1 / 14

Freya Margand National TAG Program Manager Contact: margand.freya@epa

Freya Margand National TAG Program Manager Contact: margand.freya@epa.gov. EPA’s Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Program Pipeline Safety Trust Conference. TAG Background. CERCLA (sect. 117(e)) as amended by SARA (1986)

lali
Download Presentation

Freya Margand National TAG Program Manager Contact: margand.freya@epa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Freya Margand National TAG Program Manager Contact: margand.freya@epa.gov EPA’s Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) ProgramPipeline Safety Trust Conference

  2. TAG Background • CERCLA (sect. 117(e)) as amended by SARA (1986) • For independent technical assistance in interpreting information • To a groups of individuals affected by the site • From initial investigation through operation and maintenance • Initial award of up to $50,000 • 20% match required • 1988 - TAG regulations finalized (40 CFR Part 35). • October 2, 2000- last revision of regulations. • EPA policies • Regional staff – program implementation • Headquarters – policy issues, national publications, coordination and consistency among regions.

  3. Use of TAG funds • Most of the funds for procuring a technical advisor to: • explain site related technical information • make site visits to learn about activities • travel to meetings/hearings about site • evaluate site plans for reuse • interpret & explain health-related information • Limited amount of funds for grant management and administrative expenses

  4. Not Allowed • No lobbying • No travel for group members • No lawsuits or legal assistance/actions • No social activities, fundraising or entertaining • No tuition or training (one-time health & safety for TA excepted) • No reopening or challenging final decisions.

  5. Eligibility Requirements • Only one TAG at a time at a site • Listed on National Priorities List, or proposed with CERCLA action underway. • Group of individuals affected by site • Group is incorporated as nonprofit • Minimum federal grant administrative & managements met • Must include 20% cost share in project budget

  6. Ineligible Entities • No groups affiliated with national organizations • No academic institutions • No political subdivisions • No PRPs, or groups representing or receiving money from PRPs • No groups established by or sustained by any of the above

  7. “Competition” Process • Interested group submits letter of intent (LOI) to regional EPA office • EPA notifies broader community of LOI in local newspaper(s) • 30 days for coalition-building or other LOIs • 30 days to complete application • 90 days to revise/clarify application per EPA comments

  8. Criteria for Selection • Meets all minimum eligibility requirements • Ranking based on three equally-weighted criteria: • Membership is representative of broader community interests • plan to use the technical advisor • plan and ability to inform the rest of the community

  9. Funding • Initial award of up to $50,000 (by Statute) • Additional (non-competed) funding based on specific criteria: • Groups grant management track record • Site characteristics meet 3 out of 10 under 40 CFR §35.4065 • TAG funding is cost recoverable in final settlement • EPA can use site-specific accounts to fund TAGs

  10. TAGs Can Help • build trust • lend credibility to EPA information • create dialogue • foster more engaged community • community better articulate concerns/views • create better and more appropriate Agency decisions

  11. Lessons Learned (EPA) • EPA must inform community and maintain open two-way communication • Clearly communicate what is and is not on the table for discussion (manage expectations) • Communicated with community directly, not through the TA • Recognize TAG group does not speak for the whole community • Must be prepared to provide a lot of support

  12. Lessons Learned (Community) • Group must be well organized and well connected with broader community • Most success when group takes a “problem-solving” approach w/ TA • Group must be open to receiving information contrary to original views • Organization w/ identity built on mistrust and conflict → unable to meaningfully engage broader community • Federal grant requirements can be burdensome • Can be difficult to find qualified technical advisors

  13. Lessons Learned (TA) • Best if truly independent, not an advocate for a particular viewpoint • Qualities – excellent communicator and approachable • Needs to communicate what is reasonable to expect from the cleanup process and their services • Should be based within a reasonable distance from community

  14. For More Information • EPA TAG website at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/tag/index.htm

More Related