1 / 31

ILC full simulator status CAL/MUD

ILC full simulator status CAL/MUD. ILCCAL meeting 2006/02/28 Hiroaki Ono Niigata University with Acfa-sim-j members. Default Geometry in Full Simulator. Octagonal shape (8gon) 5 Layers of MUD Iron. VTX. SOL. TPC. CAL. MUD. Latest Design in DOD draft. Front active layer at MUD.

kieu
Download Presentation

ILC full simulator status CAL/MUD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ILC full simulator statusCAL/MUD ILCCAL meeting 2006/02/28 Hiroaki Ono Niigata University with Acfa-sim-j members ILC Full Simulator Status

  2. Default Geometry in Full Simulator • Octagonal shape (8gon) • 5 Layers of MUD Iron VTX SOL TPC CAL MUD ILC Full Simulator Status

  3. Latest Design in DOD draft Front active layer at MUD Octagonal Shape 425cm 800cm Number of Layers are 9 ILC Full Simulator Status

  4. Latest Geometry in Full Simulator • Dodecagonal shape (12gon) • Front Active layer at MUD • 9 Layers MUD iron • FCAL was installed VTX SOL TPC This is not yet upload to CVS. Coming soon. CAL MUD ILC Full Simulator Status

  5. Latest Geometry Cut View • Dodecagonal shape (12gon) of Muon Detector • 9 Layers of Absorber at Muon Detector • Front Active Layer as Default r-f cut view Z cut view ILC Full Simulator Status

  6. Detailed design inDOD Design and Full Simulator Geometry 485cm 765cm 800cm 425cm 800cm 425cm ILC Full Simulator Status http://www.hep.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp/~ono/ilc/Jupiter/

  7. Muon/Calorimeter Analysis Part ILC Full Simulator Status

  8. Muon Finding Efficiency Muon injected to the cosq = 0 (barrel direction) 1000 events in each momentum. Red : First Layer only Black : All Layer 6GeV: Efficiency>99% ILC Full Simulator Status

  9. Multiple Scattering Effect (First Layer) Muon injected to the cosq=0 direction Muon momentum 5, 10, 20, 50 GeV sz = 1.3 cm @50GeV at the First Layer. ILC Full Simulator Status

  10. Multiple Scattering Effect (Last layer) Muon injected to the cosq=0 direction. Muon momentum 5, 10, 20, 50 GeV sz = 2.2 cm @50GeV at the Last Layer. ILC Full Simulator Status

  11. Why is it worse compare to previous Acfa Report? This simulation looks observing at Muon Detector front surface, Not First Layer ? Muon first layer located After 5cm Iron plate in current setup. 5.6l0 HD6.1l0 +SOL ILC Full Simulator Status

  12. Momentum dependence of sz Smaller than 1cm will be reached. ILC Full Simulator Status

  13. e+e-bb √s = 500GeV Muon Momentum from Jets Muon momentum measured at muon detector surface. ILC Full Simulator Status

  14. Energy Leakage from Calorimeter Total leakage energy measured at muon detector surface in each events (~10k event), Including neutral, n ILC Full Simulator Status

  15. Leakage energy analysis Cluster Energy = Energy sum of calorimeter with calibration. Z  uds (ECM = 91.18 GeV) 7500 events. Total energy measured by Calorimeter only. Calibration value does not yet optimized... s/m = 6.09 % s/m x√91.18 = 55.5 % [GeV] ILC Full Simulator Status

  16. Leakage energy measured at CAL outer Z  uds (ECM = 91.18 GeV) 7500 events. MUD Front surface CAL Outer Surface [GeV] Why is it large at MUD front surface? [GeV] ILC Full Simulator Status

  17. Sum of Cluster Energy and CALPost Z  uds (ECM = 91.187 GeV) 7500 events. s/m = 5.65 % s/m x√91.18 = 51.5 % Mean greater than 92 GeV  Calibration does not optimized. [GeV] ILC Full Simulator Status

