1 / 14

PDI Session - IT Directions at CSU

PDI Session - IT Directions at CSU. Pat Burns, VP for IT 11:00 – 11:50 AM January 7, 2010. Outline. Administrative Computing Academic Computing Networking Communications Technologies L earning Management S ystems Other Instructional Technologies A ccess to Central D ata Q&A.

kieu
Download Presentation

PDI Session - IT Directions at CSU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PDI Session - IT Directions at CSU Pat Burns, VP for IT 11:00 – 11:50 AM January 7, 2010

  2. Outline • Administrative Computing • Academic Computing • Networking • Communications Technologies • Learning Management Systems • Other Instructional Technologies • Access to Central Data • Q&A

  3. Administrative Computing • Kuali Financial System • Implemented July 1, 2009 • Will be in ‘sweep up’ mode for awhile • ‘Community Source’ saved $millions • Kuali Coeus research management system • In development • Will implement module by module staring Fall 10 • Banner Document Management System (BDMS) • Project for Spring 10: imaging, organization, work flow

  4. Academic Computing • Academic Computing and Networking Services • Proposed transition to CSU Libraries to deal with the ‘tsunami’ of data impinging upon us • Present focus on efficiencies and robustness • Federated identity management – shibboleth (shib) deployed • Need an Identity and Access Management system • NSF funded ISTeC HPC system – RFP ‘on the street’ • NSF proposal for a digital repository for research data submitted in August

  5. Networking • Have adequate Internet capacity at the FRGP • Commodity and R&E networks • Need additional WAN capacity (in process) • Capacity upgrades needed in the LAN • Three-tier model: central, building, edge (user) • A six year refresh cycle • Proposed a new cost recovery model based upon FTE to permit capacity upgrades • Have ceased rescanning for SSNs and CCNs • Wireless upgrades in progress

  6. Communications Technologies • Next generation includes • Transport over the ‘internet’ • Telephone (softphone clients very attractive) • Unified messaging • Federated (agnostic) instant messaging • Multipoint conferencing: audio, video, web • Collaboration • Email/calendar • Mobility • Presence • Exploring Community Source SIPXecs & OCS

  7. Learning Management Systems • Our most visible, used system (~7k sim. users) • A significant struggle with BlackBoard CE6 • Very poor support from the vendor • Expensive • Difficult and staff intensive to operate • 1-page support documents developed (H1N1…) • Forced transition in 2011 – a big change • Exploring BB CE 9 & Community Source sakai • FCCT&L engaged in the discussion

  8. Last 2 Weeks of Fall 2009

  9. Architecture Front end (13 total nodes) Web & Application Server Web & Applicion Server Web & Application Server Back end . . . Load Balancer Oracle Database Server Internet Load Balancer Web & Application Server Users Learning Object Database Courses, workshops, seminars

  10. Other Instructional Technologies • In 146 GA classrooms • UTFAB (student) funded • 5-yr. refresh for computer projection – no upgrades for document cameras • 126 of 148 done (85%) by end of FY 2010 • Adding 7-12 rooms per year (3 more years…) • Now installing HD systems • Higher resolution (to match current video cards) • 16x9 format, some ‘split screen’ • Now know how to configure large classrooms • Johnson Hall, AIB, …

  11. Access to Central Data • New managed, decentralized access to central data • Approved by the ITEC Dec. 8, 2009 • ‘People’ classifications • Data Authority (for each System of Record) • Data Stewards (in colleges/ divisions) • Data Users • Data classifications • Protected data – ‘business’ data • Restricted data – ‘sensitive’ data • Private data – SSNs, CCNs, personnel records, etc.

  12. Flow Diagram Data Systems of Record (SORs) Data Authorities - DAs Data Stewards - DSs Data Users - DUs Data Store FAMIS Research Admiss. Advance CSUF KFS Aries HR • Protected • Restricted • Private F E E D S DAs DSs DUs ODS & eThority

  13. Data Access Model • Direct access • ODBC calls (e.g. MS Access) • Web access • Oracle Discoverer • Business intelligence • eThority (CVMBS) • Proposal to the Executive Committee of cabinet to fund the increments for a site license

  14. Q&A • At your convenience

More Related