530 likes | 657 Views
Presentation: " Natural Deduction – Introduction“. Introductory Logic PHI 120. Bring this book to lecture. Homework. Handout The Rules Homework First step in learning the rules: Elimination Rules What are they? (Literally, can you name them?) Why are they called "elimination" rules?
E N D
Presentation: "Natural Deduction – Introduction“ Introductory LogicPHI 120 Bring this book to lecture
Homework • Handout • The Rules • Homework First step in learning the rules: • Elimination Rules • What are they? (Literally, can you name them?) • Why are they called "elimination" rules? • Introduction Rules • What are they? (Literally, can you name them?) • Why are they called "introduction rules? Second step in learning the rules: • pp. 19-26 • “primitive rules” • “elimination” and “introduction” rules (only) Important: bring to every class!! Start learning these rules of deduction
Homework Exam 1 Being graded by your TA Will be handed back in your section (In lecture, we’re pressing on)
New Unit Logical Proofs “Natural Deduction” How it works Worthwhile to turn to page 40.
& (ampersand)
Simple Valid Argument Forms &E (ampersand elimination)
Simple Valid Argument Forms Let’s presume the conjunction is true
Simple Valid Argument Forms &E Ampersand-Elimination Given a sentence that is a conjunction, conclude either conjunct
Simple Valid Argument Forms &I (ampersand introduction)
Simple Valid Argument Forms Let’s presume the two sentences are true
Simple Valid Argument Forms &I Ampersand-Introduction Given two sentences, conclude a conjunction of them.
v (wedge)
Simple Valid Argument Forms vE (wedge elimination) Let’s presume the two sentences are true
Simple Valid Argument Forms vE Wedge-Elimination Given a disjunction and another sentence that is the denial of one of its disjuncts, conclude the other disjunct
Simple Valid Argument Forms vI (wedge introduction) Let’s presume this premise is true
Simple Valid Argument Forms Let’s presume this premise is true
Simple Valid Argument Forms vI Wedge-Introduction Given a sentence, conclude any disjunction having it as a disjunct.
-> (arrow)
Simple Valid Argument Forms ->E (arrow elimination) Let’s presume the two sentences are true
Simple Valid Argument Forms ->E Arrow-Elimination Given a conditional and its antecedent, conclude the consequent.
Simple Valid Argument Forms ->I (arrow introduction) Let’s presume this premise is true
Simple Valid Argument Forms ->I Arrow-Introduction Given any sentence, conclude a conditional with it as the consequent.
<-> (double-arrow)
Simple Valid Argument Forms <->E (double-arrow elimination)
Simple Valid Argument Forms Let’s presume the biconditional is true
Simple Valid Argument Forms Antecedent Consequent
Simple Valid Argument Forms Antecedent Consequent
Simple Valid Argument Forms Antecedent Consequent
Simple Valid Argument Forms Antecedent Consequent <->E Double-Arrow Elimination Given a biconditional, conclude one or the other arrow statements
Simple Valid Argument Forms Let’s presume these premises are true <->I (double-arrow introduction)
Simple Valid Argument Forms 2 conditions
Simple Valid Argument Forms 2 conditions <->I Double-Arrow Introduction Given two mirror conditionals, conclude the biconditional
Elimination Introduction &Eampersand elimination vEwedge elimination ->Earrow elimination <->Edouble-arrow elimination &Iampersand introduction vIwedge introduction ->Iarrow introduction <->Idouble-arrow introduction Rules of Derivation