The Apple iPad

1. The next step in tablet computers The Apple iPad

2. Roger’s (2003) six steps • Much like other innovations, the iPad followed a similar path to Roger’s six steps of innovation: • Recognition of a problem or need • Research • Development • Commercialization • Diffusion/Adoption • Consequences

3. Need • While laptop computer allows users to work in mobile environments, they have issues that innovators looked to solve: • Short battery life • Weight • Portable, but only to a point

4. Research • Apple began work on a tablet-like device called the Newton MessagePad 100. • The iPad was supposed to be launched before the iPhone. Steve Jobs felt the iPad features would work similarly on phones. The phone market was booming, and Apple made considerable market gains.

5. Development • Problems: One concern with Apple’s products is that they do not run Flash, a common computer language found on many software programs and web sites. • Apple has faced scrutiny based on short supply of iPad devices. • Also, the lack of choices in carriers for 3G data has caused consumers to be less than enthusiastic

6. Development • Intended audience: Business leaders, students and teachers, medical practitioners, and consumers interested in portable entertainment. • Large market for applications, especially books for all ages. • More companies are gearing applications to secondary and tertiary environments.

7. Commercialization • The iPads are currently produced in Shenzhen, China by Foxconn. Production will be moving to Brazil by the end of 2011. • iPads comes with only the basic charger accessory, thus increasing profits as customers buy keyboards, cases, protection sheets, etc. • Apple only makes one core model of its products. Unlike customization models from other companies, Apple’s product line is streamlined

8. Commercialization • iPad costs about $260 to make, sells for at least $499. • Marketing is sleek by showing actual images from applications being used. Word of mouth sells iPads as well. • Packaging of the iPad is very clean, similar to the iPad itself. There is little more than a white box, basic instructions, and protection packaging.

9. Diffusion/Adoption • While there is limited research on the effectiveness of iPads in the various areas of society, many visionaries see them as necessary tools. • Nurses use iPads to input patient vital stats while beside, not writing them later. • Students read books on iPads instead of paper copies • Business leaders “FaceTime” to have meetings instead of face-to-face

10. Consequences • While we are still early in diffusion of the iPad, some possible consequences of tablet computers: • Extinction of traditional books, magazines, newspapers. • Textbooks can be updated on demand, not during a 7-10 year adoption period • Laptop purchases decline in favor of the more portable tablets.

11. Timeline of communication • Rogers (2003) presented 5 stages of the innovation-decision process. They include: • Stage 1: Knowledge • Stage 2: Persuasion • Stage 3: Decision • Stage 4: Implementation • Stage 5: Confirmation

12. Stage 1: Knowledge • The iPad was announced on January 27, 2010. It was released to the general public in April. • During this time there was much advertising about the product as well as speculation on how it would be similar to the iPhone and iPod devices. • Educators began to learn about the product as it was shown to the masses.

13. Stage 2: Persuasion • Due to the simplicity of the design, ample applications for free/low prices, individuals have been persuaded to use an iPad instead of laptop or other tablet • Educators see iPads as replacements for bulky textbooks and laptops for students • Electronic textbook companies tout easily updateable content as selling point for iPad

14. Stage 3: Decision • Some schools have provided iPads for all students and have dispensed with traditional textbooks • Our organization has purchased 30 devices, enough for a classroom set. • Based on the use of these devices as educational tools, wider adoption could possibly occur.

15. Stage 4: Implementation • Some educators and schools have fully implemented iPad use. Administrators conduct walkthroughs on the devices, teacher use the device for education and recordkeeping, and students access content while multitasking with the device. • Continual use will show if the device is a truly feasible alternative to traditional classroom technology and textbooks.

16. Stage 5: Confirmation • We have not reached the confirmation stage with the iPad in education. • Since there are still many unknowns, such as availability of all courses’ textbooks, schools are holding off on purchases. • Schools see the benefits of the device, but lack funds due to poor economy. This could also move the iPad into rejection since it might prove too costly.

