240 likes | 419 Views
The Swedish Implementation of the Takeover Directive. Rolf Skog 2006. Sweden – Takeover Activity. 1960 – 1990 1960s: 29 takeover bids 1970s: 38 takeover bids 1980s: 137 takeover bids First ”hostile” bid 1979 Approx 10% ”hostile bids” during the 1980s. Sweden – Takeover Activity.
E N D
The Swedish Implementation of the Takeover Directive Rolf Skog 2006 Rolf Skog
Sweden – Takeover Activity 1960 – 1990 • 1960s: 29 takeover bids • 1970s: 38 takeover bids • 1980s: 137 takeover bids • First ”hostile” bid 1979 • Approx 10% ”hostile bids” during the 1980s Rolf Skog
Sweden – Takeover Activity 1990 – 2004 • 358 Takeover bids • 293 Completed bids; 20 bids/year, 7% • Almost all bids voluntary, very few mandatory bids • Approx 10% ”hostile” bids • In 25 % a foreign bidder, increasing proportion Rolf Skog
Sweden – Takeover Activity 2005 • 15 Takeover bids • 10 Successful bids • 5 Unsuccessful bids (3 mandatory/2 voluntary) • 1 Large, ”hostile” bid: Old Mutual – Skandia • In 2/3 of the 15 bids a foreign bidder • (3 Mergers) Rolf Skog
Sweden – The Takeover Regulation • Public debate on takeovers in the late 1960´s • Takeover Code 1971 (UK role model) • Several revisions over the years, latest issue 2003 • Takeover Code included in the Stockholm Stock Exchange Listing Agreement (sanctions) • Securities Council (”Takeover Panel”) 1986 Rolf Skog
Sweden – The Takeover Code • All bidders, all companies listed in Sweden • ”Cash confirmation” • Press release, Offer document • Equal treatment of shareholders • Pre-, During-, Post-bid acquisitions • Board neutrality unless shareholder approval • Mandatory bid, 30 % • Squeeze out / Sell out (CA) Rolf Skog
Sweden – The Securities Council • Statements (written) and dispensation • Consultations • Approx 350 statements; majority on TO • In 2005 more than 50 statements • Speedy process; many statements within 24 h • No sanctions, except public censure • Sanctions by the Stock Exchange for listed bidders and targets Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive • The Committee on Takeovers, set up by the Ministry of Justice in 2004 • Task: to put forward a proposal on form and substance • Report in June 2005 (”New Regulation of Public Takover-bids”) • Public consultation • Bill to Parliament April 2006 – Decision May 2006 Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Form Basic alternatives: • 1) Legislation • 2) Legislation and regulation by delegation • 3) Legislation, regulation by delegation and self-regulation Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Form - The ”success” of the self-regulatory system - Strong wish among market participants to keep as much as possible intact, especially the Securities Council. Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Form The Swedish Constitution No delegation of legislative power from the Parliament to the Government within the private law area (personal status of private subjects or their personal and economic interrelationships) Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Form • Combination of legislation and self-regulation • All marketplaces must, by law, have rules on takeovers • All bidders must, by law, agree to follow the takeover rules • Mandatory bid by law Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Competent Authority The Financial Supervisory Authority, with power to: • Monitor the marketplaces • Monitor bidders • Monitor mandatory bids • Dispensate from the mandatory bid and prohibition on defensive measures (delegation possible) Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Marketplaces • Must have rules on takeovers • Monitor bids (bidders, targets, advisors) • Interpret and dispensate from the rules (delegation possible) Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Securities Council • Continue on the basis of delegation from • Financial Supervisory Authority • Marketplaces • Interpretation • Dispensation Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance • Art 1 Scope of application – All bids on Swedish companies and foreign companies listed in Sweden • Art 2 Definitions – minor adjustments • Art 3 General principals – implement strictly Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance • Art 4 Supervisory authority and applicable law – Financial Supervisory Authority • Art 5 Protection of minority shareholders – Mandatory bid, 30 % votes, bidprice not less than highest price paid within 6 months Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance • Art 6 Information concerning bids – Pressrelease and offer document, minor adjustments • Art 7 Time allowed for acceptance – 3–10 weeks • Art 8 Disclosure – No amendments Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance • Art 9 Obligations of the target company board – Opt in, already in existence • Art 10 Information on ”control mechanisms” – Amendments to the Annual Accounts Act Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance • Art 11 Break through– Opt out, but amendments to the Sw Companies Act Compensation by the bidder to be decided by the GM • Art 12 Reciprocity - No Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance • Art 13 Other rules – No amendments • Art 14 Information to and consultation of employees – Amendments Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance • Art 15 Squeeze-out – No amendments • Art 16 Sell-out) – No amendments Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance Art 17 Sanctions – Mix of - Prohibition of bid, - Loss of voting rights, - Fine. Rolf Skog
Sweden – Implementation of the Directive Substance Art 21 Transposition – July 1, 2006 Rolf Skog