1 / 26

GREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION BOARD OF DIRECTORS PLANNING RETREAT JANUARY 10, 2005

GREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION BOARD OF DIRECTORS PLANNING RETREAT JANUARY 10, 2005. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS. RESPONSES BOARD MEMBERS: 23 (Takes into consideration recent resignations and new Board members who did not fill out

kueng
Download Presentation

GREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION BOARD OF DIRECTORS PLANNING RETREAT JANUARY 10, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION BOARD OF DIRECTORS PLANNING RETREAT JANUARY 10, 2005 GR-11D presentation2005final.010405

  2. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS

  3. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS RESPONSES BOARD MEMBERS: 23 (Takes into consideration recent resignations and new Board members who did not fill out questionnaire) NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS: 23 (100%) CLASSIFICATION PROVIDERS 6/6 Responses (100%) INSURERS 2/2 Responses (100%) PURCHASERS 6/6 Responses (100%) GOVERNMENT 3/3 Responses (100%) AT LARGE 1/1 Responses (100%) CONSUMERS 4/4 Responses (100%) UNKNOWN 1 Response

  4. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part I Current Activities Rank 1 thru 11 with 1 being most important 1. Friendly AccessSM & Friendly AccessSMInfant Mortality Initiative 2. Cost & Resource Planning Committee 3. Diabetes Task Force 4. Flint Healthcare Employment Opportunities 5. Heart Failure Task Force

  5. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part I Current Activities Rank 1 thru 11 with 1 being most important 6. Health Improvement Committee 7. Pharmacy Task Force TIE 7. REACH Task Force 9. Mental Health and Substance Use Task Force 10. Prompt Payment Task Force 11. Back Pain Management Task Force

  6. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Compare Top Five for 2001 and 2005 2001 2005 • Friendly AccessSM (& FAIMI) • Cost & Resource Planning • Diabetes Task Force • Flint Healthcare Employment Opportunities • Heart Failure Task Force • Cost & Resource Planning • Group for Low Cost Coverage (GHP) • Diabetes Task Force • Prescription Drug Utilization • Prompt Payment Task Force

  7. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part II Grant Funded Projects • “Which projects correspond to the Mission of GFHC” • Improve the health status of our citizens • Improve the quality & cost effectiveness of the health care system in our community “Which projects have Value to community”

  8. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Responses Part II Board Members 23 Number of Respondents 23 (100%) Number of Respondents to Part I 23 (100%) Number of Respondents to Part II 18 (82%)

  9. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Grant Funded Projects “Corresponds to Mission of GFHC” Rank Order 1-10 with 10 being the highest Friendly AccessSM Infant Mortality Initiative 9.2 Friendly AccessSM 8.7 GAP Heart Failure Project 8.7 AMI GAP 8.6 Genesee Health Plan 8.6

  10. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Grant Funded Projects “Corresponds to Mission of GFHC” Rank Order 1-10 with 10 being the highest MiChild/Healthy Kids 8.0 REACH 2010 (Undoing Racism Workshops) 8.0 Flint Healthcare Employment Opportunities 7.7 Michigan Regional Skills Alliance 7.2 Demand Treatment! 6.7

  11. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Grant Funded Projects “Value to the Community” Rank Order 1-10 with 10 being the highest GAP Heart Failure Project 8.9 Genesee Health Plan 8.9 Friendly AccessSM Infant Mortality Initiative 8.7 Flint Healthcare Employment Opportunities 8.5 AMI GAP 8.4

  12. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Grant Funded Projects “Value to the Community” Rank Order 1-10 with 10 being the highest MiChild/Healthy Kids 8.3 Friendly AccessSM 8.2 Michigan Regional Skills Alliance 7.8 REACH 2010 7.7 Demand Treatment! 7.0

  13. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS MISSION Friendly AccessSM Infant Mortality Initiative Friendly AccessSM GAP Heart Failure Project AMI GAP Genesee Health Plan MiChild/Healthy Kids REACH 2010 Flint Healthcare Employment Opportunities Michigan Regional Skills Alliance Demand Treatment! VALUE TO COMMUNITY GAP Heart Failure Project Genesee Health Plan Friendly AccessSM Infant Mortality Initiative Flint Healthcare Employment Opportunities AMI GAP MiChild/Healthy Kids Friendly AccessSM Michigan Regional Skills Alliance REACH 2010 Demand Treatment! ? Disconnect