17. Adopters • Rogers (2003) identified 5 adopter categories: • Innovators • Early Adopters • Early Majority • Late Majority • Laggards

18. Innovators • As Rogers (2003) stated, innovators are venturesome. These innovators also have significant financial resources. • iPads were reasonably priced, however many ‘innovators’ paid premiums to reserve one of the first iPads or purchased on secondary market • Innovators contributed to the first five days of sales of the iPad.

19. Early Adopters • Based on the communication from innovators and advertising from Apple, the early adopters began to purchase iPads. • Rogers (2003) stated these individuals have higher levels of respect from their community. Others listen to them and follow their guidance. • Since early adopters began purchasing the iPads, the rest followed. • Early adopters accounted for the first 3 months of sales for Apple.

20. Early Majority • Rogers (2003) stated the Early Majority are more deliberate in their adoption of innovations. The observe the innovation from a distance and see how early adopters react. • Early adopters still use laptop computers and may not want to give up much of the functionality they offer. • The early majority began to purchase the iPad 8-12 months after introduction.

21. Late Majority • While Rogers (2003) qualified the Late Majority as skeptical, they are still likely to adopt the iPad into their lives. • They are seeing how they can actually replace multiple devices (mp3 player, DVD, computer, etc.) with the iPad tablet. • Since they have limited resources, they might consider the iPad as a way to save money on future devices (see above) • As more content such as entertainment media is available for tablets, they are likely to adopt.)

22. Laggards • There will still be individuals who do not purchase an iPad. Many might lack the financial resources to ever make the purchase. • Rogers (2003) also suggested these individuals may be leery of new technology, due to past experiences. They may not see the need to use the device (e.g. age, job, etc.) • If Laggards do purchase the iPads, it might be the 3rd or 4th generation when it becomes obsolete or replaced by a new innovation.

23. S-shaped curve of adoption Innovators Early Adopters Early Majority Late Majority Laggards

24. Innovators • Innovators are going to be the younger teachers who may come from affluent backgrounds. These teachers are just starting out and may have used similar type devices. They may have access to this technology via their colleges and social circles. • Large groups of innovators will be colleges and universities that can afford these devices en masse.

25. Early Adopters • Early adopters will be those teachers who have been working with technology in their classrooms for many years. These teachers already integrate technology but are not innovators. They have seen technology fail in the past, so they are cautious. • Large groups might be private schools or really progressive schools with extra money or grants to spend.

26. Early Majority • Teachers who adopt in the early majority will be those who have seen the previous two adoption groups experience academic progress of their students by using these devices. • They are conscientious about changing their tried and true teaching practices, but if enough early adopters show benefits of the device, they will quickly come on board. • Schools that are already doing well academically, might add these devices as funds permit. They will acquire them in batches and deploy them upon receipt and training.

27. Late Majority • The late majority of teachers who adopt the iPad will only do so when they are required to do so. These teachers are not completely technology averse, but see less benefits compared to traditional teaching methods. • The late majority of teachers might also be those who are not truly effective in teaching. They could also be those who feel there is too much to do on top of learning a new gadget. • Institutions in the late majority might be in remote locations or have very limited funds available for technology purchases.

28. Laggards • Laggards might be teachers at the twilight of their careers. They are soon to retire and see no need to learn a new tool as they are leaving the workforce and heading towards retirement. • Laggards may also be technology averse and/or refuse to use computers except for the most basic of required tasks. • Schools that are laggards are probably the most at-risk schools or those who are just focused on getting students the basic skills. They feel technology does not replace strong teachers. They may be financially close to collapse or in the process of drastically reducing budgets.

29. How to convince the masses • Innovators—convince them the students see the innovation as hip and unique. This might appeal to those teachers looking for a “hook” for their kids. • Early Adopters—show how the iPad is relatively better than a traditional computer (e.g. portability, features, etc.)

30. How to convince the masses • Early Majority– appeal to pedagogical methods and how the iPad can improve their teaching practice. Show how it is not just a toy for kids to play with. • Late Majority—focus on the simplicity of the device. Most applications are intuitive and use no input devices such as keyboards or mice. Show schools with limited budgets how iPads can consolidate many typical technology expenses.

