Less Need for Stimulation Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  4. Increased Penetration Rate • In permeable rocks, a positive differential will decrease penetration because • increases the effective confining stress which • increases the rocks shear strength • Therefore increasing shear stress (by drilling UB) increases penetration rate • and increases the chip hold down effect Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  5. Bit tooth Crack in the formation Chip hold down effect As drilling fluid enters the fracture, the pressure differential across the rock fragment decreases, releasing the chip Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  6. Effect of Pressure Differential • In permeable rocks penetration rate is a function of the differential pressure not the absolute pressure Micro-bit test Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  7. Gas drilling vs. mud drilling Mud Gas Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  8. Penetration rate as a function of the differential pressure across the workfront For permeable rocks Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  9. Penetration rate in impermeable rocks In impermeable rock, the instantaneous initial pressure in the crack itself is close to zero, i.e. the penetration rate is now a function of absolute wellbore pressure. Bit tooth Crack in the formation Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  10. Field example switching from air to mud Switch to mud Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  11. Increased Bit Life??? • Increased vibration with air drilling may actually decrease bearing life • Bit may drill fewer rotating hours but drill more footage - fewer bits Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  12. Effect of UBD on cutting structure of roller cone bits • Mechanical Specific Energy, MSE, is defined as the mechanical work that must be done to excavate a unit volume of rock Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  13. The work done by the bit is: Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  14. The volume of rock excavated per revolution is: Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  15. The mechanical specific energy is give by: Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  16. What does this mean? 1. Bit torque is not a function of borehole pressures. 2. Penetration rates generally increase with decreasing borehole pressures. 3. MSE are therefore, usually lower at lower borehole pressures Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  17. What does this mean? 4. Therefore, cutting structure wear rates (in terms of distance drilled) should be inversely related to the MSE 5. If the bit has to do less work to remove a given volume of rock, its cutting elements should wear less. 6. A bit should be able to drill more footage, when drilling underbalanced. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  18. Reduced Differential Sticking • Fs = AcDPms*144 sq.in./sq.ft. • Fs = force required to free pipe (lbf) • Ac= contact area (sq. ft) • DP= pressure differential across the mud cake (psid) • ms = coefficient of friction Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  19. Example • Contact area is 30 feet long and 0.25 ft wide • Pressure differential is 300 psid • The coefficient of friction is 0.3 • The force to free the pipe (in excess of string weight) is • 30 x 0.25 x 300 x 0.3 x 144 = 97,200 lbf • Note equation 3.5 in text is incorrect Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  20. Minimized Lost Circulation • If the pressure in the wellbore is less than the formation pressure in the entire open hole section, lost circulation will not occur. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  21. Improved Formation Evaluation • Production rates while drilling UB can be measured with no filtrate invasion occurring • No filtrate invasion can mean more accurate LWD measurements. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  22. Reduces formation damage

  23. Formation damage mechanisms during drilling (overbalanced) • Scales, sludges or emulsions due to interaction between filtrates and pore fluids • Interaction between aqueous mud filtrate and clay particles in the formation • Solids invasion Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  24. Formation damage mechanisms during drilling (overbalanced): • Phase trapping or blocking • Adsorption of drilling fluid additives, leading to permeability reductions or changes in wettability • Migration of fines • Generation of pore-blocking organic byproducts from bacteria entering the formation from the drilling fluid Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  25. Formation damage mechanisms during drilling (underbalanced): • Temporary overbalance • Spontaneous imbibition • Gravity-induced invasion • Wellbore glazing • Post-drilling damage • Mechanical degradation Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  26. Temporary overbalance • Can be intentional to: • kill well for trips, • transmit MWD surveys, • log the well, • completion and WO operations Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  27. Temporary overbalance • Can be unintentional: • Slug flow or liquid holdup causing fluctuations in annular pressure • High fluid pressures across the face of diamond and TSP bits • Near wellbore production reduces the formation pressure near the face of the wellbore Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  28. Temporary overbalance • Can be unintentional: • Varying pore pressure along the wellbore • Excessive surge pressures • Equipment malfunctions or procedural errors Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  29. Spontaneous Imbibition • Due to capillary effects - even if drilling underbalanced • The underbalance pressure necessary to prevent water from being drawn from an aqueous drilling fluid into the formation will depend on the initial formation water saturation and the pore sizes Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  30. Gravity-induced invasion • Can occur during UBD in the formation produces from natural fractures or vugs Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  31. Wellbore glazing • UBD can result in high wellbore temperatures due to the friction between the rotating drillstring and the borehole wall. • This can cause a thin low permeability “glazed” zone Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  32. Post-drilling damage • Due to: • Killing the well for completion • Cementing • Mobilization of “fines” during production • Liquid coning in gas reservoir Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  33. Mechanical degradation • Rock around the wellbore experiences a concentration of in-situ stresses due to drilling the well. • As the wellbore pressure is lowered, the effective stresses increase, • resulting in a decrease in porosity and available flow channels leading to • reduced permeability Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  34. Earlier Production • With the necessary equipment on location during UBD operations, produced fluids can go to sales. • Open-hole completions are sometimes performed. • If the well is drilled and completed underbalanced, wells from depleated reservoirs will not need swabbing. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  35. Environmental Benefits • Closed loop systems produce less wasted drilling fluids Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  36. Less Need for Stimulation • If the formation is not damaged during drilling and completion, stimulation to remove the damage will not be needed Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

  37. End of Lesson 9 Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

More Related