1 / 8

SNuMI: getting ready for the Director’s review

SNuMI: getting ready for the Director’s review. July 10, 2006. Final report from AAC review P5 Report to HEPAP July 6, 2006 Request from Steve Holmes for SNuMI Director’s Review CD-1 style Conceptual design report. From AAC Review in May. P5 Report to HEPAP, July 6, 2006.

lana
Download Presentation

SNuMI: getting ready for the Director’s review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SNuMI: getting ready for the Director’s review July 10, 2006 • Final report from AAC review • P5 Report to HEPAP July 6, 2006 • Request from Steve Holmes for SNuMI Director’s Review CD-1 style • Conceptual design report

  2. From AAC Review in May

  3. P5 Report to HEPAP, July 6, 2006

  4. P5 Report to HEPAP, July 6, 2006

  5. Director’s review Ed, I would like to ask you to organize a Director's Review of the SuperNuMI project. The current thinking is that given the scope of this effort (several x $10M, including a major MIRF upgrade) it will be best handled by executing as a Major Item of Equipment (MIE) Project. The scope of the review should encompass the complete set of upgrades required to move the intensity on target to 1 MW or greater. This should include both the accelerator and target station modifications required, and all project documentation required to establish a CD-1 style baseline range. In order to initiate funding in FY2009 we need to be conducting this review in the October-November timeframe. My assumption is that AD can be ready for such a review by October, so Roger or Alberto should let us know asap if this is not the case. At this time I would like to try to identify tentative dates for the review. Could you please let us know what dates are consistent with your calendar in October and November. Once we have established dates we will start assembling a committee, writing the charge, agenda, etc. Thanks, Steve

  6. CD-1 review • CD-1 review (DoE order 413.3) • Critical decision prerequisites • Conceptual Design Report • Project Data Sheet for design • Acquisition plan • Preliminary Project Execution Plan and baseline range • Verification of mission need • Preliminary Hazard Analysis Report

  7. SNuMI scenarios

  8. Super-beam upgrades to the NuMI facility – Conceptual Design Report • Executive Summary (A. Marchionni) • 1. Introduction • Present operating conditions (A. Marchionni) • Planned proton Plan upgrades (E. Prebys) • SNuMI upgrade plan (A. Marchionni) • Beam Physics issues (B. Zwaska) • 2. Elements of the Plan • WBS 1.1 Recycler upgrades (P. Derwent) • WBS 1.2 NuMI upgrades (M. Martens) • WBS 1.3 Booster upgrades (E. Prebys) • WBS 1.4 Main Injector upgrades (I. Kourbanis) • WBS 1.5 Accumulator upgrades (???) • 3. Cost and schedule (J. Sims, K. Domann) • 4. Proton projections (A. Marchionni)

More Related