1 / 39

Parlemeter – Autumn 2011

Parlemeter – Autumn 2011. 10 janvier 2011. Methodology. Methodology. Special Eurobarometer. Survey conducted face to face in the respondents’ homes Fieldwork : 5 - 20 November 2011 Population : representative sample aged 15+ Scope : 27 Member States of the European Union

kris
Download Presentation

Parlemeter – Autumn 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Parlemeter – Autumn 2011 10 janvier 2011

  2. Methodology

  3. Methodology Special Eurobarometer • Survey conducted face to face in the respondents’ homes • Fieldwork: 5 - 20 November 2011 • Population: representative sample aged 15+ • Scope: 27 Member States of the European Union • Number of interviews: 26,594 3

  4. Structure

  5. Structure INFORMATION ABOUT THE EP KNOWLEDGE OF THE EP IMAGE AND ROLE OF THE EP PRIORITIES AND VALUES OF THE EP 5

  6. A. Information about the EP

  7. A.1 Visibility of the EP in the media - Great progress (+10) (-9) 7

  8. A.1 Visibility of the EP Greater recall among the most advantaged categories 8

  9. A.1 Visibility of the EP – Progress in almost all MS 9

  10. A.2 How well-informed are Europeans?Despite a slight improvement, still only a minority feel well-informed Very well informed : 2% DK: 2% Total “well informed”: 32% (+4) Total “badly informed” : 66% (-3) 10

  11. A.2 How well-informed are Europeans?Significant progress in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Lithuania 11

  12. A.3 Preferred sources of information – The Internet now rivals the written press 12

  13. A.3 Preferred sources of information – Socio-demographic profiles 13

  14. A.4 Subjects debated in the EPEuropeans would like more information about solutions to the crisis and citizens’ rights 14

  15. A.4 Subjects debated in the EPCitizens’ rights 15

  16. B. Knowledge of the EP

  17. B.1 Knowledge of how MEPs sit in the EP – A very slight improvement +1 -2 +1 17

  18. B.2 Decisions in the EP– A majority now believe that decisions reflect the political affinities of MEPS +8 +2 -5 -5 18

  19. B.2 Decisions in the EP– Significant progress in almost all MS 19

  20. B.2 Decisions in the EP – Significant progress in almost all MS 20

  21. B.3 Objective knowledge of the EP -Little change, except on agreement between EP/MS on European laws EB76.3 Nov. 2011 (item 2-3) EB73.1 Jan.-Feb. 2010 (item1-4) EB71.1 Jan. -Feb. 2009 Correct answers 21

  22. C. Image and role of the EP

  23. C.1 Overall image of the EPSharp decline in the EP’s image Very positive : 2% DK: 2% Total “positive”: 26% (-8) Total “negative” : 26% (+9) 23

  24. C.1 Overall image of the EPDecline in all MS except Sweden 24

  25. C.1 Overall image of the EPSocio-demographic profiles 25

  26. C.2 Aspects of the EP’s imageAll the positive items have lost ground… 61% (-2) 27% (+3) 38% (-1) 44% (+2) 54% (+4) 33% (-2) 26

  27. C.2 Aspects of the EP’s imageWhile “inefficient” has gained ground 51% (=) 41% (=) 42% (+4) 39% (-1) 27

  28. C.2 Aspects of the EP’s imageA distinctly better image among the best informed citizens 28

  29. C.3 Role of the PE: perceptionMore widespread perception of the importance of the EP’s role Not at all important: 3% Total “Not important” : 17% (=) Total “Important”: 77% (+7) 29

  30. C.3 Role of the PE: perceptionPerceptions of the importance of the EP’s role are up in almost all MS 30

  31. C.3 Role of the PE: perceptionPerceptions of the importance of the EP’s role are up in almost all MS 31

  32. C.4 Role of the EP: wishesThe wish to see the EP play a more important role is down, but this is still the majority view (-7) (+8) (-2) (+1) 32

  33. C.4 Role of the EP: wishesShift of opinion is mainly from ‘more important’ to ‘the same’ 33

  34. C.4 Role of the EP: wishesShift of opinion is mainly from ‘more important’ to ‘the same’ 34

  35. D. Priorities and values of the EP

  36. D.1 Priority policiesCoordinating economic, budget and tax policies marks clear progress * -2 +9 -2 +5 -1 -3 -4 -3 +5 *Answers higher than 20% showed in this figure 36

  37. D.1 Priority policiesPolicy coordination gains ground in almost all MS 37

  38. D.2 Values to be defended as a matter of priority–A stable hierarchy (max. 3 Answers) 38

  39. Thank you for your attention

More Related