170 likes | 329 Views
ITU Workshop on “Standardization on IMT, M2M, IoT, Cloud Computing and SDN ” (Algiers, Algeria, 8 September 2013). SDN and its standardization. Takashi Egawa t-egawa@ct.jp.nec.com NEC Corporation ITU-T Rapporteur, Q . 14 / 13. Software-Defined Networking (SDN).
E N D
ITU Workshop on “Standardization on IMT, M2M, IoT, Cloud Computing and SDN” (Algiers, Algeria, 8 September 2013) SDN and its standardization Takashi Egawa t-egawa@ct.jp.nec.com NECCorporation ITU-T Rapporteur, Q.14/13
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Your program (software) defines networks Your program (software) Commands to provision, control, manage Open Interface ICT resources switches links processors storages …. • Open interface is provided for network resources • You define how switches and others behave • e.g., if packet header field xxx matches xxx, the packet is forwarded (switch), or discarded (proprietary firewall) • e.g., an application notifies your program security breach is found. Your program disable a link (port) to isolate it • e.g.,yourprocessor(virtualmachine)notices…
Issues to make SDN effective (1) Open interface must be easy to understand & use Typical network software architecture: various software in various layers Which interface? What function? What parameter? • The target of the interface; what to control/manage? • Flow table in switches? (OpenFlow protocol’s approach) • Routing table in routers? • Controller itself? • Resource abstraction: how they should be modeled? • e.g., resources provided at controller level: ‘link: node A to B’? ‘information flow pipe to end-users living in Tokyo’? …
Issues to make SDN effective (2) Open interface must be easy to implement Control function Logically one entity multiplecontroller fore.g.,redundancy controller controller Different physical entity OpenInterface ICTresource ICTresource ICTresource ICTresource ICTresource Control plane and data plane should be separated Controlfunctionshould be logically centralized
Core concepts of SDN are very old • A textbook written in ‘80s discussed ‘software definable network’ • at concept-level, such idea always existed • Virtually all equipment of today has open interface (I/F) • Huge number of control I/F and management I/F has been developed, standardized, and used • Programs has been using these I/F, and automating operations • C/D separation has been common in telco for many years • In telecom carrier networks,control = operater’s. data = customer’s. Some sort of separation is a MUST
Time to revisit SDN concept Technologies, requirements that makes SDN useful Virtualizationit is becoming popular, in particular in data-centers OpenFlow protocolit destroyed ‘distribution = just’ illusion CustomizationTraditional IP network is difficult to customize. But if possible, …
Items that makes SDN useful (1): Virtualization (1) To make everything virtual is a long-time dream Abundant computers, enormous processing power, ubiquitous links, switches, abundant storages, … are shared among purposes/customers… Purpose Purpose Purpose Temporary, local ICT system Global ICT infrastructure Highly secure, closed network If we could make a pool of network resources and realize everything as its instances…(servers, firewalls, all appliances are specialized computers. If you can ignore performance, non-specialized computers can become anything) Then we are free from hardware restrictions!all difficulties will go to complicated system|software architecture, and its management
Items that makes SDN useful (1): Virtualization (2) • Many ICT resources are becoming REALLY abundant • CPU performance is still increasing, end-users don’t care it anymore • The amount of memory and storage are still increasing • Access links are fast enough to be shared among multiple purposesGbps access is too much for email and simple web! • OK, let’s invent a way to use themIsolation and/or separation are a good way to achieve it --- we human love ‘territory’ • Computing resources are already virtualized. Network’s turn • Data-centers created a market for virtualization. Time to expand the market by applying it to other areas
Items that makes SDN useful (2): OpenFlow protocol • OpenFlow protocol destroyed the myth of ‘distributed system is good’ • It was a sort of religion • OpenFlow-based system showed centralized system is sometimes very efficient and fast • Now we are free!Good time to re-visit fundamental telco network architecture • If distributed is preferable, let’s use it.If centralized is efficient, let’s use it.
