140 likes | 308 Views
First Experience with KENDA at MeteoSwiss. Daniel Leuenberger, MeteoSwiss a big thanks to Hendrik Reich, Andreas Rhodin and Harald Anlauf ( DWD). Project COSMO-NExT. Boundary conditions : IFS 10km 4x daily. Boundary conditions : VarEPS 20km 2x daily.
E N D
First Experience with KENDA atMeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger, MeteoSwiss a bigthanks toHendrik Reich, Andreas Rhodinand Harald Anlauf (DWD)
Project COSMO-NExT Boundaryconditions: IFS10km4x daily Boundaryconditions: VarEPS20km2x daily ensembledataassimilation: LETKF COSMO-E: 2x daily 5 dayforecasts2.2km gridsize (convectionpermitting) O(21) ensemblemembers COSMO-1: 8x daily O(24 hour) forecasts1.1km gridsize (convectionpermitting)
First real casestudy • LETKF integrated in MeteoSwiss NWP suite • Assessthequalityofthedeterministicanalysisandcomparewith a nudgingexperimentand a freeforecast (work in progress) • Summer 2012 period 25.7.-31.7.2012 (7 days) withmoderate convectiveactivityand a cold front passage
Experimental setup I • Operational COSMO-2 setup • 1h update cycles • LETKF • 40 members + deterministicanalysis (LETKF_DET) • DWD namelistadaptedto COSMO-2 • Constant covarianceinflation (error in oursetup) • LETKF_SPPT • Same asLETKF, but withuseof SPPT duringforecaststep • NUDGING • As operational COSMO-2 analysis but without LHN andwithoutassimilationof TD_2M • NO_OBS • Same as NUDGING, but noassimilationofobservations
Experimental setup II • Identicalsetofobservations(cdfinfiles) forall experimentsTEMP, AMDAR, SYNOP,WINDPROF • LBC from operational ECMWF EPS (first 40 members) forLETKFandECMWF deterministicforecastforLETKF_DET, NUDGINGandNO_OBS • Idential IC atstartofperiodforLETKF_DET, NUDGINGandNO_OBSfrom COSMO-2 opranalysisof 25.7.2012 00UTC • Initial ensemblefor LETKF atstartofperioddownscaledfrom ECMWF EPS. Soilfieldsfrom COSMO-2 opranalysisfor all members • COSMO 4.26 and LETKF 1.26 from 27.6.2013
Comparisonwithsurfaceobs Meandailycycleoverca 450 stations and 7 days T_2M FF_10M Ps TD_2M
Comparisonwithsurfaceobs Temporal evolutionof RMSE, meanoverca 450 stations T_2M FF_10M TD_2M Ps
Analysis time evolution • Domain average, lower 3000m • Generally similarevolutionof all experiments (weare in a LAM!) • LETKF ensemblemeangenerallyverysimilarto LETKF det (thisisgoodnews!) • Influenceof SPPT not really large • EXCEPT… • All aboveis not reallytrueforhumidity! ps T qv
Spread «reduction» after LETKF • Large reduction in surfacepressurespread, boundaryeffects… • Onlysmallreduction in temperaturespreadat 900m ps K K T@900m
First impression • LETKF technicallyworks • Comparisonwithsurfaceobservationssuggest • Generally: LETKF betterthan NO_OBS, but worsethannudging • Assimilation ofsurfacepressureappearstoworkparticularlywell • Differencesbetween LETKF andnudginglargestatnoonand in the Po valley • Large RMSE in Td_2m (not assimilated in anyoftheexperiments) • LETKF_DET analysisgenerallyverycloseto LETKF ensemblemean • SPPT hasonlysmall but positive impact
Next steps • Look atcovarianceinflation (seemstobe a technicalproblem) • Revise LBC strategy (IFS det + IFS EPS perturbations) • Look atdiagnosticsandinnovationstatistics (NEFFprove!) • Continuewithidealizedtestsanddeveloptoolforsyntheticobservations • Start withdeterministicanalysisfor COSMO-1