31. How to convince the masses • Laggards—appeal to their experience and how certain technology has improved daily lives and education. It might be a lost cause, but if you can focus on tapping into their wisdom and experience, they might see how the tool can work for them.

32. Perceived attributes • Rogers (2003) mentioned the five perceived attributes: Relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, observability. • For teachers to adopt the iPad into their classrooms, they need to see the relative advantage of the tool and, observe how its use is improving classroom teaching…but most importantly, bottom line results in student achievement.

33. Centralized or Decentralized • In our school teachers have great liberty to develop and present classes that are based on their expertise. • We have shared responsibilities and teachers discuss what works best in instructional practices. • We would best be served by a decentralized approach.

34. Key Change Agents • First, the CATE (career and technology education) would be some key change agents as they teach many kids and have greater use of this type of technology in their classes. • Then we would use department chairs and those who have been effectively using technology in their classes. We would have a good mix of teachers who would be able to diffuse the iPad to the greater group.

35. Change Agents • Rogers (2003) mentioned 7 roles of change agents • Develop a need for change—our change agents would show how not using the iPad could be hurting our student achievement. • Information exchange—CATE teachers can show others how the iPad can actually provide job skills for students, increasing their popularity and usage by kids.

36. Change Agents • Diagnose problems—CATE teachers and department chairs would meet together and diagnose the issues our school is facing in student achievement. • Create intent to change—Our leaders would show the different paths we could go on. They would prescribe solutions, including the use of the iPad.

37. Change Agents • Translate intent to action—through informal conversations and interpersonal relationships, our change agents would help shape opinion toward using the iPad in their classes. • Stabilize adoption—change agents would ensure that the rest of the teachers are continuing to utilize the iPad and are at the confirmation stage of Rogers’ phases of adoption.

38. Change Agents • Terminal relationship—our change agents need to finalize the introduction and diffusion of the adoption to let the teachers begin to rely on themselves to make it work.

39. Critical Mass Yet? • We have not reached the critical mass number quite yet with the iPad. One of Rogers’ (2003) way to continue growing the number of users would be diffusing the iPad to schools at large. • These groups are intact and if there is success in use (via higher student achievement), the iPad would be likely to be adopted by other schools.

40. Needs • More accessible technology in the hands of students, not locked in a closet or computer lab • Modernize our schools’ technology from outdated desktops to tablet computers • Ability to have updated course materials without waiting for textbook adoption periods • Reduce textbook expenditures, balance budget

41. How the iPad meets our needs • Students can carry iPad easily to classes and integrate its use into their daily routines. No need to schedule computer lab time or have laptop carts. • Tablet computers offer similar functions as traditional computers without as many technical issues. Less parts to replace due to wear and tear (mice, keyboard, etc.)

42. How the iPad meets our needs • With integrated WiFi, course content can be downloaded immediately upon arriving on campus. Books can be updated, lessons synchronized, etc. WiFi allows access to up-to-date course material including ancillaries from publishers. • iPads cost less than most laptops and desktop computers. Textbooks cannot be lost or damaged, saving on replacement costs.

43. So why the iPad? • We could have this in our schools:

44. Or this…

45. This…

46. Or this…

47. Links for sources • http://www.pcworld.com/article/193746/apple_ipad_costs_260_to_build_isuppli_finds.html • http://www.apple.com/ipad/features/ • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPad • Kids picture: http://christopherteh.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ipad-and-children.jpg • http://blog.ohinternet.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/bored.jpg

48. References • http://cdn.techi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ipad-books.jpg • http://familychiropracticcentre.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/student-heavy-backpack11.png

49. Links for iPad sales data • http://www.ipadinsider.com/tag/ipad-sales-figures/ • http://ipod.about.com/od/ipadmodelsandterms/f/ipad-sales-to-date.htm • http://blogs.computerworld.com/18550/apple_2011_ipad_sales_hit_40_million