380 likes | 594 Views
The Bill of Rights. Citizenship and the Protection of Individual Liberties. citizenship. History of citizenship Dred Scott case (1857) Citizenship could only be claimed by descendants of state citizens (as of 1788) or through naturalization. citizenship. 14 th amendment (1868)
E N D
The Bill of Rights Citizenship and the Protection of Individual Liberties
citizenship • History of citizenship • Dred Scott case (1857) • Citizenship could only be claimed by descendants of state citizens (as of 1788) or through naturalization
citizenship • 14th amendment (1868) • “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside…” • Jus soli “law of the soil” ~ born in the US • Jus sanguini “law of blood” ~ born abroad to US citizens, residency requirement • Naturalization process~ immigrants who apply
citizenship • Naturalization process (cont’d) • 1: apply • 2: background check of good moral character • 3: test of US history and government • 4: test of basic English literacy • 5: taking an oath of allegiance
citizenship • Loss of Citizenship • Only the federal government can both grant and take away citizenship; state governments can take away the privileges of citizenship • Ex. You can lose your right to vote when incarcerated or having served time for certain felonies
Citizenship • Loss of Citizenship • Expatriation • Giving up your citizenship by living in a foreign country AND taking their oath of allegiance • Punishment for certain federal crimes • Treason, rebellion, acts of “extreme disloyalty” • De-naturalization • Being fraudulent in the naturalization process
1st amendment & Religion • The Establishment Clause • (def) part of the 1st amendment that prohibits Congress from establishing a “National” Church
1st amendment & religion • Supreme Court Actions • 1971 Lemon v. Kurtzman • As a result of this case, the Supreme Court devised the Lemon Test to see if a law violated the establishment clause • 1: does it have a secular purpose ? • 2: is it religiously neutral ? • 3: does it prevent excessive entanglement between government & religion ?
1st amendment & religion • Supreme Court Actions • 1990 the Endorsement Test • Created as an attempt to simplify the Lemon Test • Allows gov’t involvement in religion AS LONG AS gov’t does not endorse one religion over another
1st amendment & religion • Religion & Public Spaces • 1968~ school sanctioned prayer is unconstitutional • 1980~ posting the 10 commandments in classrooms is unconstitutional • 1987~ cannot force public schools to teach creationism
1st amendment & religion • Religion & Public Spaces • 1990~ religious groups have the right to access school facilities • 1992~ no clergy led prayer at graduation ceremonies • 2000~ upheld a federal provision to provide computer equipment to all schools (public and private)
1st amendment & religion • Free Exercise Clause • (def) the ability to practice religion without government interference • 1940 Cantwell v. Connecticut ~ the Supreme Court determined that a state may interfere IF they have compelling state interest to do so • Ex. Human sacrifice ≠ free exercise • Ex. Santeria = free exercise
1st amendment & speech • Is freedom of speech an absolute right ?
1st amendment & speech • Background • Originally intended to protect political speech, freedom of speech has expanded to include “expression” and symbolic speech • James Madison, in Federalist #10, stated that free political speech helps prevent violence in society. Open discussions and political participation among citizens are essential to self-government.
1st amendment & speech • Landmark Supreme Court Cases • Schenk v. United States (1919) • The Supreme Court ruled that the country’s interest in fighting WWI outweighed Schenk’s right to free speech.
1st amendment & speech • Landmark Supreme Court Cases • Garrison v. Louisiana (1964) • The Supreme Court reaffirmed the right to free speech and open discussion by ruling in favor of Garrison.
1st amendment & speech • Landmark Supreme Court Cases • Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) • the Supreme Court ruled that the 1st amendment protects even the most extreme form of criticism unless the speaker is calling for “IMMINENT lawless action”
1st amendment & speech • Landmark Supreme Court Cases • Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) • A public school could not suspend students for wearing plain black armbands in protest of a war. Armbands were seen as “akin to pure speech”
1st amendment & speech • Landmark Supreme Court Cases • Texas v. Johnson (1989) • The Supreme Court ruled that burning of an American flag is a form of symbolic speech and is therefore protected.
