1 / 8

Project – Details of submission

Project – Details of submission. Deadline: November 18 th , Format: PDF

kkerry
Download Presentation

Project – Details of submission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project – Details of submission • Deadline: November 18th , Format: PDF • Together with the project report you must submit a declaration of not cheating. The form can be found here: http://www.uio.no/english/studies/admin/examinations/cheating/declaration.pdf or here: http://www.uio.no/studier/admin/eksamen/fusk/egenerklering-bm.pdf • Submit • both report and form in Fronter, or • report via email to anastp@ifi.uio.no with cc to bentea@ifi.uio.no, and hand in declaration form on paper to Bente Anda either • in the lecture on November 11th , or • in post box at 4th floor at IFI by November 18th

  2. Project – Report structure • A (realistic) software process improvement plan for a software development organization • Cover page (Title, Author(s), Date, Email, Course ID, ...) • Table of content • Content (details on the nextslides) • References

  3. Project – Report content 1/3 • Improvementcontext • Briefdescriptionoforganization (real or imagined) • Software product(s) • Problem and possiblyhow it wasidentified • Baseline process (basedonHomework 1) • Currentprocess (textualdescription) • Current roles, activities, artefacts and tools • Graphicalprocessmodel • ImprovementGoal(s) • What? • Howmuch? • When?

  4. Project – Report content 2/3 • Suggestedchanges, • The scope of the change, that is, the process or activity that will be changed • Typeofchange, i.e. • Introductionof new process, methods or techniques? • Change in process? • Organizational change (team organization, human factors..)? • Updated graphical process model • Plan • What? When? Responsible?

  5. Project – Report content 3/3 • Measurements (based on Homework 2) • Who will collect/report data? • When (how often) will data be corrected? • How is data collected, for example using which tools ? • How is data quality and validity ensured, who is for example responsible? Also discuss possible challenges related to data collection and data validity. • Discussion • Rationale for changes • Risks

  6. Project – Evaluation • Maximum number of marks: 16 • Content = 12 marks • Clarity/Conciseness = 3 marks • Formality (cover page, captions, referencing, etc.) = 1 mark • Section 2 should be based on much reuse from Homework 1, and Section 6 correspondingly on reuse from Homework 2, but you must • make sure that all comments that you previously got on your Homeworks are addressed in the report, and • make the necessary adjustments to fit the rest of the report. • Note that the marks on the report will be completely independent of previous marks on Homework 1 and 2. • Evaluation results will be ready one week before exam

  7. Evaluation of individual vs. group submissions • In a group all members get the same number of marks • The same quality is expected regardless of whether you do the project individually or in a group, but length should be related to number of people • 15-20 pages from 1 person • 18-23 pages from 2 people • 20-25 pages from 3 people • The additional length is in particular expected in Sections 4 and 6, with more suggestions for changes/improvements and more discussion

  8. Evaluation of real vs. imagined case • Basically the same expectations and evaluation, but • with a real case the description of the organization current problem(s) (Section 1) and a realistic plan (Section 5) should be emphasized, and • with an imagined case suggestions for changes (Section 4) and discussion (Section 7) should be based on curriculum and emphasized.

More Related