  14. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part III – Board Member Views Rank Order (out of possible 5.0) Strongly Agree to Agree 2005 Results 1997 Results

  15. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part III – Board Member Views Rank Order (out of possible 5.0) Agree to Neutral 2005 Results 1997 Results

  16. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part III – The Role of the Coalition Rank Order (out of possible 5.0) Strongly Agree to Agree 2005 Results 1997 Results

  17. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part III – The Role of the Coalition Rank Order (out of possible 5.0) Agree to Neutral 2005 Results 1997 Results

  18. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part III – The Role of the Coalition Rank Order (out of possible 5.0) Agree to Neutral 2005 Results 1997 Results

  19. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS SPECIAL QUESTIONS Strongly Agree to Agree 4.0 In two cases, Flint Healthcare Employment Opportunities and in infant mortality, the Coalition was asked to assume these activities by the C.S. Mott Foundation and the Michigan Department of Community Health respectively. Do you believe this was a good thing?

  20. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS SPECIAL QUESTIONS Agree to Neutral 3.5 Some of the Coalition's activities e.g. FHEO, infant mortality, racial disparities, health insurance, etc. involve the "problems and issues" of the Flint community, i.e. poverty, neighborhood violence, racism, and education to name a few. Should the Greater Flint Health Coalition take more of a leadership role with the Chamber, business community, and civic leaders in speaking out on these issues and helping to correct them? Comments: • I am cautious on this issue because some of these leaders may have turf issues as well as hidden agendas! I believe we would have to reach out and establish a relationship with the civic leaders. • Provide more education and leadership. Get on their agenda more often. • Write up even more. Write national level articles.

  21. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Comments continued: • This would require careful planning and could reduce or enhance the effectiveness of the Coalition. • Strength of leadership of the Coalition Board could bring greater attention to these issues and specifically assist in making the connection between health and these issues. Board should review opportunities to address issues, determine process of a written or spoken statement presented or engage in partnering in community forums. • The initial goals of the Coalition have expanded a lot and it is difficult for me as a new Board Member to comment with any Board knowledge. With time on Board this will be accomplished. • No. The Coalition should maintain focus on its original mission. Expanding to broader issues may cause some current members to reduce/withdraw support.

  22. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS SPECIAL QUESTIONS Strongly Agree to Agree 4.1 The Coalition has been lauded for its commitment to racial disparities. It has moved that topic forward to its anti-racism activities like sponsoring and promoting Undoing Racism Workshops (15 workshops to date including 579 attendees). Do you feel this anti-racist focus is appropriate for the Coalition? 4.0 Do you feel it should continue this role?

  23. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS SPECIAL QUESTIONS Agree to Neutral 3.7 The success and recognition of the Coalition in some quarters has suggested that the Coalition develop a national profile. Do you see this as a positive development? Strongly Agree to Agree 4.1 If the Coalition was able to retain its community focus, would you see this as not only a positive development but something to strive for?

  24. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part IV Are there activities the Coalition should be involved with that they haven’t been? Yes – 5 No – 5 No Response - 13 If yes, name them: • Priority Children, Ready Set Grow! Passport. • I believe it is essential to begin addressing the issue of long term care and stronger in mental health/substance abuse. Obesity should also get focus – probably Health Improvement Task Force. • Help to Unify the Community Access & Genesee Health Plan.

  25. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part IV Comments continued: • More active in seeking/identifying/disseminating health care quality information. Sponsor more “best practices” discussions. • More aggressive activities focused on the “cost” side of the Health Care equation. Our Quality Focus is right on target, lacking in cost reduction initiatives. • We have enough issues to deal with. More would only cause loss of focus.

  26. RETREAT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS Part IV Is there a question about the Coalition that should have been asked but wasn’t? Yes – 0 No – 9 No Response - 14 Comments: • Should we strive to expand the scope of issues we deal with? Or contract? • Not a question, simply a desire to establish specific and measurable goals & objectives for GFHC activities, i.e. task force initiatives. This would provide metrics to identify value and progress.

More Related