180 likes | 196 Views
Sky view of the Mediterranean sea telescopes. FOV for up-going neutrinos. From Mediterranean 24h per day visibility up to declination d ~ -50°. >25%. >75%. C overage of most of the sky (87%) including the Galactic Centre. Galactic sources.
E N D
Sky view of the Mediterranean sea telescopes FOV for up-going neutrinos From Mediterranean 24h per day visibility up to declination d ~-50° >25% >75% • Coverage of most of the sky (87%) including the Galactic Centre R. Coniglione
Galactic sources • SNR expected to be good candidates for high energy neutrinos (>1TeV) • The two best candidates with a high intensity and well measured gamma spectrum: SNR RXJ1713.7-3946 and Vela Jr (RXJ0852.0-4622) SNR RXJ1713.7-3946 Vela Jr (RXJ0852.0-4622) HESS Gamma spectrum HESS Gamma spectrum Source extension R=1° Measured up to 20 TeV Pure exponential a=-2.2 I (20TeV) = 1÷3 10-14 cm-2 s-1 TeV-1 Visibility 84% Source extension ~ R=0.5° Measured up to 100 TeV Cutoff in gamma energy I (20TeV) = 1.7 10-14 cm-2 s-1 TeV-1 Visibility 72% R. Coniglione
Extension and energy cutoff dependence KM3NeT detector The source extension dependence homogeneous emission The energy cutoff dependence Discovery Sensitivity Discovery • Discovery flux increases of about a factor 2 for an extended source with R= 0.5° • Sensitivity (discovery) worsens by an order of magnitude when the cut-off energy decrease from 1PeV to 10TeV From KM3NeT Technical Design Report http://www.km3net.org/KM3NeT-TDR.pdf R. Coniglione
2pt autocorrelation analysis of the ANTARES data Sensitive to a large variety of source structures Relying on data only: systematic uncertainties different from MC based methods • Input: • Cumulative number of event pairs as function of their angular distance • Reference distribution from scrambled data sets
2pt autocorrelation analysis of the ANTARES data • Analysis: • Comparisonbetween data and reference distributions based on Li&Maformalism • Trial factor correction using pseudo experiments 2007-2008 data (selected for point source analysis) Maximum deviation of data from reference distribution 1.1s at DW<7° -> p-value =0.55 Any significant correlation found
The bubbles The observation of high energy gamma from two well shaped giant Bubbles in the Milk Way is one of the recent most exciting discoveries • What mechanism can produce high energy gamma rays? • Are also high energy neutrinos produced? R. Coniglione
The Fermi bubbles observation Fermi LAT observation Meng Su, Tracy R. Slatyer, Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Astrophys. J. 724 1044-1082, 2010 1 <Eg<5 GeV no spatial and intensity variation in the g spectrum Solid angle single bubble 0.34 sr 5 <Eg<50 GeV R. Coniglione
g spectrum The g spectrum is flat in E-2 dN/dE and of high intensity (10-7÷ 10-6 GeV/cm2/s/sr) Mesured up to 100 GeV R. Coniglione
A cartoon picture Bubbles observed also in X-ray and Microwaves In Meng Su et al. bubbles are explained as due to relativistic CR electrons that produce gamma through IC process R. Coniglione
A new model: gammas from a “reservoir” of CR proton and heavy ions in the Galactic center From M. Crocker and F. Aharonian Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 101102 “We show below that a cosmic ray population can explain these structures” ……… “…Finally, we predict that there should be a region of extended, TeV g radiation surrounding the Galactic nucleus on similar size scales to the GeV bubbles with an intensity up to E-2 Fg(TeV) ~10-9 TeV cm-2 s-1 sr-1which should make an interesting target for future g-ray studies. Likewise, the region is a promising source for future, Northern Hemiphere, km3-volume neutrino telescope: we estimate (assuming a g=2.0 proton spectrum cut-off 1 PeV)…. From simple calculations the expected neutrino flux is of the order of 10-7GeV cm-2 s-1 Is this flux visible with a high energy neutrino detector ? R. Coniglione
KM3NeT detector lay-out Artist impression of KM3NeT • KM3NeT in numbers • (full detector) • ~300 DU • 20 storey/DU • 40m storey spacing • ~ 1 km DU height • ~ 180m DU distance • ~ 5 km3 volume The Storey Detection Units Primary Junction box Secondary Junction boxes Electro-optical cable The OM All the technical information in http://www.km3net.org/KM3NeT-TDR.pdf R. Coniglione
The MC simulations Monte Carlo Simulations (same codes of ANTARES modified for a km3 detector) • Neutrino generation and interaction (CC & NC) + natm generation (Bartol flux) and interaction (CC & NC) (GENHEN) + matm (Mupage parameterization) • Light simulation (optical water properties) and hit generation (PMT simulation) (KM3 code) • K40 Background and electronics • Track reconstruction based on likelihood Discovery flux calculation • Minimization of Model Discovery Potential (MDP) optimizing on: L (related to the reconstruction quality), #hits (related to the muon energy), Rbin search cone R. Coniglione
The neutrino generation Homogeneous generation in a circular region around fixed points (modified version of GENHEN code) Galactic coordinates Up going tracks Visibility North ~72% South ~ 83 % North d = -15° RA = 243° Radius =19° South d = -44° RA = 298° Radius =19° R. Coniglione
Discovery flux Bubbles north + south KM3NeT detector of about 310 DU • ~months for the evidence (3s) • ~1 years to claim the discovery (5s) R. Coniglione
Fermi bubbles in ANTARES Searches for neutrino from Fermi bubbles in ANTARES just started Reduced set of data used (about 1 month) (blind analysis) Comparison Data/Monte Carlo in progress (MUPAGE for atmospheric muon production, GENHEN for atmospheric neutrino and antineutrino production) Analysis similar to the diffuse flux analysis Background rejection: Atmospheric muons: cuts on the measured zenith angle, track reconstruction quality parameter and number of hits. Selection based on Monte Carlo. Atmospheric neutrinos: cuts on the R parameter related to the neutrino energy. Ri= number of hits on i-th PMT R = ΣRi / number of all PMTs contributing to the event Soft cuts applied up-going tracks L > -6 Nlines >1 Nhits >60 Angular error <1° Geometrical cuts • Data • MC natm • MC matm Preliminary
Fermi bubbles in ANTARES Assuming a E-2 neutrino spectrum with intensity of 1 10-7 GeV cm-2 s-1 the expected observation time needed for the discovery (5s 50%) is of about 5 years PRELIMINARY RESULTS from MC
Conclusions • Extended and very extended sources present in our galaxy -> appropriate analysis required • Fermi bubbles predictions very sensitive to the shape of the neutrino spectrum • Fermi bubbles ANTARES analysis on going • Good chance to see neutrinos from Fermi Bubbles R. Coniglione