140 likes | 207 Views
This study explores procedural learning in individuals with HIV and substance dependence, focusing on striatal damage and the impact of substance use. Results suggest poorer performance in HIV+ individuals and an interaction between substance use severity and HIV status.
E N D
Procedural Learning among HIV+ and HIV- individuals with Substance Dependence R. Gonzalez, J. Jacobus, J.W. Rodriguez, E.H. Fakhoury, E.M. Martin
Brief Background • HIV is associated with striatal damage • Substance use affects striatal systems • Striatum is critical for procedural learning • Procedural learning in HIV & substance use • A. Martin et al., (1993) • Kalechstein et al., (1998) • Van Gorp et al., (1999) • Waldrop et al., (2001)
Try to guess “sun” or “rain” based on cards Participants are not told probability structure 4 trial blocks, 50 cards each PL Measures Mirror Tracing (MT) Pursuit Rotor (PR) • Trace star seeing only mirror image • Go quickly, stay inside lines • 4 trial blocks, 2 trials each • DV = time to complete • Follow light around circle • 55 rpm • 4 trial blocks, 2 20s trials each • DV = seconds on target Weather Prediction (WP)
Performance Indices | General Deficit (Main Effect) | PL Deficit (Group X Time) | # Errors Performance on PL Tasks Control Group Learning Performance Clinical Group Time (Trial Blocks)
Hypotheses • HIV+ participants: • poorer performance, overall, on measures of PL • General Deficit • less improvement in performance over time on PL tasks • PL Deficit • More severe substance use: • poorer performance overall and with poorer PL • Interaction between HIV and substance use
Participants • 79 adults with history of cocaine and/or heroin dependence • HIV- : n = 33 • HIV+: n = 46 • Negative u-tox & alcohol breath test • No cocaine or heroin use in last 7 days • No current abuse or dependence for EtOH and other drugs • No history of severe thought disorder or unmedicated bipolar disorder • No history of significant loss of consciousness or neurological problems
Demographics Psychiatric & Medical
Summary of Results Mirror Tracing HIV Main Effect: HedgesES = 0.65, 95%CI [0.20, 1.11] Significant 3-way interactions
PR Interaction Effect HIV + HIV – PR change PR change KMSK KMSK n = 33 n = 46 R2 = .03, p = .24 R2 = .16, p = .02 ↑ improvement in PR was associated with history of ↑severe drug use [only for HIV- subjects]
MT Interaction Effect HIV + HIV – MT change MT change KMSK KMSK n = 33 n = 46 R2 = .03, p = .26 R2 = .12, p = .05 ↑ improvement in MT was associated with history of ↑severe drug use [only for HIV- subjects]
Summary • HIV+ subjects generally performed worse, overall, on PL tasks • Significant differences on Mirror Tracing • Evidence suggests general deficit • History of substance use severity and HIV serostatus interacted to affect procedural learning
Possible Explanations • Supersensitivity of striatal dopamine receptors • Process disrupted by HIV • HIV+ participants fairly “healthy” • Control group consisted of individuals with substance dependence • Amount of striatal damage not sufficient for functional deficits • HIV deficits are “spotty” affecting multiple systems
Acknowledgements • NIDA • F32 DA018522 (RG) • R01 DA12828 (EMM) • University of Illinois Chicago, Dept. of Psychiatry • HIV & Addictions Neuroscience • Eileen Martin, PhD • Jasmin Vassileva, PhD • Pyrai Vaughn • Elizabeth Walczak • Leslie Ladd • Sarah Wicks