180 likes | 273 Views
Using Mixed Methods to Investigate Condition Management Programmes. Carly Reagon Department of Occupational Therapy. Introduction. Research investigating the effectiveness of Condition Management Programmes Mixed methods - why choose this methodology? - what are the challenges?
E N D
Using Mixed Methods to Investigate Condition Management Programmes Carly Reagon Department of Occupational Therapy
Introduction • Research investigating the effectiveness of Condition Management Programmes • Mixed methods - why choose this methodology? - what are the challenges? • My journey as a researcher
What are Condition Management Programmes? • Since 1979, number of incapacity benefit (IB) claimants have trebled to 2.7 million or 7% of UK population • Research suggests most IB claimants want to work • Research also suggests that work is good for you! • As part of the Pathways To Work scheme, Condition Management Programmes (CMPs) aim to help people overcome barriers to work • Launched in 2003, national roll out from 2006
Barriers to work for IB claimants Condition management Group and 1:1 sessions - anxiety management - work-related skills - pain management etc. Biopsychosocial approach CBT MDT • Health condition • Side effects of medication • Age • Lack of skill/qualifications • Lack of confidence • Disempowerment
Aims of the research To explore the effectiveness of 3 NHS-led CMPs in Wales in terms of: • Enabling individuals to manage their health condition(s) better • Moving individuals closer to work, education or training
Methodology Case study Collation of outcome measures for CMP participants across 12 months (SF36v2, GSES, HADS) (N=247) Qualitative interviews with CMP participants, managers, and practitioners (N=27)
A mixed methods approach • An evolving methodology • Combining quantitative and qualitative research methods within a single study • ? A third research paradigm (Johnson and Onwuegbuzie 2004)
Why choose mixed methods? • The complexity of healthcare research • Answering research questions effectively • Gaining new insight • Appeals to a wider audience?
Aims of the research Effectiveness in terms of: • Enabling individuals to manage their health condition(s) better • Moving individuals closer to work, education or training Quantitative data: before and after outcome measure scores of physical health, mental health, and self efficacy Qualitative data: perceived behavioural change, motivations, challenges, approaches, professional relationships
The start of the journey Scared researcher Curious qualitative researcher Happy qualitative researcher
Challenges of using mixed methods • When and how to mix: During data collection? Data analysis? Interpretation? “Concurrent triangulation strategy” (Creswell 2009) • Learning new skills • Combining results e.g. discrepancies • Triangulation
How to mix successfully! • Preparation • Organisation • Focus • The right software • Learning from others • Pluck!
Some preliminary results 1. Outcome data show significant increase in mental health scores, but only slight increase (and in some cases, decrease) in physical health scores - Qualitative data emphasise management NOT treatment - Participants gave examples of worsening physical health but increased ability to cope
Some preliminary results 2. Significant positive increase in mental health scores, but still below average for general population - Qualitative data question work as an outcome - Rather CMP is first step on the ladder
Some preliminary results 3. Qualitative data very positive about CMPs - Participants want to ‘give something back’ - Outcome data provide cases where health has become worse
Still a long way to go Enthused researcher Scared researcher Curious qualitative researcher Happy qualitative researcher