1 / 20

Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer – which target dominates the phenotype 20 th Annual NOCR meeting

Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer – which target dominates the phenotype 20 th Annual NOCR meeting Las Vegas, February 28 th 2014. Ruth M. O’Regan, MD Professor and Vice-Chair for Educational Affairs, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University,

kiet
Download Presentation

Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer – which target dominates the phenotype 20 th Annual NOCR meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer – which target dominates the phenotype20th Annual NOCR meetingLas Vegas, February 28th 2014 Ruth M. O’Regan, MD Professor and Vice-Chair for Educational Affairs, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Chief of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital

  2. HER2-positive breast cancers are intrinsically resistant to endocrine therapy • Transfection of ER-positive breast cancer cells with HER2 renders them resistant to tamoxifen • Retrospective analyses of trials in the ER-positive metastatic setting show a worse outcome for cancers that co-express HER2, compared to those that do not • Median progression free survival is less than 6 months for ER+ HER2+ MBC treated with aromatase inhibitors Benz BRCT BRCT 1992, De Laurentiis J Clin Oncol 2005, Kaufman J Clin Oncol 2009, Johnston J Clin Oncol 2009

  3. Outcome for patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer based on HER2 status HER2- HER2+/- Progression free survival(months) ANAST ANAST LET LET LET Kaufman J Clin Oncol 2009, Johnston J Clin Oncol 2009, Bonneterre Cancer 2001, Moridisen J Clin Oncol 2003, Nahta BRCT 2012

  4. HER2 trumps ER when both receptors are expressed….. But is this true for all HR+ HER+ breast cancers?

  5. Pathologic complete response is consistently lower in ER+ HER2+ breast cancers compared to ER- HER2+ breast cancers Percent PCR T/P T L T/L T L T/L T L T/L T L T P T/P T/L D P P -> FEC FEC -> P EC -> D Reviewed in Nahta and O’Regan BRCT 2012

  6. PCR is prognostic in ER- cancer but not ER+ cancers that co-express HER2 ER-negative, HER2-positive ER-positive, HER2-positive von Mitchwitz et al SABCS 2011

  7. Other evidence supporting a role for ER in HER2+ cancers • In the adjuvant trastuzumab trials, DFS is longer for ER+ cancers compared to ER- cancers (at least up to 4-5 years) • A subset of patients with ER-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer have prolonged disease control with ER-inhibition alone without HER2-inhibition • Patterns of recurrence differ (ER+ more common in bone) Perez J Clin Oncol 2011, Kaufman J Clin Oncol 2009

  8. Why is this important? • We may (and probably are) over-treating a subgroup of ER+, HER2+ breast cancers in the (neo)-adjuvant setting • This subgroup of patients with ER+, HER2+ breast cancers may suffer late recurrences (similar to what we see with luminal A cancers) • Can we identify this subgroup that is driven by ER?

  9. Likelihood of PCR is inversely related to level of ER expression for HER2+ breast cancers ER expression HER2+/HR- HER2+/ER+ Percent PCR HER2+/ER+++ Bhargava Mod Path 2011, Nahta BRCT 2012

  10. C40601: HER2+ Subtypes by Hormone Receptor (HR) HR-negative HR-positive Normal-like 7% Normal-like 10% Basal-like 15% Lum B 6% HER2-E 18% Lum B 34% Lum A 16% HER2-E 52% Lum A 43% Carey et al Proc ASCO 2013

  11. Prognostic ability of 70-gene signature in HER2+, ER+ cancers: untreated patients (n = 89) 21-gene signature not useful as HER2+ cancers have intermediate or high recurrence scores Knauer et al BJC 2010

  12. Bi-directional cross-talk between ER and HER2 • Signaling through EGFR family including HER2 down-regulates ER • Conversely, inhibition of HER2 with trastuzumab or lapatinib increases signaling through ER • ER signaling is increased in HER2-positive cell lines that are resistant to HER2-directed agents • HER2 expression and activity is increased in hormone-resistant cancers, compared to hormone-sensitive cancers Pinzone Mol Cell Biol 2004, Stoia J Endocrinol 2000, Sabnis Cancer Res 2009, Xia PNAS 2006, Valabrega Oncogene 2005

  13. HER2 signaling decreases ER activation and inhibition of HER2 increases ER-regulated gene transcription TRAST HER1/2/3 HER2 HER2 HER1/2/3 PI3-K PI3-K x x Membrane Membrane TKI Ras Ras AKT AKT FOXO3a FOXO3a FOXO3a MEK MEK ER ER Erk1/2 Erk1/2 Cytoplasm Cytoplasm x ER-regulated gene transcription ER-regulated gene transcription ER ER Nucleus Nucleus ERE ERE Xia PNAS 2006, Valabrega Oncogene 2005

  14. Clinical relevance of this cross-talk • Inhibition of HER2 without inhibition of ER may increase ER signaling allowing ER to act as an escape mechanism • This could contribute to the lower PCR seen in ER+ HER2+ breast cancers and have potential implications in the metastatic setting • There may be a subset of ER+ HER2+ breast cancers where ER inhibition is critical (more important than chemotherapy)

  15. Excellent outcomes for small ER+ HER2+ cancers treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy Tolaney SABCS 2013

  16. Response to pre-operative trastuzumab and lapatinib ± letrozole (12 weeks) pCR + npCR pCR 70 60 * 50 48% 56% 53% 40 pCR (%) 40% 30 28% 20 21% 10 0 All ER+ ER- All ER+ ER - * NeoSphere: PCR 6% with dual HER2 inhibition without ER inhibition Rimawi CCR 2013 npCR = < 1cm residual cancer in the breast

  17. TEL trial: Pre-operative Trastuzumab, everolimus and letrozole in HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer (PI O’Regan) HER2 + ER+ breast cancer Stratify: ER/PR > 50% ER±PR < 50% Trastuzumab Letrozole (± LHRH agonist) Everolimus 12 weeks* Primary endpoint: PCR *Adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy at physicians discretion

  18. Case history • 46-year old with recent diagnosis of stage 1A (T1B (8mm), N0), grade 2, ER 90%, PR 90%, HER2+ (FISH+) cancer status post bilateral mastectomies • Wants to avoid chemotherapy • 70-gene signature: good prognosis • Opts not to receive chemotherapy • Receiving trastuzumab and tamoxifen

  19. Conclusions • Although HER2 signaling is associated with intrinsic resistance to endocrine agents, a subset of HER2+, ER+ cancers appear to be driven, at least in part, by ER • Identification of these cancers is crucial: • They may require less aggressive treatment approaches with earlier institution of ER inhibition • May behave like ER+ HER2- cancers with late relapses • Molecular profiling should be looked at in more depth in these cancers

More Related