  18. Total Energy at CAL Front Surface+ MUD Front Surface Z  uds (ECM = 91.187 GeV) 7500 events. s/m = 4.58% s/m x√91.18 = 43.7 % [GeV] Many tracks does not reached 92 GeV ILC Full Simulator Status

  19. Complete Leakage Analysis Mass resolution Hybrid Track : Charged Neutral : CAL+Leak Contribution of the mass resolution from Leak Energy Additional structure to combine MUDHit to CALPreHit ILC Full Simulator Status

  20. Another Contents ILC Full Simulator Status

  21. New CAL geometry CLX New Calorimeter geometry CLX was prepared by Kawakami-san (Shinshu-U) • Octagonal shape, not tower structure • Jupiter part construction might be finished. • Miyamoto-san prepared to switch CAL/CLX at Jupiter/Satellites, also prepared to put Exact hit data from Jupiter to CALExactHit (Not create CLXExactHit ). • Sevral parts in Satellites should be prepared to use CLX analysis. ILC Full Simulator Status

  22. CLX and CAL(from Miyamoto-san’s report) • New Directory CLXwas created in Jupiter. • CAL/CLX exclusive selected by switch in Jupiter.cc • Address part is not consistent with CAL but others are similar. • Satellites ExactHit was shared with CAL/CLX. • Not finished to create Satellites part ILC Full Simulator Status

  23. Next Issues • CAL/CLX and MUD should have a method of “Merge cell” or “merge hit” to create strip detector analysis at Satellites. • Link with hybrid track to CAL/MUD hits to study real PFA. • MUD analysis part (Muon Finding) should be prepared. • CAL calibration factor should be update for the newest version of Geant4 (K.Fujii-san pointed out : geant4.8.0.p01) ILC Full Simulator Status

  24. Flow of CAL Analysis Jupiter Outputs are put into the Satellites Exact Hits. J4XXHit  S4XXExactHit Jupiter Hit J4CALHit Jupiter Satellites Satellites Exact Hit S4CALExactHit io Hits merged to be a strip hit Merged Hit S4CALHit metis Clustering S4CALCluster JSF ILC Full Simulator Status

  25. Advantage of this structure Geant geometry is so complicated  Only plate of CAL, no Cell Jupiter Geometry reconstruct at Satellites part. If ( -0.5<x<0.5) hit0 = exacthit Satellites Geometry information io Hits merged to be a strip hit metis JSF Real Clustering ILC Full Simulator Status

  26. Satellites for CLX • jsfj4 : “HasCAL/HasCLX” flag to include/not include CLX/CAL How to process CLXHit ? Flow of CALHit making J4CALHit J4CLXHit S4CALExactHit S4CLXExactHit ? S4CALAddress? S4CALHit S4CLXHit ? MergeHit ? S4CALCluster S4CLXCluster ? ILC Full Simulator Status

  27. Leakage energy analysis Z  qqbar 500 event (ECM = 91.187 GeV) Energy sum of calorimeter with calibration. Mean : 85.68 GeV Total energy measured by Calorimeter only. Calibration value does not yet optimized... [GeV] ILC Full Simulator Status

  28. Leakage energy study Z  qqbar 500 event (ECM = 91.187 GeV) Events Total leakage energy measured at the CAL outer position. (Inside of the solenoid) Mean = 3.3 GeV [GeV] ILC Full Simulator Status

  29. Leakage energy correction in CAL After correction Cluster Energy + CAL Post Total Energy at CAL outer Surface [GeV] ILC Full Simulator Status

  30. Exact hit information at CAL front Z  qqbar (ECM = 91.187 GeV) Exact hit total energy measured at CAL front position. Energy did not reached at the Calorimeter, we missed. Thus energy is smaller than 91.2GeV If we use the tracking information too, energy resolution should be improved.  PFA analysis [GeV] Mean : 83 GeV ILC Full Simulator Status

  31. Muon Detector Analysis for DOD cosq=0 • Single muon momentum scan • Efficiency • sz distribution • Jets event • e+e-bbbar (500GeV) • e+e-qqbar (300GeV) • e+e-  uds (91GeV) ILC Full Simulator Status

More Related