210 likes | 344 Views
R EPORT O F R OUND 2 AND 3. C LUSTER 2. Cluster Coordinator: K istono AR. C ONTEN T:. Members of Cluster 2 Round 2 Achievements Use of E-mail Groups klaster2_sppmp@yahoogroups.com List of Problems Round 3 Progress Suggestions. 2. MEMBERS OF CLUSTER 2. BDK BANDUNG
E N D
REPORT OFROUND 2 AND 3 CLUSTER2 Cluster Coordinator: Kistono AR
CONTENT: • Members of Cluster 2 • Round 2 Achievements • Use of E-mail Groups klaster2_sppmp@yahoogroups.com • List of Problems • Round 3 Progress • Suggestions 2
MEMBERS OF CLUSTER 2 • BDK BANDUNG • BDK PALEMBANG LPMP JABAR LPMP BANTEN LPMP LAMPUNG LPMP BABEL LPMP SUMSEL LPMP BENGKULU 3
LIST OF ACCEPTANCE ACTIONPLANS & WEEKLYREPORTS
ACTION PLANKELOMPOK LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (LM) • LPMP : 6 (100%) • BDK : 0 (0%) AVERAGE:75%
ACTION PLANQUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM (QA) • LPMP : 6 (100%) • BDK : 1 (50%) AVERAGE:87,50%
WEEKLYREPORTS (LM & QA)(BY INSTITUTIONS) • LPMP JABAR : 100% • LPMP BANTEN : 0% • LPMP LAMPUNG : 28.57% • LPMP BABEL : 100% • LPMP SUMSEL : 71.43% • LPMP BENGKULU : 100% • BDK BANDUNG : 0% • BDK PALEMBANG : 14.29% AVERAGE :51.79%
WEEKLY REPORTSLM & QA TEAMS (BY WEEK) • WEEK 1: 62.50% • WEEK 2: 50% • WEEK 3: 50% • WEEK 4: 37.50% • WEEK 5: 50% • WEEK 6: 50% • WEEK 7: 50% AVERAGE:51.79%
TASKS ACCOMPLISHMENTLEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT (LM) TEAM LPMP JABAR : 40% LPMP BANTEN : 40% LPMP LAMPUNG : 0% LPMP BABEL : 40% LPMP SUMSEL : 40% LPMP BENGKULU : 20% BDK BANDUNG : 0% BDK PALEMBANG : 0% AVERAGE:06.20%
TASKS ACCOMPLISHEMENTQUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) TEAM • LPMP JABAR : 37.50% • LPMP BANTEN : 25% • LPMP LAMPUNG : 0% • LPMP BABEL : 25% • LPMP SUMSEL : 100% • LPMP BENGKULU : 87.50% • BDK BANDUNG : 0% • BDK PALEMBANG : 0% AVERAGE:34.38%
THE USE OF klaster2_sppmp@yahoogroups.com • No. of members 68 persons (including Pak John, Ibu Renny, Pak Sutarto) • The communication by e-mail was mostly done by a particular person from QA team of each institution, NOT all members made use of e-mail contacts • Some other members are quite active, e.g. Mardan (LPMP Sumsel), Bahdeur (LPMP Banten), Sri Rahayu (LPMP Babel), etc. • Almost no LM members made use of e-mail communications
CONCLUSION:MOSTLY DISAPPOINTING!! • No problems on accomplishing action plans (LPMP=100%), but NOT for BDK (25%) • Only about half (51.79%) of the total weekly reports sent by LPMP and BDK • Very few (6,20%) of LM tasks accomplished (LPMP), but nothing from BDK (0%) • Quite few (34.38%) of QA tasks accomplished by LPMP, but nothing from BDK (0%)
REASONS WHY PROBLEMS OCCUR(based on the informal information from most of the members)
No clear formal information about what’s next after Round 2. No more continuation programme • Tasks accomplishment is not a matter of short-term obligation (longer than 7 weeks) and no more presentation in a particular workshop • PRIORITY is on accomplishing their main duties to achieve the targetted- budget absorbence (DIPA) (considered more important) • They have been very busy carrying out main duties out of town • …?
EFFORTS (having been carried out)TO SOLVE PROBLEMS: • Sending regular reminders about accomplishing the tasks and weekly reports by e-mails, SMS, and direct phone calls • Sending help to clarify the understanding of the tasks • Direct phone calls (by the Head of Cluster 2) to the Heads of LPMP/BDK members • Sending all important documents/articles about EQAIS to support (and encourage) the members’ understanding and motivation
PROGRESS OF ROUND 3 • THE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN SENT BY E-MAIL TO ALL MEMBERS • NO INFORMATION YET FROM THE MEMBERS ABOUT THE PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTING ROUND 3 PROGRAMMES
Sending formal letter (by DG or Dit.Bindiklat) informing about their obligation to accomplish the tasks of Round 2 and programmes for Round 3 (and Round 4?) • Direct (face-to-face) briefing by the DG or Director of Bindiklat to the Heads of LPMP/BDK (in every occasion) about the accomplishment of tasks of Round 2 • Clear agenda about presenting their answers to the tasks of Round 2
Formal guidelines for Round 3 • Formal guidelines about how to adjust their current budget (DIPA) to provide financial support to run the programmes of Round 3 • Clear agenda of formal visits for progress monitoring and evaluation for the purpose of development • Etc…?