1 / 30

Database Center for North Korean Human Rights

North Korean Human Rights Violations: Key Findings and Implications. - Based primarily on NKDB’s White Paper-. Database Center for North Korean Human Rights. Main contents. Analysis of Human Rights Violations by. Year Region Location of incident Crime type Victims’ post-incident status.

lamont
Download Presentation

Database Center for North Korean Human Rights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. North Korean Human Rights Violations: • Key Findings and Implications • - Based primarily on NKDB’s White Paper- Database Center for North Korean Human Rights

  2. Main contents Analysis of Human Rights Violations by Year Region Location of incident Crime type Victims’ post-incident status

  3. 1. Year • a. Human Rights Violations Incident Year 1990s <Human rights violations by year>

  4. 1. Year • b. Violations of the Right to Life Incident Legal Execution <Violations of right to life by year> • **91.4% of legal execution is public execution

  5. 1. Year • c. Violations of the Right to Survival Incident 1990s <Violations of right to survival by year>

  6. 1. Year • c. Violations of the Right to Survival <Specific Acts of Violations of the Right to Survival> ** 77% of Death by starvation occurred in the 1990s

  7. 1. year • c. Violations of the Right to • Movement and Residence Incident 1990s <Violations of the right to movement and residence by year>

  8. 1. Year d. Violations of Personal Integrity and Liberty Incident 1990s • <Violations of the right to liberty by year>

  9. 2. region a. Human Rights Violations Incident <Human rights violationsby region>

  10. 2. region • b. Pyongyang Incident Personal Integrity and Liberty Right to Movement and Residence <Human rights violations in Pyongyang>

  11. 2. region • b. Pyongyang <Type of violations of the right to movement and residence in PY>

  12. 2. region • b. Pyongyang Incident <Type of acts against the right to movement and residence in PY by year>

  13. 2. region • b. Pyongyang Incident Illegal Arrest Illegal Detention or Imprisonment Disappearance <Type of acts against the right to liberty in Pyongyang >

  14. 2. region • c. N. Hamgyong Province Incident Right to Life Personal Integrity and Right to Liberty <Human rights violations in N. Hamgyong Province>

  15. 2. region • c. N. Hamgyong Province Incident Illegal Detention, Imprisonment Torture & Physical Violations <Type of acts of violations of the right to liberty in N. Hamgyong Province by year>

  16. 2. region • c. N. Hamgyong Province Incident SSA or Police Labor training camp Police holding camp • <The number of detention in N. Hamgyong Province by location and year>

  17. 3. Location of incidents • a. Human Rights Violations Incident Political prison camp <Human rights violations by location>

  18. 3. Location of incidents a. Political Prison Camps Incident Personal Integrity and Liberty <The number of incidents which have occurred in political prison camps>

  19. 3. Location of incidents a. Political Prison Camps ** Eye witness or second-hand reports: 95.4% Incident Illegal Detention, Imprisonment <Type of acts against personal integrity and liberty in political prison camps by year>

  20. 4. crime type • a-1. Border-Crossing Offense Incident 1990s • <The number of border-crossing offense involved in incidents by year>

  21. 4. crime type • a-2. Political Offense Incident 1990s • <The number of political offense involved in incidents by year>

  22. 4. crime type • a-3. Economic & Misdemeanor Offense Incident 1990s • <Economic crime and misdemeanor offense involved in incidents by year>

  23. 4. crime type • a-4. Guilt-by-Association System Incident • <The number of guilt-by-association system involved in incidents by year>

  24. 4. crime type • b. Victim’s Post-IncidentStatus Misdemeanor Offense • <Crime type involved in incidents in which victims were dead> • **Misdemeanor offense: traveling without permission certificate, unemployment, capitalistic attitude and etc.

  25. 4. crime type • c. Region N. Pyongan Province China N. Hamgyong Province • <Crime types listed by region>

  26. 4. crime type • c-1. Pyongyang & N. Hamgyong Province Political offense Guilt-by-association Border-crossing offense • <Types of crime type involved in violations in PY and N. Hamgyong Province>

  27. 4. Victims’ post-incident status • a. Human Rights Violation * Death of Victim Right to Life: 100.0% Right to Survival: Death of Victim 97.0% Right to Health: 88.4% * Detention Personal integrity and Right to Liberty: 70.2%

  28. 5. conclusion The severity of human rights situation In nk demands immediate & serious attention Importance of collecting information That the NK government can’t deny.

  29. http://www. nkdb.org nkdbi@hanmail.net 82-2-723-6045

  30. Thank you!

More Related