1 / 10

Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout ERCOT Board Of Directors Meeting

Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout ERCOT Board Of Directors Meeting April 20, 2004 Sam Jones, COO. Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout NERC Near term actions – October, 2003

konane
Download Presentation

Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout ERCOT Board Of Directors Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout ERCOT Board Of Directors Meeting April 20, 2004 Sam Jones, COO

  2. Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout NERC Near term actions – October, 2003 • Six immediate Regional actions items from early blackout findings NERC Actions to prevent and mitigate the impacts of future cascading blackouts – February, 2004 • Fourteen recommendations approved by the NERC Board NERC Actions to “crispen” its compliance templates - March • Thirty-eight revised and new compliance templates US – Canada final blackout report recommendations – April • Forty-six recommendations related to numerous entities

  3. NERC Near Term Actions October, 2003 Immediate actions for the Regions to investigate and report the results to NERC – Letter from Mike Ghent • Voltage and reactive management • Reliability communications • Features of system monitoring and control systems • Emergency action plans • Training for emergencies • Vegetation management ERCOT reported to NERC that it was compliant with all of these requirements on December 5, 2003

  4. NERC Actions To Prevent And Mitigate The Impacts Of Future Cascading Blackouts February 10, 2004 • 2a – Each Regional Council shall report NERC compliance violations • 2c – NERC committees shall review and update compliance templates • 3a – All Reliability Coordinators and Control Areas shall be audited • 4a – All bulk electric line trips resulting from vegetation shall be reported to the Regions and through the Regions to NERC • 4c – Each transmission owner shall make available its vegetation management procedure • 5a – Regions shall document completion of recommendations • 6 – Certain operators shall receive 5 days of training by 6/30 • 8a – All transmission owner shall evaluate Zone 3 relays by 9/30 • 8b – Regions shall evaluate feasibility of under-voltage relays

  5. NERC Actions To Prevent And Mitigate The Impacts Of Future Cascading Blackouts February 10, 2004 (Continued) • 9 – The OC shall review the NERC Operating Policies for Reliability Coordinators and Control Areas • 12a & b – Regions shall define regional criteria for synchronized recording devices and include GPS time synchronization • 14 – Regions shall establish criteria for validating data used in power flow and dynamic modeling

  6. NERC Actions To Prevent And Mitigate The Impacts Of Future Cascading Blackouts February 10, 2004 – Recommendation 2c The NERC committees shall review and update (“crispen”) the NERC compliance templates • The CCMC reviewed all of the compliance templates and prepared drafts as needed to update and “crispen” them • The CTTF was formed to finalize these revisions and present a full compliance template package to the NERC Board by 3/31/04 • The Board approved the templates on 4/02 • Entities will be required to have and follow • Vegetation management plans • Protective relay maintenance programs • Under-voltage relay scheme maintenance program • Special protection schemes maintenance program

  7. NERC Actions To Prevent And Mitigate The Impacts Of Future Cascading Blackouts February 10, 2004 – Recommendation 9 9- Clarify Reliability Coordinator and Control Area Functions, Responsibilities, Capabilities and Authorities • NERC Operating Policies 5, 6 and 9 were reviewed and clarified, where necessary, by the NERC RCWG and ORS groups • The revisions were posted and reviewed by the NERC community • They are being voted on by the ballot body at this time for adoption • ERCOT was represented on these work groups and is already compliant with the revised requirements A “Best Practices” working group is now formed to review control system and training requirements

  8. US – Canada Final Blackout Report Recommendations • Make reliability standards mandatory – legislation – ERO - penalties • Develop regulator approved funding for NERC and Regions • Obtain independent review of an appropriate long term ERO structure • Examine the future role of the Regions – scope – structure – etc • Require any entity operating as a part of the bulk system to be a member of the Region in who’s footprint it is in • Shield operators who initiate load shedding from liability • Commission an independent study of the relationships among industry restructuring, competition and reliability • Develop enforceable standards for vegetation management and penalties for failure to comply – PUCT

  9. US – Canada Final Blackout Report Recommendations (continued) • Strengthen NERC compliance – violation reporting and compliance audits – public release of results • Strengthen NERC’s reliability readiness audit program – public reports • Improve near and long term training – planners – operators – IT support personnel • Make more effective and wider use of system protection measures • Reevaluate NERC’s existing reliability standards development process and accelerate the adoption of enforceable standards • Implement NERC IT standards – physical and cyber • Provide NERC guidance on employee background checks • Establish clear authority in corporations for physical and cyber security

  10. ?

More Related