90 likes | 106 Views
University of Arkansas – Fort Smith College of Education. Laura Witherington, Director Western Education Renewal Zone. Who We Are. Formerly West-Ark Community College Became a 4-year university 2002 Regional undergraduate university, soon to add graduate programs
E N D
University of Arkansas – Fort SmithCollege of Education Laura Witherington, Director Western Education Renewal Zone
Who We Are • Formerly West-Ark Community College • Became a 4-year university 2002 • Regional undergraduate university, soon to add graduate programs • 41 Bachelor’s degrees; 23 Associate’s degress • Almost 8,000 students • Mostly commuter • Many non-traditional • Mission: UA Fort Smith prepares students to succeed in an ever-changing global world while advancing economic development and quality of place.
College of Education • 1100 majors • 120 graduates each year • 35 school partners • 16 full-time faculty • Mission: Professionals United to Ensure Continuous Learning and Success
Why We Stand Out Criterion 1: Articulation and Evidence of Outcomes • COE established SLOs based on research-based best practice. • The SLOs are published multiple ways. • Assignments and assessments were developed based on the SLOs and in collaboration with school partners. • COE developed rubrics for consistent implementation of assessments. • COE uses a complex electronic data collection system through LiveText to collect data at all levels.
Why We Stand Out Criterion 2: Success with Regard to Outcomes • DAREs: Data Analysis Review Events • Each semester • All stake-holders in the process • Additional sources of analyzed data • Curricular Advisory Committee • Institutional SLO reports • Graduate and employer surveys • Praxis III • ADE reports on student achievement
Why We Stand Out Criterion 3: Information to the Public about Outcomes • AASCU McAuliffe Finalist (2010) • AR Mentor of the Year Awards (2009, 2010) • Practicum • Websites • Facebook • Monthly TEC meetings • Scholarly presentations
Why We Stand Out Criterion 4: Using Outcomes for Improvement • Changes to assignments • Change in service requirements • Disposition clarity • Coursework (program of study) changes based on Praxis II score disaggregation • Clarity of Conceptual Framework
What Now? • We are changing it all. • More technology. • Deeper analysis. • Expectation for continued growth and changes.