1 / 4

SAC Meeting Survey - Summary

SAC Meeting Survey - Summary. Responses (61) 27 SAC members 24 Non-SAC members Why have you not attended? Too busy 41% Time/day of meetings 38% Unaware of meetings 28% Better days/times? Wednesday AM Thursday AM What kind of schedule? Set day/time each month 77%. Speaker suggestions

langer
Download Presentation

SAC Meeting Survey - Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SAC Meeting Survey - Summary • Responses (61) • 27 SAC members • 24 Non-SAC members • Why have you not attended? • Too busy 41% • Time/day of meetings 38% • Unaware of meetings 28% • Better days/times? • Wednesday AM • Thursday AM • What kind of schedule? • Set day/time each month 77% Speaker suggestions Coach Dave Clawson Dr. Anthony Atala SRI update HR/Benefits Different department updates Climate survey update Facilities Management

  2. ICC – Integration Collaboration Committee • Timeline • January 2013 Presentation to WFU/WFBMC Sr Mgmt • Spring 2013 Established joint SAC/Faculty Senate Committee • Dan Bourland Mary Cranfill • Tamara Spence Angela Culler • Michele Gillespie Bill Kane • Bruce King Jennifer Killingsworth • Duncan Hite • April-June 2013 Met with committee to draft charter, establish reporting structure, establish direction and next steps • August 2013 Presentation to WFU/WFBMC Sr Mgmt to gain approval of charter and direction

  3. ICC – Integration Collaboration Committee • From Draft Charter • Outcomes: • Prioritize at least 6-8ideas for research • Identify: • Areas & people affected by the current processes • Current initiatives on either campus related to the proposed processes • Areas responsible for the processes, who would benefit from a process change and any negative impacts or increase in workload • Global benefits/negatives for the University. • Research peer institutions for best practices • Estimate resources and time needed to implement or if further research needed • Recommend next steps • Prepare formal recommendations pertaining to collaborative process optimization to present to the Faculty Senate, SAC and senior administration

  4. ICC – Integration Collaboration Committee • Committee Identified Areas for Research • On-boarding students across campuses • Transportation (shuttle/zipcar) • Technology in general: ex. email (Google vs. Outlook), Google tools, Webex, Campus directories, Blackbaud • Pcard • Educational Software (ex. Blackboard) • Next steps?

More Related