240 likes | 374 Views
Competency for the IP training institutions. Li Xun, program manager China Intellectual Property Training Centre SIPO, CHINA Mar. 26, 2009. 0UTLINE. General comparison KPI extraction SWOT analysis Questionnaire analysis Recommendation. General Comparison.
E N D
Competency for theIP training institutions Li Xun, program manager China Intellectual Property Training Centre SIPO, CHINA Mar. 26, 2009
0UTLINE • General comparison • KPI extraction • SWOT analysis • Questionnaire analysis • Recommendation
General Comparison • For each field, an ideal model is set up.
KPI extraction • General characteristics • Common characteristics with educational institutes • Particular characteristics
KPI extraction Location Option Strategy Balance General Implementation Influence
KPI Extraction • Common characteristics of education institutes: Educational Elements • Educational Elements include: curriculum, teachers, textbooks, educational evaluations, educational methods, education research • Particular characteristics:1)Speciality 2) Practicality 3) Cross disciplinary 4) Rapid changes in law, policy, social and economic environment, etc. 5)IP globalization
SWOT analysis, China (Strength) • Support from relative leaders (strong government background) • Focus on IP training • Underlying integration ability • Comprehensive and systematic curriculum • Huge trainee scale
SWOT analysis (weakness) • Requirements need to be further cultivated • Negative influence of traditional culture • Lack of direct connection with possible trainees • Incomplete statutory examination system • Lack of teachers from IP utilization fields (such as enterprise) Stage-3:IP profitable aggressive Stage-2: Focus on IP quality defensive Stage-1: Focus on IP quantity
SWOT analysisopportunity • Implementation of NIPS • Transition of economic development modality • Tendency to build up strong networks • Rapid increase of patent quantity and quality
SWOT analysis(Threat) • Ruined IP training market • Information (investigation) is easy to be distorted within a large territory.
Strategy score Questionnaire analysis Strategy score 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 partner no partner annual plan organization evaluation new program sensitiveness focus adjustment supplementary plan
Implementation score Questionnaire analysis Implementation score 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 law language specify education consultants teacher evaluation courses for different field group management participants’ opinion
Questionnaire analysis Influence score 3.5 3 2.5 Influence score 2 1.5 1 budget1 budget2 budget3 budget4 branches good effect propagation generous training specified training comment from trainees
New program Evaluation Sensitivity Questionnaire analysisCorrelation New program ? Partner No partner
complexity 45 of 40 organization 35 new 30 information 25 gathering 20 cost of 15 analysis 10 5 0 cost of coordination 1 2 3 4 Questionnaire analysis
Questionnaire analysisCorrelation Evaluation Participantsopinion Teacher evaluation Self evaluation of participants Working group
General Training Specified training Total effect judgment Questionnaire analysisCorrelation Acceptance from trainees
Recommendation • To strengthen the integration ability (Education elements, training network) • To improve the flexibility (investigation and evaluation), and establish effective communication or feedback channel with possible trainees • Based on the R.2, further to perfect each education element • Successful public program depending on the effective management of a training network. The training network should be set up step by step to avoid exhaustion. • To strengthen the cooperation with foreign counterparts for an information and teacher exchange.
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION! zibinglx@263.net