1st amendment & speech • Types of speech & expression • Indecent Speech: speech that contains suggestive sexual (or other) references • **may be regulated** • Obscene Speech • Speech that contains material that is offensive and contains no redeeming social value • Society has the right to be protected from such speech • Local governments are expected to decide
1st amendment & speech • Types of speech & expression • Preferred Speech • Because of the position free speech holds in regard to our form of government and political participation, the Supreme Court has elevated speech to a higher position over other rights • Free speech is considered the basis of all other liberties
1st amendment & speech • Types of speech & expression • Symbolic Speech • Armbands, flag burning…. Actions and/or symbols used to express opinions
Bill of Rights & Rights of the Accused in Criminal Procedure • “It is more dangerous that a guilty person should be punished, without the forms of law, than that he should escape.” • Thomas Jefferson, 1788
Criminal procedure • 4th amendment • Search warrants to be issued only with probable cause and with a specific person or place to be searched and the evidence sought • The Exclusionary Rule • Knowledge or evidence gained from an illegal search may not be used in trial …. Initially only applied to the federal government … BUT
Criminal procedure • Enforcement of the 4thamendment • 1961 Mapp v. Ohio the exclusionary rule was made universal to both the federal and state levels. • However, • Illegally seized evidence has been allowed at grand jury testimony to obtain an indictment • Still a controversial issue!
Criminal procedure • 5th amendment • Due Process Rights • Procedural due process is protected under the 5th amendment • Government must follow a set procedure when applying the law and it must be applied the same each time
Criminal procedure • Side Note…… • 14th amendment • Also protects due process • Substantive due process is protected under the 14th amendment • Courts must look beyond procedure to make sure the substance of laws are inherently fair and equal to all people • Ex. Plessy v. Ferguson • Procedurally constitutional • Substantively unconstitutional Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Criminal procedure • 5th amendment (cont’d) • Protection against double jeopardy • Protection against self incrimination • Requires a grand jury indictment for federal level crimes
Criminal procedure • 6th amendment • Right to a jury trial • Right to a speedy trial • Right to know the crime for which one is accused • Right to confront witnesses against you & to call witness on your behalf • Right to the assistance of an attorney
Criminal procedure • 8th amendment • Executions must be as swift and painless as possible (does not say this; but this is how it has been interpreted) • Punishment cannot be cruel or unusual • Monetary penalties must fit the crime and not be excessive
Criminal procedure & juries • Can a randomly selected jury be as competent in determining guilt or innocence as a legally trained judge ?
Criminal procedure & juries • Historical Background • Jury duty is considered the role & responsibility of a citizen in a free society • Jurors cannot be punished for a verdict
Criminal procedure • Trials & juries • Trials must be open to the media • Juries must be impartial or moved when “prejudicial publicity” exists • Grand Jury • Used at the federal level, not required at the state level (New York does use it for some cases) • Can only indict • Grand juries can have approx 25 members
Criminal procedure & juries • Special Power of Juries • Nullification • When juries refuse to convict a defendant for breaking a law they consider to be unjust • Examples: • 1800’s ~ Fugitive Slave Act • 1960’s & 70’s ~draft evaders during Vietnam War • Present ~euthanasia cases (Terry Schiavo)
Criminal procedure & juries • Jury Selection • 1. Summons – must represent a fair cross section of society • 2. Voir Dire – to determine fitness, potential jurors are questioned • 3. Empanel – 12 jurors + 2 alternates • **the summons must represent a fair cross section but the panel chosen may not**
Criminal procedure & juries • Jury Responsibilities • Listen impartially • Keep an open mind • Deliberate with other jurors • Apply the law • Reach a verdict
Criminal procedure & juries • Special Cases • Hung jury • When jurors cannot reach a unanimous verdict and are deadlocked after extensive deliberation • A mistrial is declared • The defendant may be retried with a new jury…. Double jeopardy does NOT apply here because a verdict was never reached
Wrap up • There are many parts of the Bill of Rights that we did not cover • Petition & Assembly (1st amendment) • Right to bear arms (2nd amendment) • Eminent domain (5th amendment) • Civil trials (7th amendment) • These are still options for your upcoming project if they interest you!