1 / 18

Civil Rights

Civil Rights. Civil Liberty vs. Civil Rights. Civil liberties —guaranteed safety of persons, opinions or property from arbitrary actions of government In other words …laws that protect citizens from the abuses of government

kris
Download Presentation

Civil Rights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Civil Rights

  2. Civil Liberty vs. Civil Rights • Civil liberties—guaranteed safety of persons, opinions or property from arbitrary actions of government • In other words…laws that protect citizens from the abuses of government • Civil rights—positive actions of government to seek constitutional guarantees for all people • In other words…laws that provided Constitutional protection by the government

  3. Civil Rights…A Brief History

  4. The Failure of Reconstruction • Political Hope • 13th Amendment ended slavery. • 14thAmendment made any person born or naturalized a citizen, and gave them “equal protection” and “due process of law”. • 15th Amendment had promised to give blacks full voting rights. • Political Realities • Racial discrimination • Poll taxes and literacy tests, voter intimidation • Poor and illiterate whites could vote, blacks couldn’t

  5. The Failure of Reconstruction • Economic Hopes • Reconstruction hoped to destroy the plantation system, and redistributing land to former slaves—“40 acres and a mule” • Economic Realities • Northern concerns over constitutionally protected property rights, never really redistributed any substantial amounts of land. • But, white landowners still needed mass amounts of workers to till the fields. • Thus, plantation slavery was replaced by sharecropping

  6. The Failure of Reconstruction • Social Hopes • 14th Amendment had promised a “color blind” society in which blacks and whites would be treated equally. • Social Realities • Jim Crow Laws—Southern states pass strict laws designed to keep the races separate—housing, schools, hospitals, drinking fountains, beaches, cemeteries, etc. • Plessyv. Ferguson—1896…even the Supreme Court abandons black Americans by stating that separate facilities are constitutional as long as they are equal.

  7. Modern Civil Rights: Integration • Brown v. Board of Education—1954 • Declared the previous “separate, but equal” rationale of Plessyv. Ferguson to be unconstitutional • Violated the 14th Amendment “equal protection clause” • The Court ordered the States to make a “prompt and reasonable start” to end segregation

  8. Modern Civil Rights: Integration • By 1970, de juresegregation (segregation required by law) was abolished • But, de factosegregation (segregation that existed in fact) was still occurring • Loving v. Virginia (1967) • State miscegenation laws against interracial marriage declared unconstitional

  9. Modern Civil Rights: Integration • Today, issues like bussing and redistricting to address the socio- economic and racial integration have been instituted to ensure “equal protection”

  10. Modern Civil Rights: Gender Equality • 19th Amendment extended suffrage to women • Title IX of the Education Am. of 1972 gave equal protection to females in “any educational program that receives federal financial assistance” • The Supreme Court has upheld 14th Amendment equal protection for women: • Jury duty (Taylor v. Louisiana,1975) • In private military academies (VMI) (US v. Virginia,1996)

  11. Federal Civil Rights Laws • Civil Rights protection extends to: • Race • Color • Religion • National origin • Sex • Physical disability (in some cases) • Age (in some cases)

  12. Modern Civil Rights: Civil Rights Acts • Civil Rights Act of 1964 • Longest debate in Senate history—83 days • Extended protection of voting rights • Protected against discrimination in public facilities (restaurants, movie theaters, etc.) • Forbid employers or unions to discriminate

  13. Modern Civil Rights: Civil Rights Acts • Civil Rights Act of 1968 • Often called the Open Housing Act • With some exceptions, make it unconstitutional to refuse to sell or rent based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability. • Also discriminatory to refuse families with children. • 1988, Congress gave it “criminal” legal status.

  14. Modern Civil Rights: Affirmative Action • Affirmative Action—a policy that requires most employers and institutions to take positive steps to remedy the effects of past discrimination • Quotas-Companies are required to hire a % of minority and female employees

  15. Modern Civil Rights: Affirmative Action • Critics argue it promotes “reverse discrimination” • They say it removes merit and ability—giving the job to a less-qualified minority, rather than the “best person for the job.” • In recent years, California, Washington, and Michigan, voters have overwhelmingly chosen to eliminate their states’ affirmative action policies

  16. Modern Civil Rights: Affirmative Action • Significant Supreme Court cases • Regents of U. of Cal. V. Bakke(1978) • Bakke, a white medical school applicant • 16 of 100 seats were set aside for minorities • Court ruled the quota violated 14th Am. Equal Protection Clause

  17. Modern Civil Rights: Affirmative Action • Adarand Construction v. Pena (1995) • Construction company who challenged the Federal Highway Admin. awarding of bonuses to firms who subcontracted at least 10% to “disadvantaged” businesses • Court ruling tightened requirements—only if it shows “compelling government interest”

  18. Modern Civil Rights: Affirmative Action • Schuettev. the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (2014) • Court upheld Michigan’s state ban on affirmative action, stating it did not violate the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause because it was a policy chosen by the voters of Michigan • Arguments that affirmative action may do “more harm than good…”

More Related