1 / 9

Progress of Vietnam’s Global Child Poverty Study

Progress of Vietnam’s Global Child Poverty Study. Vietnam Country Study Team. Oct – Nov ’07: Drafted TORs , identified potential partners (SEDEC, GSO);

kiele
Download Presentation

Progress of Vietnam’s Global Child Poverty Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Progress of Vietnam’s Global Child Poverty Study Vietnam Country Study Team

  2. Oct – Nov ’07: Drafted TORs , identified potential partners (SEDEC, GSO); • Dec ’07-Jan ’08: Set up a Country study team; Policy and Statistics team, reference group with TORs; Agreement with all parties (MOLISA, GSO, SEDEC) on coordination and working mechanism • February ‘08: detail work plan • of each team; detail policy • analysis and statistical analysis • Frameworks. Progress

  3. March 14, 2008: Orientation Workshop with all govermental-line agencies and key stakeholders, which reached to: • Common understanding the concept of the study, approaches and methodologies. • Consensus on the national • policies and programs that • most affect child well-being. • Plan and coordination • between teams. Progress

  4. UNICEF HQ (Guidance, Supervision) IPI Data Compilation UNICEF Vietnam(Country focal point/HQ liaison) MOLISA(Coordination, leadership) GSO (Statistical templates) Country team(Country analysis report) SEDEC (Policy templates) MOF MOET MOH MPI MOJ MOLISA MARD MOCST CEM Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) Policy expert (Focal points) ORGANISATION

  5. Progress • April – May ‘08:Data (policy and statistics) gathering and processing, Regional workshop. • June ’08: Report writing and Consultations with various stakeholders • July ’08: Finalization

  6. Progress 12 May ’08: Data gathering + Preparation of Statistic and Policy frameworks + Prelimilary draft Chapter 1: Children and development 2 of 3 paragraphs draftted Chapter 2: Poverty and children Data + 1 of 3 paragraphs draftted Chapter 3: The pillars of child well-being Data + 2 of 5 paragraphs draftted Chapter 4: A strategy for child well-being and equity 0 of 2 paragraphs draftted

  7. Pros vs. Con Favourable circumstances: • Rich national data sets • VLSS 1993, 1998, 2002, 2004, 2006 (some data) • MICS II (2001), MICS III (2006); • Population census 1999, pop. survey 2006 • National health survey 2003 & other surveys • Some existing studies on children, poverty. • High goverment’s commitment, cooperation of experts of ministries.

  8. Pros vs. Con Difficulties: • The guideline seems too ambitious (data, correlation analysis) with a given limited time. • Unsuitable timing: • UNICEF: MTR process, Child poverty index at the same time • Counterparts: over committed/overload with govt.’s agenda e.g. VHLSS’08 • Data: • Availability e.g. no data of many indicators (budget data for children, disaggregated level) • Quality / accuracy / compatibility (diff. definition/calculation, unreliable adm. data) • Accessibility (data from various sources) • Data on children aged 16 (Vietnam) vs. aged 18 (CRC)

  9. Thank you

More Related