1 / 25

The Priority Environmental Investment Programme for South Eastern Europe PEIP National Wokrshop

The Priority Environmental Investment Programme for South Eastern Europe PEIP National Wokrshop M unicipal I nfrastructure S upport P rogramme ( MISP ) Miodrag Gluščević , secretary at SCTM Nedeljko Ćurić , SLAP manager Belgrade, 8 th May 2008. ___ Overview___

landen
Download Presentation

The Priority Environmental Investment Programme for South Eastern Europe PEIP National Wokrshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Priority Environmental Investment Programme for South Eastern Europe PEIP National Wokrshop Municipal Infrastructure Support Programme (MISP) Miodrag Gluščević, secretary at SCTM Nedeljko Ćurić, SLAP manager Belgrade, 8th May 2008.

  2. ___ Overview___ Introduction to MISP Objectives MISP Components The Component 2 The SLAP 2.0 System The Value of MISP for Municipalities

  3. MISP Core Value for Serbian Municipalities: • “Access to Expertise for Infrastructure Project Development and Financing”

  4. Key Stakeholders of MISP: • Ministries and National Agencies • European Commission • IFIs and Banks • Municipalities and RDAs

  5. MISP Timeframe (with underlying EC Funding Programme for Infrastructure Investment) Time frame: two years starting from January 2008 From January 2008 – January 2010 (EC CARDS Programme) After January 2010 (EC IPA Programme)

  6. MISPThree Main Components Policy Dialogue and PUC Transformation Programming and Project Preparation Project Implementation

  7. (2) Programming and Project Preparation Review of policies on municipal investment planning, procurement and budgeting Prioritise and prepare suitable municipal projects for (IPA) funding (SLAP) Feasibility studies of prioritised municipal infrastructure projects and updated Design and Tender Documents.

  8. Introduction to the new SLAP 2.0 Infrastructure Projects Information System

  9. Different Signification for Different Users: • Government Ministries: System for Local Authority investment Pipeline • Municipalities: Short List of Assisted Projects • Decision Makers: Strategic List for the Approval of Projects‘ • ’SLAP’’ in Serbian language means cascade and here the symbol for a continuous stream of project toward higher maturity for investment

  10. Three Kinds of Municipal Infrastructure • Economic • Environmental • Social

  11. Economic Infrastructure offering services of general economic interest clearly lacking and crucial to economic growth • Transport • Energy • Communication • Shared Business Services (Business Estates, Incubators, etc.) • Research, Technology and Innovation • Higher Education • Tourism

  12. Environmental Infrastructure necessary for efficient environmental municipal services and to ensure long term environmental sustainability • Air quality (including District Heating) • Water supply • Wastewater • Solid waste • Noise

  13. Social Infrastructure necessary for the fair equitable redistribution of the fruits of economic success among all segments of the community especially the more vulnerable like the older, disabled, diseased or less able. • Affordable housing • Health care • Sport, culture, and heritage protection • Childcare centers • Vocational schools • Residential care facilities (elderies, disabled, etc.)

  14. SLAP 2.0 Core Values Quality: Accurate project data supplied by interested municipalities and validated by experts Flexibility:Web enabled data entry and multiple “user- adapted” reporting Transparency: Objective scoring based on published quantitative scoring protocols Value adding: for project planning, programming and decision making for financing

  15. SLAP 2.0 Key Actors Project owners: Municipal parties inputting their project data in the SLAP data base to win access to expertise and finance for implementation. SLAP manager: (SCTM) Orchestrator of the SLAP database and operator of its functions to ensure continuing high value addition to users. SLAP users: Stakeholders of municipal infrastructure projects using SLAP to advance them toward successful implementation.

  16. Project Core Dataset (1) Project Profile Basic Information Project Developer/Owner Basic Information Surrounding Socio-economic Indicators Project Development Maturity Project Framework Physical Project Components Beneficiary(ies) Projects Benefits Project Cost

  17. Project Core Dataset (2) Project Results and Activities Indicators Assumptions and Risks Institutional Framework Financial sources for investment Sustainable financial viability Environmental Safeguards Implementation Arrangement

  18. Key Functions of SLAP 2.0 Project Data Entry: Web enabled project data entry by a project owner Projects Scoring:Methodology, set of criteria, indicators and routines applied to rank projects Projects Evaluation:Methodology, set of criteria, indicators and routines applied to evaluate project pipeline(s) Projects Reports: User defined project profile report format for project validation, presentation, ranking and evaluation by various stakeholders

  19. Project Data Entry Web-enabled: Data entry through web-link out of project owner office Project Profile Version: Report representing a project development status at a given point of time Project Profile Certification:Printed project profile version signed and stamped by project owner Projects Profile Validation: Official acceptance of a certified project profile version as precondition for ranking for support by decision makers

  20. Project Reports Project Profile for Validation: Report that comprises i) standard project data form and ii) a scoring summary Project Profile for Reporting:“User defined” project reports created by the SLAP manager; (formats to include EU project fiche, logframe , project data sheets required by various funding agencies and ministries, etc.) to document and disseminate project profiles

  21. Other Reports Projects Scoring Reports: Project reports presenting the scores of different projects to decision makers and stakeholders. Project Pipeline(s) Evaluation Reports: Project pipeline evaluation report presenting the status of groups of projects from the perspective of a sectoral project pipeline.

  22. Three Levels of Project Scoring Scoring for Eligibility into Sectoral Project Pipeline Scoring for Project Preparation Support (finance for feasibility study) Scoring for Project Financing for Implementation (finance for construction)

  23. Scoring for Project Preparation Support Based on a limited scoring protocol Specific to each MISP sector Geared to: Prioritize promising projects that need support for full fledged feasibility study Stimulate the commitment of government agencies, donors, EU programme, IFIs and banks that may sponsor part of the investment process

  24. Scoring for Project Financing for Implementation Based on full scoring protocol Specific to each MISP sector Geared to mobilize government agencies, financiers, EU Programme, banks, IFIs, donors that can decide on projects to be implemented and help secure the financing gap for project investment and implementation.

  25. For more information see: www.skgo.org www.miasp.com Or call contact person: Nedeljko Ćurić, SLAP manager Tel:011 3223 446 Mob: 064 1414144 slap@skgo.org nedeljko.curic@skgo.org

More Related