1 / 8

The Thirteenth Directive and Takeover Regulation in Italy

The Thirteenth Directive and Takeover Regulation in Italy. Marco Ventoruzzo Università Commerciale L. Bocconi, Milano. “The Future for Takeovers in the EU: Implementation of the Takeover Directive” BIICL, London, May 12, 2006.

kevin-blake
Download Presentation

The Thirteenth Directive and Takeover Regulation in Italy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Thirteenth Directive and Takeover Regulation in Italy Marco Ventoruzzo Università Commerciale L. Bocconi, Milano “The Future for Takeovers in the EU: Implementation of the Takeover Directive” BIICL, London, May 12, 2006

  2. Key provisions of the Thirteenth Directive and Their Potential Impact on Italian law • Event triggering the compulsory tender offer: threshold, extensions, exemptions (art. 5); • Conditions of the compulsory tender offer: in particular, the price (art. 5); • Action in concert (art. 2); • Passivity rule (art. 9 & art. 12); • Breakthrough rule (art. 11 & art. 12); • sell-out and squeeze-out (art. 16 & art. 15).

  3. Event triggering the compulsory tender offer: threshold, extensions, exemptions. • 30 percent as triggering threshold: but underlines control; • Extensions: acquisition of an empty shell whose most important asset is 30% of a listed corporation; tender offer for acquisition of 3% in between 30 and 50%; • Exemptions: art. 5, § 2 of the directive, voluntary bid on all the “securities”; other exemptions (temporary acquisitions, acquisitions for turn-around, involuntary acquisitions…).

  4. The price of the compulsory tender offer. • Art. 106 of TUF: average of the market price and highest price paid in the last 12 months; • Art. 5, § 4 of the Directive: highest price paid in the last 6-12 months; • The problem of “hidden” prices: e.g. when a bidder buys a non-listed corporation controlling a listed one, which represents its major asset, and the consideration for the purchase is neither cash nor securities, but the obligation to pay the debts of the non-listed corporation.

  5. Action in concert. • Art. 2, § 1 (d) of the Directive: the “goal” of the agreement is relevant; • Art. 109 of TUF: objectively identifies specific relationships (shareholders’ agreements, groups of companies, directors and chief executives) that represent a irrefutable presumption of action in concert.

  6. Passivity rule. • Art. 9 of the Directive similar to art. 104 of TUF, but: • Period in which the issuer is subject to the passivity rule: even before full disclosure? • Vote in the shareholders’ meeting: • Supermajority (same threshold that triggers the compulsory bid); • “Majority of the minority”: exclusion of the controlling shareholder and of the bidder; • Article 11 directive: opt-out (or reciprocity).

  7. Breakthrough rule. • Only for compulsory bids, or also for voluntary bids (at least if extended to all the outstanding shares)? • Possibility to opt-in, with the exception of the existing rule on shareholders’ agreements.

  8. marco.ventoruzzo@unibocconi.it

More Related