1 / 5

MPTCP proxy for mobile networks

MPTCP proxy for mobile networks. multi-homing in 3GPP networks. Motivation Intelligent network selection for better accommodation Seamless network handover for better mobility Resource pooling across networks for better performance Roadmap

laurel
Download Presentation

MPTCP proxy for mobile networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MPTCP proxy for mobile networks

  2. multi-homing in 3GPP networks • Motivation • Intelligent network selection for better accommodation • Seamless network handover for better mobility • Resource pooling across networks for better performance • Roadmap • R6: GAN, interfaces for non-3GPP RATs through GERAN simulation. • R7: I-WLAN, interworking of PLMN with WLAN RAT. • R8: shared anchor for both I-WLAN and PS RATs, yielding seamless handover. • R8-10: EPS's mobility support for simultaneous multiple RATs through different PDN connections (MAPCON) • R10: EPS's mobility support for simultaneous multiple RATs through a single PDN connection (IFOM) • What is still missing • Pooling resources from different RATs for the use of a single IP flow.

  3. Where does MPTCP fit in? • MPTCP offers • transparent wireless resource pooling for a single "IP flow" for multi-homing UEs with least network complications • automatic selection/handover/pooling • E2E MPTCP deprives • network's control over service/RAT preference • compatibility with legacy SPs reluctant to support MPTCP • MPTCP proxy as a compromise • benefit multihoming UEs without SP's MPTCP deployment • maintain operator's policy enforcement point

  4. Usecases • Enhanced experience • in addition to static policies • flexible traffic loading base on network status • resource pooling for enhanced QoE/mobility • Reduced expenses • aided by subscription/charging information • guide the consumption of compound bandwidth package in a more economic way • resource pooling for reduced expense for user/operator

  5. Requirements for MPTCP proxy • Protocol transition • Detection of UE's MPTCP capability • Negotiation with MPTCP UE on behalf of non-MPTCP SP • Transcoding between TCP and MPTCP connections • Traffic mediation • Anchoring of subflow traffic • sitting directly on the shared path of or • have explicit anchoring over MPTCP subflows • Mediation of subflow traffic • policy driven mediation • management driven mediation

More Related