1 / 21

NIH Update

NIH Update. Wendy L. Johnson-Askew, Ph.D., MPH, RD Public Health Nutrition/Health Policy Advisor NIH/Division of Nutrition Research Coordination. DHHS Network Analysis for Obesity. Nickolas Christakis et al. JAMA July 2007 Identification of Key Players by agency and discipline

kerri
Download Presentation

NIH Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NIH Update Wendy L. Johnson-Askew, Ph.D., MPH, RD Public Health Nutrition/Health Policy Advisor NIH/Division of Nutrition Research Coordination

  2. DHHS Network Analysis for Obesity

  3. Nickolas Christakis et al. JAMA July 2007 • Identification of Key Players by agency and discipline • Found out who communicated with who • Identify gaps in communications • Develop strategies for closing gaps

  4. Perceptions of Weight Status by Overweight • Comparison of NHANES III and NHANES 1999-2004 • Only at those with BMI >25 (measured) • Survey responses to Perception of weight status (just right, under weight, overweight)

  5. Percent of Overweight Adults Who Perceived Themselves to be Overweight, by Gender

  6. Percent of Overweight Adults Who Perceive Themselves to be Overweight by Race/Ethnicity and Gender a: Indicates a statistically significant difference in perception from the race/ethnic reference group (non-Hispanic whites) within each survey period, p<0.05 Gold: Indicates a statistically significant difference in perception across survey periods, p <0.05

  7. Percent of Overweight Adults Who Perceive Themselves to be Overweight by Age and Gender a: Indicates a statistically significant difference in perception from the race/ethnic reference group (Ages 20-34) within each survey period, p<0.05 gold: Indicates a statistically significant difference in perception across survey periods, p <0.05

  8. Percent of Overweight Adults who Perceive Themselves to be Overweight by Race/Ethnicity and Income a: Indicates a statistically significant difference in perception from reference group, PIR 0-185%), within each survey period, p<0.05 Gold: Indicates a statistically significant difference in perception across survey periods, p<0.05

  9. http://www3.niddk.nih.gov/fund/other/decision2008

  10. Meeting Objective: To discuss the state of research in decision making and examine those areas that can potentially be applied to the field of nutrition, especially in the area of sustaining positive behavior change and to stimulating research To discuss the state of research in decision making and examine those areas that can potentially be applied to the field of nutrition, especially in the area of sustaining positive behavior change and to stimulating research interest in this area. .

  11. Meeting Sessions • Understanding Different Routes to a Decision: The "Reasoned" vs. the "Reactive" Path of Decision Making • Understanding the Interplay between Physiological Responses to Food and People's Affective/Cognitive Beliefs about Food • Understanding Decision Making in an Interpersonal and Family Systems Context • Understanding the Potential Impact of Environmental Factors and Socio-cultural Factors on Food Decision Making (Food Availability, Advertising, and Time Culture)

  12. Strategic Plan for NIH Obesity Research • Posted atwww.obesityresearch.nih.gov

  13. Healthy People 2020 Process

  14. 2010 Launch Midcourse Review Final Review 2000 2005 2010 Progress Reviews Progress Reviews 2020 Development 2020 Launch Where Are We Going? 14

  15. Healthy People 2020: A Starting Point Proposed Organizing Framework Focus areas Primary: Risk factors and determinants of health Secondary: Diseases and disorders Emphasis on Public Health Priorities Health IT Preparedness Prevention 15

  16. Healthy People 2020:Stakeholder Input Secretary’s Advisory Committee on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives for 2020 Regional Meetings Public Comment periods Federal Interagency Workgroup 16

  17. Healthy People 2020:Key Dates 2007, 2008, 2009 Development of framework and objectives Continued public input Late 2008, early 2009 Framework released 2010 Final 2020 objectives released 17

  18. Healthy People 2020 Stay Informed Join the Healthy People listserve Check www.healthypeople.gov for updates 18

  19. Healthy Youth For a Healthy Future

  20. Thanks for listening Questions?

More Related