Items that makes SDN useful (3): Customization • Customization is becoming even more important • More customer, application, traffic are in the networks • Customized traffic engineering is really necessary • OpenFlow has shown the possibility We may now able to realize service-aware networks
In SDN, there are so many different voices. ITU is now trying to capture the essence, and started SDN standardization for telecom carriers
Various activities discuss specific part of SDN OSS Each cloud service SDO Applications Open Stack Cloud stack Network Services OpenDaylight management User Terminal ETSI NFV SG11, 13 IETF BBF Core transport ONF Access transport TMF Q.12/15 OIF Collaboration among SDOs/open source activities critical. JointCoordinationActivityonSDN(JCA-SDN) established ITU-Tdiscuss overall architecture of carrier networks
SDN related activity in ITU-T SG13 and other SGs • In SG13, SDN,network virtualization,iSCP had been discussed • Future Networks uses SDN and network virtualization as technologies to combat ever-increasing servicesDescribed in Y.3001, 3011 and others • iSCP(independent Scalable Control Plane, counterpart of IETF Forces) forcontrol/dataseparationDescribed inY.2621,2622 • The discussion on SDN itself has started • SDN Framework document is now under development A brief document that defines what is SDN from ITU viewpoint, and what ITU should do • Discussion to apply SDN to NICE started (Y.S-NICE-reqts) • SG11 is discussing SDN signaling • SG15, 17 is interested in SDN
List of ITU-T SDN-related work items • SG13 • Y.2621(Requirements of independent Scalable Control Plane (iSCP) in FPBN) • Y.2622(Architecture of an independent scalable control plane in future packet based networks) • Y.3001 (Future networks: Objectives and design goals):fin, 2011/05 • Y.3011 (Framework of network virtualization for future networks):fin, 2011/09 • Y.FNvirtreq (Requirement of network virtualization for Future Networks):target 2013/11 • Y.SDN-FR (Framework of SDN):target 2013/11 • Y.FNsdn-fm (Requirements of formal specification and verification methods for software-defined networking):target 2014/07 • Y.Sup-SDNusecases(Supplement for use-cases of telecom SDN):target 2014/07 • Y.S-NICE-reqts (Requirements and capability framework for NICE implementation making usage of software-defined networking technologies):target 2014/09 • SG11 • Q.SBAN(Scenarios and signaling requirements for software-defined BAN (SBAN)):target 2014/11 • Q.Supplement-SDN(Framework of signalling for SDN):target 2014/11 • Q.IPv6UIP(Scenarios and signalling requirements of unified intelligent programmable interface for IPv6):target 2014/12 • Discussions exists at SG15Q.12, and SG17
SG13’s roadmap Open stack, Cloud stack ETSI ITU - T SDN NFV ONF OIF TMF IETF BBF Gaps Collaboration and coordination Common Common SDN SDN 2013 2014 2015 ~ 2016 Y.SDN - FR Q14/13 Functional requirements and architectures Functional requirements of ITU - T SDN Q14/13 Q14/13 of common SDN Functional architectures and mechanisms New1/13 of ITU - T SDN Analysis of Regulatory implications New2/13 Use Cases Qs/13 of SDN and future networks SDN Interworking requirements and functions Q11/13 Common capabilities ( QoS , Security, Mobility) and Q 6,8,9/13 mechanisms to support SDN Use of SDN into existing networks such as NGN - e Q2, 3/13 Figure from TD-18 (TSAG) Basic common part as ‘common SDN’ Will discuss ITU-T specific SDN in various groups (Qs)
Conclusion • SDN enables you to define networks with software • If you write programs, you have enormous freedom • Many issues remains to make good open programming I/F • Where should be the I/F? What resource model? … • SDN has historical basis • Now emerging thanks to virtualization and others • Many SDOs are contributing to SDN in their area • ITU-T will provide the total view for carrier networks • Collaboration will be provided through JCA-SDN • ITU-T SG13 and other SGs started discussion • SDN framework Recommendation is the 1st target