210 likes | 391 Views
Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market. Measuring Skills and Skill Use: Results from the REFLEX Project. Jim Allen. SKOPE International Symposium on Skill Measurement & Certification, Oxford, 22nd September 2011. Overview. Brief description of the REFLEX Project
E N D
Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market Measuring Skills and Skill Use: Results from the REFLEX Project Jim Allen SKOPE International Symposium on Skill Measurement & Certification, Oxford, 22nd September 2011.
Overview • Brief description of the REFLEX Project • Skill measurement issues • The measures used • Some outcomes • What we have learned
REFLEX Project • Financed by EU 6th Framework Program • 10 research teams from 9 countries: Austria, Germany, Spain, Finland, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, the UK • 4 affiliated teams: Switzerland, Portugal, Czech Republic and Japan • Extension to new/candidate EU member states: HEGESCO Project (Slovenia, Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, Turkey • Project coordination: ROA (NL) • Time schedule: 2004 – 2008
Aims of the REFLEX project • To describe the demands made on higher education graduates and the resulting required competencies • To assess to what extent higher education is able to meet these demands • To assess which characteristics of higher education foster the acquisition of the relevant competencies • To assess how firms and organisations help or hinder graduates in using their competencies • To analyse the mechanisms through which employers and employees strive to fulfil their goals • To achieve these aims, we needed some measure of graduate skills/competences
Skill measurement issues • Tests (direct assessments) not a viable option: • Not feasible in a self-administered web/pen-and-paper based survey • Focus on skills in the cognitive domain; neglect of ‘soft’ skills • Self-reports the only realistic option • But reliability and validity may be a problem • What actions could we take to reduce these problems?
Our measurement strategy (short version) • 1. Recognize limitations of self-assessments: avoid e.g. country rankings based on measures • 2. Use outcomes to determine relative rather than absolute levels of different competences: which are available/required at the highest level? • 3. Assess own and required level on the same scale => provides a view on shortages and surpluses at work, even if the original scales contain measurement error • 4. Strive for items that were as coherent and unambiguous as possible
What have we learned? (1) • Self-assessed skills can be a useful component of graduate/labour market surveys • Should not be used to compile ranking lists of countries etc. • Sheds light on which skills are more or less important in the world of work • These patterns are broadly similar across countries • Exceptions are comprehensible and consistent with prior knowledge about the countries concerned
What have we learned? (1) • Asking own and required level on the same scale yields interesting insights into skill shortages and surpluses • Perceived strong and weak points of HE are somewhat related to shortages, but not at all to surpluses • Shortages and surpluses plausibly related to labour market outcomes, training investments, etc.
Thank you for your attention! • For more information on the REFLEX and HEGESCO projects, see: • http://www.fdewb.unimaas.nl/roa/reflex/ • http://www.hegesco.org/