1 / 12

DAC Assessment Team Meeting September 11, 2013

DAC Assessment Team Meeting September 11, 2013. Agenda. Introductions (Another) Overview of Assessment Process 2011-2013 Assessment Cycle – Complete 2012-2014 Assessment Cycle – Pilot 2013-2015 Assessment Cycle – Getting Started Q&A/Open Discussion. I. Introductions.

lavender
Download Presentation

DAC Assessment Team Meeting September 11, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DAC Assessment Team MeetingSeptember 11, 2013

  2. Agenda • Introductions • (Another) Overview of Assessment Process • 2011-2013 Assessment Cycle – Complete • 2012-2014 Assessment Cycle – Pilot • 2013-2015 Assessment Cycle – Getting Started • Q&A/Open Discussion

  3. I. Introductions

  4. II. The Assessment Process • Assess Nine (9) Learning Outcomes Over Four Years • Three Overlapping Two-Year Assessment Cycles • Cycle #1 (2011-2013), Cycle #2 (2012-2014), Cycle #3 (2013-2015) • Three Learning Outcomes Assessed per Cycle • Assess Select Courses from Area of Core Linked w/ Learning Outcome • Overview of Two-Year Assessment Cycle • Year #1: Design & Pilot • Year #2: Refine & Implement • Where are We Now (September 2013)? • Cycle #1, Completed! • Cycle #2, Year #2 • Cycle #3, Year #1

  5. Two-Year Assessment Cycle

  6. Please Remember 1) This is Program-Level Assessment • This exercise is about measuring student learning across the General Education curriculum. • This exercise is NOT about evaluating specific courses/course sections. • This exercise is NOT about the performance of individual faculty. 2) Assessment Does NOT Have to be Disruptive • Build on what you are already doing  consider the value of EMBEDDED INSTRUMENTS • Simplify your life  consider the value of RUBRICS

  7. III. 2011-2013 Assessment Cycle • POLS 1101 Experience & Outcomes • Learning Outcome: US Perspectives • Instrument: Non-embedded post-test (MC+Essay) • Rubric: Yes, Analytic • Participation: Universal, 29 sections (c. 1800 students) • Moving Forward: Revise, rescale…but to continue • ENGL 1102 Experience & Outcomes • Learning Outcomes: Reading Comprehension & Written Communication • Instrument: Embedded writing assignment • Rubric: Yes, Holistic • Participation: Universal, 112 sections (c. 2400 students) • Moving Forward: Revise, rescale…but to continue

  8. IV. 2012-2014 Assessment Cycle • Social Science • Ryan (HIST) • Global Perspectives • Margaret (DANC) • Edward (MUSI) • Kris (ART) • Critical Thinking • Jan (COM) • Noah (FL) • Tom (PHIL)

  9. V. 2013-2015 Assessment Cycle • Lay Groundwork with Colleagues • I’m happy to talk to anyone at any time • Map Learning Outcome on to Course(s) • Are there things you’re already doing that could be used to assess learning outcome? • KEY: Experience should be common to all students • Consider the Value of Rubrics • Simplifies data creation and collection • May be particularly useful for “Natural Science” learning outcome • KEY: Criteria should map on to learning outcome

  10. VI. Q&A/Open Discussion

More Related