1 / 24

Ongoing work within the Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College, London

UKCCSC meeting, Newcastle University, 17/09/2007. Ongoing work within the Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College, London. Mathieu Lucquiaud, Hannah Chalmers, Jon Gibbins. WHAT WE’VE BEEN DOING. CAPTURE-READY IEA GHG Report (2007-4) CO 2 Capture-ready plants has been released

kerryn
Download Presentation

Ongoing work within the Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College, London

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UKCCSC meeting, Newcastle University, 17/09/2007 Ongoing work within the Mechanical Engineering Department,Imperial College, London Mathieu Lucquiaud, Hannah Chalmers, Jon Gibbins

  2. WHAT WE’VE BEEN DOING • CAPTURE-READY • IEA GHG Report (2007-4) CO2 Capture-ready plants has been released • Peer-reviewed paper on Capture-Ready plants to be presented at • ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, November 2007, Seattle, US

  3. WHAT WE’VE BEEN DOING • PLANT FLEXIBILITY • 2 Conference papers on plant flexibility: • 3rd International Conference on Clean Coal Technologies for our Future, Cagliari, Italy, May 2007 • 7th International Charles Parsons Turbine Conference Power Generation in an Era of Climate Change • DTI 407: Coal-fired Advanced Supercritical Boiler/Turbine – Retrofit With CO2 Capture Deliverable Db3: Economic Performance. • Includes assessment of plant flexibility

  4. WHAT WE’VE BEEN DOING • ONGOING WORK ON CCS IN CHINA/IGCC • Jon to complete tomorrow

  5. PLANT FLEXIBILITY • Potential for flexible operation of power plant

  6. Electricity grid balancing mechanism • In liberalised electricity markets like the UK electricity contracts are placed directly between suppliers and consumers (1/2h blocks of generation) • 1h before real-time positions must be notified to the system operator => gate closure. • The system operator becomes the only purchaser of electricity.

  7. Electricity grid balancing mechanism • The role of the system operator is to balance the grid • If contracted positions are not met • In case of an unexpected event (plant outage, sudden change in demand) • The system contracts reserve generation to power generators

  8. Electricity grid balancing mechanism • Operating reserve: • Primary response: very quick response to variation of demand (a few minutes). Allows for the secondary response to react • Secondary response: Quick response. Allow the primary response to resume to normal condition. Can sustain load. • Standing reserve: • provide cover for unavailable plant over a period of hours. Contracted 24h in advance.

  9. PEAK PLANT Demand MID-MERIT PLANT BASE LOAD PLANT Electricity system balancing mechanism • Large fossil fuel plants already provide some of these services to the grid

  10. PEAK PLANT MID-MERIT PLANT Demand BASE LOAD PLANT + WIND POWER Electricity system balancing mechanism • Wind power level of penetration of the grid will increase in future (Renewable target)

  11. INTRODUCTION • Flexible operation of pulverised coalpower plants with CO2 Capture

  12. Temporary additional plant output – CO2 venting in flue gas • Alter the penalty efficiency to generate more power at times when electricity value is high.

  13. Flexibility Variation in electricity prices between gate closure and real-time on a daily basis

  14. CO2 venting/ Solvent storage Operating choice will depends on electricity price Rapid changes but also CO2 price !!! Slow changes Figure from Chalmers and Gibbins (2007) Initial evaluation of the impact of post combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance, Fuel, in-press

  15. Temporary additional plant output – CO2 venting in flue gas • Alter the penalty efficiency to generate more power at times when electricity value is high. • How to proceed? • By-pass the solvent reboiler • Extra steam flow to the LP turbine • Shut down the compression train • Absorber bypass valve to stack opened for extended venting and complete venting => Sustain load • Warm standby without bypass (with blower & pump power required) for shorter periods or partial venting => Keep the ability to re-capture CO2 quickly

  16. Solvent storage • CO2 venting generates additional CO2 emissions • Depending on legislation or CO2 prices this may not be worth doing. • => Solvent storage and delayed regeneration

  17. Solvent tank 1 ~30-100ºC ~130-140ºC Solvent tank 2 Heat for CO2 release CO2-lean solvent Cooling water Power for CO2 compression Clean Flue gas from FGD Steam + CO2 CO2-rich solvent Condensate from CO2 Low-grade heat available to stack SCRUBBER STRIPPER SOLVENT REBOILER FLUE GAS COOLER Dry CO2 ready for transport

  18. Additional solvent regeneration • After storage solvent would be regenerated when electricity prices are low (at nights) when plant efficiency matters less

  19. Solvent tank 1 Heat for CO2 release CO2-lean solvent Cooling water Power for CO2 compression Clean Flue gas from FGD Steam + CO2 CO2-rich solvent Condensate from CO2 Low-grade heat available ~30-100ºC to stack SCRUBBER STRIPPER SOLVENT REBOILER FLUE GAS COOLER Solvent tank 2 Dry CO2 ready for transport

  20. Technical issues • The extra flow to the LP turbine increases the pressure at the IP/LP crossover up to 7.1 bar • Throttling the reboiler line is required • Increase of numbers of shutdown/start-up procedures of the compression train => fatigue of equipment • The turbine blades/bearings have to be reinforced

  21. Technical issues • Extra cooling capacity is required in the condenser • Extra generator capacity required • The LP turbine has to be oversized • => Need extra investment • => But required extra capacities may already exist in a plant retrofitted with capture

  22. Conclusions • The capture plant can provide additional flexibility to a PC plant with post-combustion CO2 capture. • Indefinite extra capacity with CO2 venting • ‘Pumped-storage’ capability with solvent storage and no CO2 venting • Increase the load factor of the plant • Generate additional sources of revenue • Mitigate costs of capture

  23. ANY QUESTIONS? Acknowledgements: DTI 407 project participants, BCURA, UK Carbon Capture and Storage Consortium Martin Lord, Alstom Power UK

  24. Technical issues • At part-load need to maintain LP inlet minimum mass flow to protect turbine • Equipment (stripper, reboiler and compressors) has to be oversized • Size: 2 tanks of 40m (or 4 at 10m) x 33m diameter for 8h storage capacity. • Transport issues related to a non-constant flow of CO2 => Buffer capacity required.

More Related