1 / 5

C Hendricks Brown, U Miami Patti Chamberlain, Ctr for Res to Practice Jeanne Poduska, Am Inst Res

Improving the Implementation of Evidence-based Programs That Respond to Community and Research Needs. C Hendricks Brown, U Miami Patti Chamberlain, Ctr for Res to Practice Jeanne Poduska, Am Inst Res Peter Wyman, U Rochester. Implementation Questions. Common Implementation Research Questions.

kesler
Download Presentation

C Hendricks Brown, U Miami Patti Chamberlain, Ctr for Res to Practice Jeanne Poduska, Am Inst Res

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving the Implementation of Evidence-based Programs That Respond to Community and Research Needs C Hendricks Brown, U Miami Patti Chamberlain, Ctr for Res to Practice Jeanne Poduska, Am Inst Res Peter Wyman, U Rochester

  2. Implementation Questions Connecting the Dots: Hopkins

  3. Common Implementation Research Questions How to test whether intervention effects are sustained as supports are lifted? How to increase the adoption of a program, by communities as well as individuals? Does adaptation change outcomes? What support structures lead to successful implementation, high fidelity, and sustainability? Connecting the Dots: Hopkins

  4. What things are Unique about Implementation Trials 1. The Role of Partnership between Community, Institution, and Researchers Communities and Institutions “Everyone must get this program” Researchers Rigorous design to produce relevant causal inferences Human Subjects Protection IRB, Institutional Safety, DSMB Connecting the Dots: Hopkins

  5. It is possible to design/conduct Rigorous Trials addressing Implementation Questions CAL-40 Trial (Chamberlain) -- NIMH Test strategy to Improve the county-wide adoption rate of an evidence-based program -- randomize 40 counties Whole Day Trial: (Poduska) -- NIDA Test effectiveness, sustainability, and scalability of an integrated whole day intervention in first grade -- randomize classrooms/teachers Georgia Gatekeeper Trial (Wyman and Brown) -- NIMH Test effectiveness of QPR as it is “rolled out” in a community. -- randomize middle and high schools Sources of Strength Trial (Wyman and Brown) – SAMHSA, NIMH Test mediators, effectiveness, and sustainability of Sources of Strength for suicide prevention. -- randomize schools Connecting the Dots: Hopkins

More Related