1 / 13

New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum NJQSAC

New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum NJQSAC. The Somerset Hills School District November 18, 2009. What Is QSAC?. NJDOE’s new monitoring/evaluation system, occurs every three years Integrates NJ Administrative Code, Statutes, Federal mandates

kezia
Download Presentation

New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum NJQSAC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Jersey Quality Single Accountability ContinuumNJQSAC The Somerset Hills School District November 18, 2009

  2. What Is QSAC? • NJDOE’s new monitoring/evaluation system, occurs every three years • Integrates NJ Administrative Code, Statutes, Federal mandates • Focuses on five components as key factors in effective school districts • Applies to all public school districts in New Jersey • Our district review spans 2006-2009

  3. Process • Administrators reviewed DPRs at Administrative Council meetings (2008-2009) • Central Office Administrators attended training sessions (2008-2009) • District conducted facility walkthroughs (July – August 2009) • Facilities inspection by Executive County Superintendent (ECS) and staff (September 2009) • Self-Assessment Committee meet in October and early November 2009) • Board of Education approves DPRs (November 18, 2009) • Submission of DPR self-assessment to ECS (November 2009) • Desk audit of data by ECS (November and December 2009) • In-district examination of DPR evidence by ECS and staff (January 25 & 26, 2010) • ECS submits scored DPRs to Commissioner (February 2010) • Commissioner determines district’s status and provides written notification (April 2010)

  4. Self-Assessment Committee • Superintendent formed district committee • District Performance Reviews (DPR) = checklist to score each of five components • Committee reviewed approximately 10 hours of evidence • Additional evidence requested • Scores were totaled, must prove all clustered indicators - - no partial points

  5. Required Committee Membership • Chief School Administrator • District Administrator • Teacher • Business Administrator • Curriculum Representative • Local Collective Bargaining Unit Representative • District Board of Education Member

  6. Committee Membership • Pete Miller, Superintendent • Barbara Walls, Assistant Superintendent • Nancy Hunter, Business Administrator • Debra Wilkins, Director of Curriculum & Instruction • Vincent D’Elia, Director of Special Services • Judi Martin, Teacher, Association Representative • Deborah Rokosky, Teacher • Robert Baker, Board of Education Member

  7. DPR Five Key Components • Fiscal Management • Governance • Instruction and Program • Operations • Personnel

  8. Fiscal Management – Self-Assessment Score: 99 of 100 points • Financial planning (policies, curriculum plans, textbook replacement, maintenance plans, budget calendar/objectives) • Budget (detailed documentation, position control, trend analysis of historical expenditures, vendor quotes, transfer reports, audit, monthly reports, work orders, fixed assets) • Internal controls (separation of duties, check-signing, cash receipts, purchase orders) • Public school contract law (quote/bid thresholds, emergency provisions) • Audit (findings, material weaknesses, fund deficits, over-expenditures) • Federal grants (maintenance of effort, manages non-public allocations, carryover reports) • NCLB (grant applications/expenditures/reports/accounting) • Capital projects (accounting, files, change orders, voter approval) • Shared services (Alliance for Competitive Energy Services, transportation jointures, municipal agreements, purchasing co-ops, sending/receiving) • State indicators (class size, overtime payment, below median admin. spending, health plan quotes, distance learning, reduce out-of-district placements, no late payments)

  9. Governance – Self-Assessment Score: 100 of 100 points • NJCCCS at all grades (mission statement, testing results, NJ Report Card, State approved curriculum) • Board requirements (by-laws, policies, training, State regulations, disclosure statements, School Ethics Act, recusals, nepotism) • Board conduct (Open Public Meetings Act, meeting notice, public minutes, confine actions to policy/planning/appraisal, understand employment contracts, refer complaints) • Board evaluates Superintendent annually (policy, form, goals, contract) • Superintendent’s calendar system (personnel appointment, transfers, non-renewals) • Budget (addresses student performance, timely submission, public hearing, account transfers, contracts, reports, audit) • Board communication (policies, OPRA, confidentiality, website)

  10. Instruction and Program – Self-Assessment Score: current points 72 of 118 points* anticipated points 115 of 118 points • Adequate Yearly Progress (math/language arts all subgroups, annual progress or 95% proficiency) • Student achievement (annual analysis within district, state, DFG all subgroups) • Curriculum and Strategies (Art, Health, Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies, World Language Technology, Career Ed. aligned w/NJCCCS, professional development, identify problem areas, multiple assessments to show alignment, performance assessments, teacher-designed lesson plans, diversity) • Articulation (district/school/department meetings) • Classroom supervision (improve instruction, curriculum delivery, teacher evaluations) • Lesson plans (based on analysis of student work, supervisory review & feedback) • Teachers collaboratively meet various learning styles (district/school/dept./grade level meetings • Students/parents feedback (conferences, website, testing report) • Students with disabilities and English language difficulties (curriculum, assessment data, modifications, sample IEPs, strategies, proficiency standards) • Technology (integration, training, progress) • Mandated programs (Special education, English proficiency, enrichment) • High School Graduation (rate, Special Review Assessment (SRA) %, vocational, alternative programs, state graduation requirements) * NJDOE has not provided data for indicators A1-6. Districts have been instructed by NJDOE to leave those indicators blank.  Although this reduces the district’s self-assessment score in this section to 61%, it is the district’s expectation that all of the points for A1-6 will be awarded when the NJDOE provides that information. 

  11. Operations - Self-Assessment Score: 120 out of 120 points • Long Range Facilities Plan (maintenance, budget) • Annual safety reviews (facilities, eyewashes, equipment) • NJ SMART (NJDOE student data system) • Emergency management (preparation, response, recovery) • Violence & Vandalism (behavior, corrective action) • Code of Student Conduct (state code compliance) • Attendance (unexcused absence, missing children, DYFS) • Bullying (procedures, training, guidance) • Memorandum of Agreement (Prosecutor’s Office, police) • Transportation (routes, safety drills, bus incidents) • Nursing Plan (medical records, exams, immunizations) • Comprehensive Equity Plan (training, goals, progress) • Guidance (support services, counseling, transition, career ed.) • Intervention and Referral Services (learning, behavior or health problems) • Substance abuse (assessment, intervention, evaluation, treatment) • Home instruction (illness, suspension)

  12. Personnel – Self-Assessment Score: 100 of 100 points • Hiring (certification, criminal history check, job descriptions) • Recruitment and Retention (analysis, recruit/retain plan) • Highly Qualified Status (certification vs. assignment) • Staff evaluation (training, documentation) • Affirmative Action (training, reports) • Employee Health (physical exams, history) • Training (child abuse, suicide, PL 504, equity, bullying, sexual harassment, substance abuse, crisis management) • Professional Development (based on student needs, data-driven practices, meet NJCCCS, subgroup performance, Professional Development Plan, Mentoring Plan) • Professional Growth Plan (for all administrators) and Professional Development Plan (for all certificated staff)

  13. Tonight’s motion will indicate -- • The Somerset Hills School District Board of Education approves the District Performance Reviews as verified by the NJQSAC Self-Assessment Committee and authorizes their submission along with the Superintendent’s Statement of Assurance to the Somerset Executive County Superintendent.

More Related