1 / 7

WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION

WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION. Continued Application of 5 LPNCs even on TERMINAL PROCEDURESMostly NPAs ( VOR/DME, LORAN, FMS, GPS-OVERLAY, RNAV-GPS )Few DEPARTURE TRIAL PROCEDURESSTATUS : CNFs- NOT ATC- Relevant. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION. INTRODUCTION of NAVDB-SYSTEMsARINC 424- SPECIFICATIONP

kevina
Download Presentation

WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION ICAO STATE LETTER 1978 INTRODUCTION 5 LPNC-CONCEPT DIFFERENTIATION NAV AIDs vs SIGNIFICANT POINTs DIFFERENTIATION ENROUTE vs TERMINAL RULE : 5 LPNC NOT TMA

    2. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION Continued Application of 5 LPNCs even on TERMINAL PROCEDURES Mostly NPAs ( VOR/DME, LORAN, FMS, GPS-OVERLAY, RNAV-GPS ) Few DEPARTURE TRIAL PROCEDURES STATUS : CNFs- NOT ATC- Relevant

    3. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION INTRODUCTION of NAVDB-SYSTEMs ARINC 424- SPECIFICATION PROCEDURAL POINTS NOT NAMED COMPUTER LANGUAGE DEVELOPED ( D 067Q, CF 062 FF 142 , f. e. ) NOT TRANSPARENT to FLIGHT CREWs or AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL

    4. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION DIFFERENCE CNF vs TACTICAL WPT DIFFERENCE RV vs TACTICAL WPT NEED for UNAMBIGIOUS DESIGNATION 5 LPNC = NO PRACTICAL SOLUTION

    5. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION

    6. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION ALPHANUMERIC IDENTIFICATION of WPTs BUILDING RULE = LL NNN CLEARANCE vs FLIGHT CREW- ACTION ALL TMA- WAYPOINTs NAMED AND CHARTED CHART vs ND vs CDU = SAME

    7. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION International Agreement NOT necessary NO Duplicates SIMILAR to RADAR VECTORING Hear Back / Read Back IDENTICAL SIMPLE, EASY to HANDLE , even under HIGH WORKLOAD HIGHEST LEVEL of STANDARDIZATION

More Related