590 likes | 728 Views
RFT and evolution: are memetics the missing link?. Marco Kleen, psychologist PsyAdvies / BrainDynamics University of Groningen. 2009 150th aniversary of On The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin. Does relational framing increase genetic fitness?.
E N D
RFT and evolution: are memetics the missing link? Marco Kleen, psychologist PsyAdvies / BrainDynamics University of Groningen
2009150th aniversary of On The Origin of Speciesby Charles Darwin
Does relational framing increase genetic fitness? marcokleen@hotmail.com
"behavior analysts think of the shaping of behavior as working in just the same way as the evolution of species" (Baum, 1994, p. 64). marcokleen@hotmail.com
“Both the evolution of species and the evolution of behavior can be described as selection by consequences”(Skinner, 1981) marcokleen@hotmail.com
Selectionism involves an emphasis on the role historical context and consequences play in shaping the form and function of the phenomenon of interest in the current setting—an emphasis that clearly reflects both the root metaphor and truth criterion of contextualism (Fox, 2005, contextualpsychology.org) marcokleen@hotmail.com
Science Art Technique marcokleen@hotmail.com Philosophy
Shelter Medicine GENETIC FITNESS marcokleen@hotmail.com Communication
Destructive normality marcokleen@hotmail.com
Psychopathology Genocide Self-sterilizing behavior Terrorism X GENETIC FITNESS?? Warfare marcokleen@hotmail.com
“Cui bono?” (Dennett) (who profits?) marcokleen@hotmail.com
What is the function of contragenetic behavior? marcokleen@hotmail.com
Evolutionairy algorithm (Darwin, 1859) • If there is variety… • and if there is selection… • and if there is heredity… • ..then there MUST be evolution marcokleen@hotmail.com
Common misconceptions about evolution • Evolution has a goal (= “intelligent design”) • Humans are evolved from apes (= describing evolution as a lineair process) • Evolution is only about genes marcokleen@hotmail.com
“Darwinism is too big a theory to be confined to the narrow context of the gene” Richard Dawkins, 1976 marcokleen@hotmail.com
Is the gene the only replicator? marcokleen@hotmail.com
The second replicator: the meme marcokleen@hotmail.com
What is a meme? • Any piece of information that has the ability to replicate itself through imitation • “Imitation, to mime” meme (Dawkins, 1976) • “Unit of cultural evolution” • Infectious ideas • Analogy: parasite marcokleen@hotmail.com
Example 1. “I just can’t get you out of my head” (Kylie Minogue, 2002) marcokleen@hotmail.com
Imitation • Vertical: from one generation to the next • Horizontal: spreading of contagious ideas within one generation marcokleen@hotmail.com
Meme-cariers • Anology: meme-memecarrier, gene-genotype • Human brains • Media: books, CD’s, DVD’s, internet • Buildings, fashion, music, cultural manifestations, lectures, congresses, discussions marcokleen@hotmail.com
Mutationoriginal: “5th symphony”(Beethoven) marcokleen@hotmail.com
Mutationmutation: “5th symphony”(Steve Vai) marcokleen@hotmail.com
The Wuppie-meme (Weeple) 1981- 2005 dormant period, 2006 mutations (color+ size) ± 1970 US 1980 Netherlands 2006-2007 dormant period, 2008 major mutation 2006 Netherlands: WK (worldcup) wuppie and ‘megawuppie’ 2008 Netherlands: EK welpie marcokleen@hotmail.com
Memetic fitness • Fidelity: the more faithful a copy, the more of the original information remains • Fecundity: the faster the rate of copying, the more the meme will spread • Longevity: the longer a meme survives, the more copies can be made from it. marcokleen@hotmail.com
Copy the product vscopy the instruction • Example: Dutch stue • Copying the instruction only possible in organisms that are able to frame relationally (use language) marcokleen@hotmail.com
Meme-gene coevolution • Memetic drive (Blackmore, 1999) • Selection of brains that are good in imitating (mirror neurons!) • ‘big brain’ theory physical adaptation of the brain, relatively big neocortex marcokleen@hotmail.com
Genes vs Memes • The ‘genetic leash’ (Lumsden & Wilson) seems to be broken memetic replication does not have to be good for genes marcokleen@hotmail.com
GENES Culture/memes marcokleen@hotmail.com
GENES Culture/memes marcokleen@hotmail.com
GENES Culture/memes Culture/memes marcokleen@hotmail.com
Contragenetic behavior • The ‘genetic leash’ (Lumsden & Wilson) seems to be broken memetic replication does not have to be good for genes • Memes are selfish: their only goal is to get replicated as much as possible marcokleen@hotmail.com
Who profits? Memes marcokleen@hotmail.com
RFT and memetics are highly complementary theories which explain each other’s missing links marcokleen@hotmail.com
RFT and Memetics RFT Memetics Selectionistic foundation Explains complex human behavior Psychological mechanism of imitation unclear • Selectionistic foundation • Explains complex human behavior • Evolutionairy function of contragenetic behavior unclear The Missing Link marcokleen@hotmail.com
Hypothesis: Relational framing increases chance of memetic reproduction marcokleen@hotmail.com
Mechanisms • Stimulus Relational Framing activation of bigger cognitive network transformation of stimulusfunction reproduction of memes marcokleen@hotmail.com
DANGER Relationalresponding…. Dixon et al (2003) marcokleen@hotmail.com
..results in reproduction of memes marcokleen@hotmail.com
DANGER Relationalresponding…. Theo van Gogh 1957-2004 marcokleen@hotmail.com
..results in reproduction of memes Translation: “The cross will not make place for the mosque” Mr. Wilders marcokleen@hotmail.com