1 / 15

SHIPYARDS: Differences between Tankers and FPSO Specification

SHIPYARDS: Differences between Tankers and FPSO Specification. Dr. Alwyn M c Leary, Senior Surveyor, Lloyd’s Register ASIA, Singapore Office, (+65) 63704505 alwyn.mcleary@lr.org. Presentation (20mins) Discussion (10mins).

kendall
Download Presentation

SHIPYARDS: Differences between Tankers and FPSO Specification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SHIPYARDS: Differences between Tankers and FPSO Specification Dr. Alwyn McLeary, Senior Surveyor, Lloyd’s Register ASIA, Singapore Office, (+65) 63704505 alwyn.mcleary@lr.org

  2. Presentation (20mins) Discussion (10mins) • Outline a simplified model representing the FPSO Classification process • Validated the proposition that there is a lack of agreement between the shipyard tanker/FPSO specifications • Identify the key issues • Identify the gaps • Discuss the progress to date in closing these gaps • Outline a way forward

  3. REGULATORY ISSUES FEED Review Project Specification (Client) Vendor Specifications/Practices Design to Rules/Codes Experience Installation Modification Rule + Service History Design Appraisal Refine Design = Review Comments FPSO Classification Model

  4. FPSO Classification Model (Codes and Standards) FPSO Hull Mooring Topsides Heli-deck & Safety Systems Marine Systems Hull Structure Process & Utilities System Interfaces LR Rules + International Codes / Standards International Codes & Standards LR Rules

  5. Proposition: there exists a lack of agreement between shipyard tanker/FPSO specifications? YES/NO • Depends who you ask? • Generally an “interface” issue (Discipline Project Management) • Hull (shipbuilding standards + FPSO-Specific Loadings) • Everything else (offshore standards) • But majority of the project assembled in a shipyard • Regulatory Issues Govern

  6. Key Issues • Regulatory Requirements • Interface (problems on previous projects) Physical Code/Specification Contractual • FPSO-Specific Loadings based approval (Site- & Operational-Specific Loadings)

  7. Regulatory Requirements • Coastal State Authority and National Authority (National Administrations) requirements regarding applicable codes and standards (and dates/versions) govern and requires to be defined at the outset (e.g. SOLAS, MARPOL, Loadline, Tonnage). PMA? • If the vessel will disconnect and sail under own power then there may be two sets of requirements to be met (will require to be Flagged). The most onerous for individual systems will govern. • At present no clear universal Regulatory requirements for FPSOs established.

  8. Interface Problem Areas • Escape and access routes, particularly configuration of ladders, etc • Tank entry requirements (in operations), PMA • Is MARPOL, SOLAS and LOADLINE applicable • NDT requirements based on code compliance at interface • Tolerances at interface • Hazardous Area definition • Drgs. with lines detailing the extent of responsibility?

  9. West of Shetland Hs Northern North Sea Central North Sea Tp Environmental Criteria: Site-specific100 Year Joint Probability Contours

  10. LR FOIFL Rule, Requirement LR Ship Rule, Requirement Strength: Site Specific WSF(for harsh environment)

  11. Gaps • Tendency to “re-invent the wheel” (not learning from previous projects) • 80% of Problems due to 20% of Causes (Ref. 1), Project Management and Contracting are Key Elements • Harmonisation of Regulatory Requirements • Specification Definition (defining interfaces), FPSO/JTP Future Alignment • Interface Management (point 2 above) Physical, Code, Contractual Ref. 1: “Capturing Lessons Learned During FPSO Projects”, JR Still, The Naval Architect, January 2004, pp19-22.

  12. Progress in Closing Gaps • Lloyd’s Register Group works closely with FPSO clients to identify potential interface problems at an early stage in the project (e.g. FEED Review). • Continuous Rule development and internal R&D activities as well as participation in various JIPs over a number of years (e.g. FPSO-Specific Loadings Project, + future planning of alignment with JTP). • Preparation of Guidance Notes expanding Rule requirements and identifying important considerations (e.g. LR Group Guidance Note “FPSO INSTALLATIONS – AN OVERVIEW OF REGULATORY ISSUES”, OS/GN/99001).

  13. Way Forward Industry Driven Harmonisation of Regulatory Requirements Lessons Learnt Exchange Between FPSO Owners/Operators (FPSOForum is probably already effective in this area) Alignment of Future JTP based Tanker Rules and FPSO Design Apprasial Processes (Increased Transparency in Loading Assessment)

  14. Summary FPSO’s - NOT JUST A TANKER WITH SOME EQUIPMENT ON DECK! REGULATORY ISSUES GOVERN (NO CLEAR SET OF REGULATIONS APPLY) MANAGEMENT OF VARIOUS INTERFACES VERY IMPORTANT FPSO-SPECIFIC LOADINGS ALIGNMENT TO FUTURE JTP RULES?

  15. Contact Alwyn McLeary Senior Surveyor Lloyd’s Register ASIA, Singapore Office, Tel: (+65) 63704505 Email: alwyn.mcleary@lr.org Alastair H Jones Oil and Gas Business Manager ASIA Lloyd’s Register ASIA, Singapore Office, Tel: (+65) 63704552 Email: alastair.jones@lr.org

More Related